InterNACHI


Go Back   InterNACHI Inspection Forum > General Inspection Topics > General Inspection Discussion

Notices

General Inspection Discussion This is a place for general discussion about the home inspection industry. Try to keep the posts topical, but they need not be as specific as the other areas of this board.

 
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
  #1  
Old 12/10/09, 6:41 PM
Ben J. Gromicko's Avatar
Ben J. Gromicko Ben J. Gromicko is offline
InterNACHI Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Boulder, CO
Posts: 2,224
Default REPAIR vs. REPLACE

An inspector in the state of OK inspected a house recently. The water heater tank was identified as an 8 year old Bradford White nat. gas heater.

And the report included this language, "There is a water leak and heavy rust or corrosion on the water connector and fittings of the water heater that will need further evaluation and service by an appropriately qualified specialist."

But the hand-written summary stated, "Corrosion and leak at top of hot water tank (Repair)."

When I evaluate home inspection reports and claims, I notice things like this. The report is written very well by the inspector - using a computer software program. The report identifies a problem (or condition) and makes a recommendation for a professional to further evaluate. Great.

BUT the hand-written summary has "(Repair)" written. And this is the problem.

Long story short - two plumbers further evaluated the tank, the home warranty company denied the claim, and both plumbers recommended a COMPLETE REPLACEMENT of the water heater tank - NOT a REPAIR - as recommended by the inspector in the hand-written summary.

LESSONS LEARNED:
  1. Do not hand-write your reports or summaries. It makes you write some short, quickly worded language such as "(Repair)." Type your report. Better yet use a computer-generated program. Computer-generated reports/documents are superior to hand-written ones.
  2. Be careful when using the terms REPAIR or REPLACEMENT. They mean very different things, and your client will assume that if you say REPAIR, but REPLACEMENT is actually needed - you're going to pay for the difference.



BEN GROMICKO
InterNACHI Director of Education
"
Now That You've Had a Home Inspection" Book
Reply With Quote
Find an InterNACHI certified Wisconsin Home Inspector (and anywhere else in North America)
  #2  
Old 12/10/09, 6:53 PM
Bob Elliott's Avatar
Bob Elliott Bob Elliott is online now
InterNACHI Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Chicago
Posts: 21,906
Default Re: REPAIR vs. REPLACE

I am not a fan of handwritten checklist style reports but I honestly think the mistake could occur more easily with a computer canned report.

We are all skilled enough to know it needs replacement so you might click the wrong comment by accident, while hand written you must make a mental decision as you write.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 12/10/09, 7:23 PM
Kevin A. Richardson Kevin A. Richardson is offline
InterNACHI Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,334
Default Re: REPAIR vs. REPLACE

I never say repair or replace. I use the term "Corrective Action."

"Adverse Condition: The water heater in the utility room is leaking at the supply shut-off valve. The leak is causing rust damage and corrosion to the top of the tank. Recommend Corrective Action by a Qualified Plumber."

I include the definition of the term in my inspection glossary:

Corrective Action: This designates Adverse Conditions for which evaluation by a qualified individual is recommended as soon as possible for any necessary modifications or corrective measures. If, in the process of evaluating and addressing such conditions, it is determined that there are other Adverse Conditions present for which modifications or corrective measures are also deemed necessary, it is recommended that they be addressed at that time. It is further recommended that a copy of the appropriate portion or portions of the inspection report be provided to all qualified individuals retained to evaluate and/or perform modifications or corrective measures to address Adverse Conditions documented in the Inspection Report.

Adverse Condition: A condition determined in accordance with the contractual scope of inspection, which is producing a detrimental effect on systems or components and/or impairing the normally intended function or operation of systems or components.

