InterNACHI


Go Back   InterNACHI Inspection Forum > General Inspection Topics > General Inspection Discussion

Notices

General Inspection Discussion This is a place for general discussion about the home inspection industry. Try to keep the posts topical, but they need not be as specific as the other areas of this board.

 
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
  #46  
Old 6/30/09, 10:25 AM
mnahrgang's Avatar
mnahrgang mnahrgang is offline
InterNACHI Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Springfield, OH
Posts: 5,799
Default Re: Standards question

Quote:
Originally Posted by gromicko View Post
Could a foundation crack be a major defect yet not affect habitability of the home?
No, not in my opinion. Obviously there are different levels of concern with a crack. But once it reached "major" then it would affect the habitability...

A simple crack is just a crack and is not a Major Concern. One that shows signs of settling would be a major concern, because that would affect the habitability of the home... especially if the wall collapsed.



Mark Nahrgang
www.DaytonSpringfieldHomeInspector.com
www.HeyMark.info

Home Inspections for Springfield, Dayton, and surrounding OH areas.
Reply With Quote
Find an InterNACHI certified Oregon Home Inspector (and anywhere else in North America)
  #47  
Old 6/30/09, 11:29 AM
Nick Gromicko's Avatar
Nick Gromicko Nick Gromicko is online now
InterNACHI Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Valley Forge, PA
Posts: 30,607
Default Re: Standards question

Can you think of a defect that would affect the home's value but not its habitability?



Nick Gromicko, Certified Master Inspector

Find a Home Inspector
"Just as iron sharpens iron, one man sharpens another." Proverbs 27:17
Reply With Quote
  #48  
Old 6/30/09, 11:42 AM
mnahrgang's Avatar
mnahrgang mnahrgang is offline
InterNACHI Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Springfield, OH
Posts: 5,799
Default Re: Standards question

Yep... Broken window seals. Very expensive to repair or replace, but don't affect the habitability at all. Primarily a cosmetic issue.



Mark Nahrgang
www.DaytonSpringfieldHomeInspector.com
www.HeyMark.info

Home Inspections for Springfield, Dayton, and surrounding OH areas.
Reply With Quote
  #49  
Old 6/30/09, 11:48 AM
rmaday's Avatar
rmaday rmaday is offline
Active Poster
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Itasca, IL
Posts: 5,197
Please Note: rmaday is a non-member guest and is in no way affiliated with InterNACHI or its members.
Default Re: Standards question

Quote:
Originally Posted by gromicko View Post
Can you think of a defect that would affect the home's value but not its habitability?
Bad AC compressor
Reply With Quote
  #50  
Old 6/30/09, 11:49 AM
rmaday's Avatar
rmaday rmaday is offline
Active Poster
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Itasca, IL
Posts: 5,197
Please Note: rmaday is a non-member guest and is in no way affiliated with InterNACHI or its members.
Default Re: Standards question

Quote:
Originally Posted by mnahrgang View Post
Yep... Broken window seals. Very expensive to repair or replace, but don't affect the habitability at all. Primarily a cosmetic issue.
Doesn't that also affect the energy efficiency?
Reply With Quote
  #51  
Old 6/30/09, 12:23 PM
mnahrgang's Avatar
mnahrgang mnahrgang is offline
InterNACHI Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Springfield, OH
Posts: 5,799
Default Re: Standards question

Quote:
Originally Posted by rmaday View Post
Doesn't that also affect the energy efficiency?
Yea... but not that much and it still doesn't affect habitability.



Mark Nahrgang
www.DaytonSpringfieldHomeInspector.com
www.HeyMark.info

Home Inspections for Springfield, Dayton, and surrounding OH areas.
Reply With Quote
  #52  
Old 6/30/09, 12:39 PM
Nick Gromicko's Avatar
Nick Gromicko Nick Gromicko is online now
InterNACHI Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Valley Forge, PA
Posts: 30,607
Default Re: Standards question

I like "material" best, as the legal definition of it is much more narrow.

InterNACHI's SOP's definition of "material" is even more narrow:

Quote:
1.2. A Material Defect is a condition of a residential real property, or any portion of it, that would have a significant, adverse impact on the value of the real property, or that involves an unreasonable risk to people on the property. The fact that a structural element, system or subsystem is near, at or beyond the end of the normal useful life of such a structural element, system or subsystem is not by itself a material defect.
And then InterNACHI's agreeement (between inspector and client) even further limits the inspector's duty by requiring the inspector to only report those defects that he/she deemed material:

Quote:
1. INSPECTOR agrees to perform a visual inspection of the home/building and to provide CLIENT with a written inspection report identifying the defects that INSPECTOR both observed and deemed material.
Nothing can stop the super-human strength of InterNACHI's SOP/Agreement combo.



Nick Gromicko, Certified Master Inspector

Find a Home Inspector
"Just as iron sharpens iron, one man sharpens another." Proverbs 27:17
Reply With Quote
  #53  
Old 6/30/09, 12:43 PM
Blaine Wiley Blaine Wiley is offline
InterNACHI Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Rotonda West, FL
Posts: 3,186
Send a message via MSN to bwiley
Default Re: Standards question

Quote:
Originally Posted by gromicko View Post
Nothing can stop the super-human strength of InterNACHI's SOP/Agreement combo.
You stated in an earlier post that the combo has never been beaten in court. I suppose the logical question to that is, when has it been tested in court, and in what states?



