sosborne1
(Steve Osborne, 70001310)
March 12, 2015, 1:49am
1
How does everyone interpret this excerpt from the Nachi Standards of Practice?
First it says we need to describe the type of insulation, then it says we are not required to identify the composition. I’m confused. Isn’t type and composition the same thing?
Thanks in advance.
3.9. Attic, Insulation & Ventilation
II. The inspector shall describe:
A . the type of insulation observed;
IV. The inspector is NOT required to:
E. identify the composition
kramm
(Kenneth A. Ramm)
March 12, 2015, 2:28am
2
Type: Is a particular kind.
Composition: Is somethings ingredient.
Hope this helps.
sosborne1
(Steve Osborne, 70001310)
March 12, 2015, 1:57pm
3
OK yes that helps thanks.
jjonas
(Jeffrey Jonas)
March 12, 2015, 2:16pm
4
Such as:
Type: Vermiculite
Composition: Possible ACM (Asbestos Containing Material), Vermiculite is a hydrous phyllosilicate mineral . It undergoes significant expansion when heated. Exfoliation occurs when the mineral is heated sufficiently, and the effect is routinely produced in commercial furnaces. Vermiculite is formed by weathering or hydrothermal alteration of biotite or phlogopite .[2]](Vermiculite - Wikipedia )
kramm
(Kenneth A. Ramm)
March 12, 2015, 2:51pm
5
How does everyone interpret this excerpt from the Nachi Standards of Practice?
First it says we need to describe the type of insulation, then it says we are not required to identify the composition. I’m confused. Isn’t type and composition the same thing?
Thanks in advance.
3.9. Attic, Insulation & Ventilation
II. The inspector shall describe:
A . the type of insulation observed;
IV. The inspector is NOT required to:
E. identify the composition
From SOP Requires insulation ID?? - InterNACHI Inspection Forum http://www.nachi.org/forum/f11/standard-practice-requires-insulation-id-99362/#post1307733#ixzz3UBPfbrKu
That would be correct. :mrgreen:
jjonas
(Jeffrey Jonas)
March 12, 2015, 3:13pm
6
Duh! Of course it is. Why else would I post it? :blank:
frotte
(Frank Rotte)
March 12, 2015, 3:52pm
7
Type would be batt, loose fill,etc. IMHO
sosborne1
(Steve Osborne, 70001310)
March 12, 2015, 6:24pm
8
Frank, so do you only identity loose fill or batt, or do you try to identify fiberglass, rockwool,vermiculite etc?
frotte
(Frank Rotte)
March 12, 2015, 6:55pm
9
sosborne1:
Frank, so do you only identity loose fill or batt, or do you try to identify fiberglass, rockwool,vermiculite etc?
I’m saying that the definition of “type” is loose fill, batt, spray foam, etc.
ccurrins
(Christopher Currins, CMI)
March 12, 2015, 7:14pm
10
I agree.
Describing it would identify it as fiberglass, cellulose, vermiculite, etc.
http://www.lowes.com/images/LCI/Planning/BuyingGuides/insulation-chart.jpg
sosborne1
(Steve Osborne, 70001310)
March 12, 2015, 7:27pm
11
Great! I get it now thanks so much. Thank you for the chart Christopher that really helps also. I’m going to print it and keep it as a reference.
frotte
(Frank Rotte)
March 12, 2015, 7:41pm
12
Not all batts are fiberglass as the chart seems to infer. Cotton batts for one.
ccurrins
(Christopher Currins, CMI)
March 12, 2015, 7:43pm
13
I only posted the chart to show what “type” meant in this situation.
frotte
(Frank Rotte)
March 12, 2015, 7:45pm
14
Yes, understood. Nice chart.
kramm
(Kenneth A. Ramm)
March 12, 2015, 10:55pm
15
sosborne1:
Frank, so do you only identity loose fill or batt, or do you try to identify fiberglass, rockwool,vermiculite etc?
I only identify batt, blown in, or lack there of as I see some with nothing. The exception is vermiculite, I do say something like what Jeff posted.