Kevin



Kevin A. Richardson
Level III Infraspection Institute Certified Infrared Thermographer®, #7493
Infraspection Institute Thermography Instructor
BPI Certified Building Performance Analyst
RESNET Level II Home Energy Survey Professional
Maryland Licensed Home Inspector, #29727
InterNACHI Certified Professional Inspector, #04091175


301-942-4610
www.richnspect.com
www.infrared-diagnostics.com
www.thehomegreenteam.com
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 12/10/09, 8:17 PM
Marcel Gratton's Avatar
Marcel Gratton Marcel Gratton is offline
InterNACHI Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Gatineau, QC
Posts: 1,776
Default Re: REPAIR vs. REPLACE

Quote:
Originally Posted by krichardson View Post
I never say repair or replace. I use the term "Corrective Action."

"Adverse Condition: The water heater in the utility room is leaking at the supply shut-off valve. The leak is causing rust damage and corrosion to the top of the tank. Recommend Corrective Action by a Qualified Plumber."

I include the definition of the term in my inspection glossary:

Corrective Action: This designates Adverse Conditions for which evaluation by a qualified individual is recommended as soon as possible for any necessary modifications or corrective measures. If, in the process of evaluating and addressing such conditions, it is determined that there are other Adverse Conditions present for which modifications or corrective measures are also deemed necessary, it is recommended that they be addressed at that time. It is further recommended that a copy of the appropriate portion or portions of the inspection report be provided to all qualified individuals retained to evaluate and/or perform modifications or corrective measures to address Adverse Conditions documented in the Inspection Report.

Adverse Condition: A condition determined in accordance with the contractual scope of inspection, which is producing a detrimental effect on systems or components and/or impairing the normally intended function or operation of systems or components.

Kevin
Kevin,

But does the WH needs to be replaced asked the client???

Cheers,



Marcel Gratton, NACHI04011210, CMI
On The Level Inspection
Gatineau, Québec
http://www.onthelevelinspection.com/
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 12/10/09, 8:20 PM
Terry Clayton Terry Clayton is offline
InterNACHI Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Arnold, MO
Posts: 246
Default Re: REPAIR vs. REPLACE

Very nicely written Kevin, Happy holidays
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 12/10/09, 9:16 PM
Jeffrey R. Pope's Avatar
Jeffrey R. Pope Jeffrey R. Pope is offline
InterNACHI Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Santa Clarita, CA
Posts: 8,047
Default Re: REPAIR vs. REPLACE

I have no problem recommending one of the following;

(1) Repair
(2) Replace
(3) Repair or Replace.

and I know how to type it



IF YOUR INSPECTOR IS NOT USING THERMAL IMAGING, YOU'RE NOT GETTING THE WHOLE PICTURE ®
Jeff Pope
JPI Home Inspection Service
Santa Clarita CA
(661) 212-0738
Santa Clarita Home Inspection
http://www.MyInspector.net


Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 12/10/09, 10:12 PM
Stephen W. Stanczyk's Avatar
Stephen W. Stanczyk Stephen W. Stanczyk is offline
InterNACHI Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Kapowsin, WA
Posts: 4,965
Send a message via AIM to sstanczyk
Default Re: REPAIR vs. REPLACE

Hmm. Two plumbers chose to recommend complete replacement. That would be $1400 vs. maybe $50 to replace a nipple and flexible supply line. Imagine that. Repair or replace as needed. Budget accordingly.




Stephen Stanczyk
Washington State Licensed Home Inspector # 221
President, Washington Association of Property Inspectors (WAPI)
(253) 241-0602 calls answered until 10pm


Pierce County -Thurston County - King County - Snohomish County
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 12/10/09, 10:18 PM
Brian E. Kelly's Avatar
Brian E. Kelly Brian E. Kelly is offline
InterNACHI Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 15,973
Default Re: REPAIR vs. REPLACE

Repair or replace fine.

What a shock a "Warranty" Company denied the claim?????