Don't interfere with anything in the Constitution. That must be maintained, for it is the only safeguard of our liberties.
Abraham Lincoln



www.qualityhomeinspectionsfl.com
Reply With Quote
  #54  
Old 6/30/09, 1:02 PM
Nick Gromicko's Avatar
Nick Gromicko Nick Gromicko is online now
InterNACHI Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Valley Forge, PA
Posts: 30,607
Default Re: Standards question

Some member gets sued (and usually settles) about every 3-4 weeks at InterNACHI. One of the reasons the plaintiff settles is this combo (described above). Oddly, most claims involve items pointed out by the inspector or items not required to be inspected.

Anyway, not only has the combo never lost in any court in N. America, but there has never been any attorney ever that has felt they could legally "top" that language. We've had hundreds (that I know of, maybe more) of attorneys who have looked at, and contacted us about our agreement in drafting one for their client. Of course they all add their favorite disclosures, disclaimers, and fluff... but they always leave the paragraphs I referenced above. Our attorneys even have strategies lined up to help them win.

Every now and then we get cousin Marvin who has a law license and decides to write a "custom" agreement from scratch (thus discarding the thousands of legal man hours we've already put into ours). I attend every legal session regarding all InterNACHI's documents and have my head around them, so if you post one of those custom agreements here... I'll be happy to point out to you and your attorney what is wrong with it, and explain why it is wrong.



Nick Gromicko, Certified Master Inspector

Find a Home Inspector
"Just as iron sharpens iron, one man sharpens another." Proverbs 27:17

Last edited by gromicko; 6/30/09 at 1:08 PM..
Reply With Quote
  #55  
Old 6/30/09, 2:25 PM
Joe Farsetta's Avatar
Joe Farsetta Joe Farsetta is offline
ESOP Committee Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Pearl River, NY
Posts: 4,115
Default Re: Standards question

Mark,

Quote:
No, not in my opinion. Obviously there are different levels of concern with a crack. But once it reached "major" then it would affect the habitability...
How can you possibly make this statement with any degree of credibility? Please define a major crack. Would a 1/2" wide vertical crack carry the same structural significance as a 1/2" step crack, or a 1/2" horizontal crack? What about an 1/8" creck with lateral displacement, as opposed to a 1/2" crack with no displacement? How about a 1/8" crack with water pouring through it, versus a 1/2" crack with no water? Which cracks affect, or potentially affect, a home's habitability? For that matter, what legally allows you to discern a minor from a major crack? Are you a PE?

You say that window seals do not affect a dwelling's habitability. How about a thermal leak bad enough to have caused the window frame to swell, and rendering it too difficult for an elderly person to open, AND this window is the sole egress window in the room. Has this affected habitibility? Yes it has...
Reply With Quote
  #56  
Old 6/30/09, 8:14 PM
mnahrgang's Avatar
mnahrgang mnahrgang is offline
InterNACHI Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Springfield, OH
Posts: 5,799
Default Re: Standards question

Quote:
Originally Posted by jfarsetta View Post
Mark,



How can you possibly make this statement with any degree of credibility? Experience. Please define a major crack. One that indicates a structural concern over normal minor concrete shrinkage cracking. Would a 1/2" wide vertical crack carry the same structural significance as a 1/2" step crack, or a 1/2" horizontal crack? What about an 1/8" creck with lateral displacement, as opposed to a 1/2" crack with no displacement? How about a 1/8" crack with water pouring through it, versus a 1/2" crack with no water? Which cracks affect, or potentially affect, a home's habitability? Every example you sited would be major. You overlooked the obvious for minor. For that matter, what legally allows you to discern a minor from a major crack? Are you a PE? Irrelevant questions.On the same note, what legally allows us to determine value of a concern. Are we appraisers?

You say that window seals do not affect a dwelling's habitability. How about a thermal leak bad enough to have caused the window frame to swell, and rendering it too difficult for an elderly person to open, AND this window is the sole egress window in the room. Has this affected habitibility? Yes it has... No it hasn't. If the window won't open, and tis is the sole egress that is a different concern other than a simple ugly broken seal. Two different scenarios.
Is that clear enough and simple enough for you?



Mark Nahrgang
www.DaytonSpringfieldHomeInspector.com
www.HeyMark.info

Home Inspections for Springfield, Dayton, and surrounding OH areas.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
National Occupational Standards wblakey Canadian Inspectors 40 5/18/08 12:16 PM
New Standards for Infrared Thermography jseffrin Thermal Imaging, Infrared Cameras & Energy Audits 100 2/15/08 11:13 PM
WA State Legislative update hmiller Legislation, Licensing & Legal Issues for Inspectors 153 5/4/07 11:55 PM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 5:57 PM.


Popular Sections

:

All Sections

Inspection News

InterNACHI Membership

Inspection Standards

Inspection Education

InterNACHI Inspectors

Inspection Links

 

 

 

NACHI.ORG Statistics

 

 

no new posts