Writing a report and saying "heavy rust" is not clever. Exactly how "heavy" is the rust???
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 12/10/09, 10:37 PM
Dan Bowers, CMI Dan Bowers, CMI is offline
InterNACHI Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Shawnee Mission, KS
Posts: 3,892
Default Re: REPAIR vs. REPLACE

I don't have a problem with either verbiage:

"There is a water leak and heavy rust or corrosion on the water connector and fittings of the water heater. Service and correction by a competent and licensed plumbing contractor is recommended."

OR

"There is a water leak and heavy rust or corrosion on the water connector and fittings of the water heater. Have a competent and licensed plumbing contractor service the unit and then repair or replace as needed".

OR

"There is a water leak and heavy rust or corrosion on the water connector and fittings of the water heater that needs service and repair of some type by a competent and licensed plumbing contractor".

OR

The water heater is heavily rusted and fittings are leaking. Have a competent contractor service and repair the unit AS NEEDED".


Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 12/11/09, 12:59 AM
Brian E. Kelly's Avatar
Brian E. Kelly Brian E. Kelly is offline
InterNACHI Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 15,973
Default Re: REPAIR vs. REPLACE

If it is corroded and leaking, does it matter if it is "Heavy"?? Is your "Heavy" the same as someones "Heavy" in another State?

Too subjective for me, best to leave bs adjectives out, IMO.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 12/11/09, 1:03 AM
Frank Magdefrau's Avatar
Frank Magdefrau Frank Magdefrau is offline
InterNACHI Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Hernando, MS
Posts: 3,396
Default Re: REPAIR vs. REPLACE

Quote:
Originally Posted by krichardson View Post
I never say repair or replace. I use the term "Corrective Action."

"Adverse Condition: The water heater in the utility room is leaking at the supply shut-off valve. The leak is causing rust damage and corrosion to the top of the tank. Recommend Corrective Action by a Qualified Plumber."

I include the definition of the term in my inspection glossary:

Corrective Action: This designates Adverse Conditions for which evaluation by a qualified individual is recommended as soon as possible for any necessary modifications or corrective measures. If, in the process of evaluating and addressing such conditions, it is determined that there are other Adverse Conditions present for which modifications or corrective measures are also deemed necessary, it is recommended that they be addressed at that time. It is further recommended that a copy of the appropriate portion or portions of the inspection report be provided to all qualified individuals retained to evaluate and/or perform modifications or corrective measures to address Adverse Conditions documented in the Inspection Report.

Adverse Condition: A condition determined in accordance with the contractual scope of inspection, which is producing a detrimental effect on systems or components and/or impairing the normally intended function or operation of systems or components.

Kevin
FYI- When writting (reports) you should always speak in "past tense"

The water heater was leaking...

You only use- The water heater is leaking... when you are on-site telling who ever is there you need to inform in person.



Frank Magdefrau
Certified Master Inspector
DeSoto Home Inspection Services, LLC
3152 Big Ben S
Hernando, MS 38632
(901) 486-0421

InterNACHI Member since 2002
InterNACHI message board member since 2003
InterNACHI ESOP member from 2004 to 2010

Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 12/11/09, 1:14 AM
Russel Ray's Avatar
Russel Ray Russel Ray is offline
InterNACHI Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: La Mesa, CA
Posts: 16,629
Default Re: REPAIR vs. REPLACE

Quote:
Originally Posted by bgromicko View Post
An inspector in the state of OK inspected a house recently. The water heater tank was identified as an 8 year old Bradford White nat. gas heater.

And the report included this language, "There is a water leak and heavy rust or corrosion on the water connector and fittings of the water heater that will need further evaluation and service by an appropriately qualified specialist."

But the hand-written summary stated, "Corrosion and leak at top of hot water tank (Repair)."

When I evaluate home inspection reports and claims, I notice things like this. The report is written very well by the inspector - using a computer software program. The report identifies a problem (or condition) and makes a recommendation for a professional to further evaluate. Great.

BUT the hand-written summary has "(Repair)" written. And this is the problem.

Long story short - two plumbers further evaluated the tank, the home warranty company denied the claim, and both plumbers recommended a COMPLETE REPLACEMENT of the water heater tank - NOT a REPAIR - as recommended by the inspector in the hand-written summary.

LESSONS LEARNED:
  1. Do not hand-write your reports or summaries. It makes you write some short, quickly worded language such as "(Repair)." Type your report. Better yet use a computer-generated program. Computer-generated reports/documents are superior to hand-written ones.
  2. Be careful when using the terms REPAIR or REPLACEMENT. They mean very different things, and your client will assume that if you say REPAIR, but REPLACEMENT is actually needed - you're going to pay for the difference.
I always "recommend repair or replacement." That way I'm covered regardless of what the other professional recommends.



NACHI 2005 U.S. Member of the Year
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 12/11/09, 2:21 AM
Russell Spriggs's Avatar
Russell Spriggs Russell Spriggs is offline
InterNACHI Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Coeur d'Alene, ID area
Posts: 3,993
Default Re: REPAIR vs. REPLACE

A hand-written summary?
Sounds like a suicide pill!

Verbal summary on site, pending written report, which supercedes all else.

Recommend further evaluation for repair or replacement by licensed contractor.
Reply With Quote
Find an InterNACHI certified Wisconsin Home Inspector (and anywhere else in North America)
  #14  
Old 12/11/09, 11:47 AM
Jeffrey R. Pope's Avatar
Jeffrey R. Pope Jeffrey R. Pope is offline
InterNACHI Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Santa Clarita, CA
Posts: 8,047
Default Re: REPAIR vs. REPLACE

Quote:
Originally Posted by fmagdefrau View Post
FYI- When writting (reports) you should always speak in "past tense"

The water heater was leaking...

You only use- The water heater is leaking... when you are on-site telling who ever is there you need to inform in person.
When did it stop leaking?

My reports are written in the "present tense."

The water heater is leaking - and as far as I am concerned, until such time that it is corrected, it is still leaking.



IF YOUR INSPECTOR IS NOT USING THERMAL IMAGING, YOU'RE NOT GETTING THE WHOLE PICTURE ®
Jeff Pope
JPI Home Inspection Service
Santa Clarita CA
(661) 212-0738
Santa Clarita Home Inspection
http://www.MyInspector.net


Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 12/11/09, 11:49 AM
gbeaumont's Avatar
gbeaumont gbeaumont is offline
InterNACHI Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Clearwater, FL
Posts: 6,261
Send a message via AIM to gbeaumont Send a message via MSN to gbeaumont Send a message via Yahoo to gbeaumont
Default Re: REPAIR vs. REPLACE

Quote:
Originally Posted by rray View Post
I always "recommend repair or replacement." That way I'm covered regardless of what the other professional recommends.
Ditto

Regards

Gerry



"To realize our true destiny, we must be guided not by a myth from our past, but by a vision of our future."
(Mark B Adams)

Commercial property Inspection Tampa, Orlando, Sarasota, Jacksonville, Ft Launderdale, Miami, Florida.
NACHI cell 484-429-5466
NACHI02121106

Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Make $50.00 More Profit per Inspection with Septic Tanks ebeahm1 Ancillary Inspection Services & Additional Topics 6 8/20/09 1:38 PM
Septic System Care mlarson Ancillary Inspection Services & Additional Topics 52 8/31/07 10:26 PM
Oil Tank Leaking jhagarty Inspecting HVAC Systems 0 6/27/07 4:15 PM
Oil Tank in Basement Bedroom! csteele Inspecting HVAC Systems 18 10/23/06 8:25 AM
Proper Complaint Procedures rcooke Canadian Inspectors 0 8/15/06 10:35 AM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:02 AM.


Popular Sections

:

All Sections

Inspection News

InterNACHI Membership

Inspection Standards

Inspection Education

InterNACHI Inspectors

Inspection Links

 

 

 

NACHI.ORG Statistics

 

 

no new posts