To all of the Anti-War people...

[klott]

Obama said he is going to go after Osama, where he lives, in his cave's in Pakistan, so that means he is going to broaden the war, to include Pakistan,(which has nuclear weapons) and at the same time, do away with our missile defense shield, does that make you feel safer?

[James H. Bushart]

Originally Posted by klott

Obama said he is going to go after Osama, where he lives, in his cave's in Pakistan, so that means he is going to broaden the war, to include Pakistan,(which has nuclear weapons) and at the same time, do away with our missile defense shield, does that make you feel safer?

Actually, yes.

Ending the search for the imaginary weapons of mass destruction that never really were in Iraq...and putting all of our resources where they really belong, that is .... fighting the Taliban in Afghanistan and Pakistan and those who conducted the attack on New York, is a much better plan, IMO.

BTW, his intention is not to "broaden" the war...but to narrow its focus upon those enemies of the United States that still exist, still maintain control over their weapons and communications, and are still planning attacks on innocent US citizens. I support this to the extent that I would serve under Obama for this cause myself, if allowed to.

[Randy D. Stufflebeem]

Originally Posted by klott

Obama said he is going to go after Osama, where he lives, in his cave's in Pakistan, so that means he is going to broaden the war, to include Pakistan,(which has nuclear weapons) and at the same time, do away with our missile defense shield, does that make you feel safer?

Thats our girl Dopey! Better cling onto your gun Ken!

[Nick Gromicko]

Jim writes:

Ending the search for the imaginary weapons of mass destruction that never really were in Iraq

Wow, that is wonderful news!

I'll tell the tens of thousands of Kurds (men, women and children) that Sadahm killed with his chemical weapons of mass destructin that they aren't really dead.

[Randy D. Stufflebeem]

Originally Posted by gromicko

Jim writes:

Wow, that is wonderful news!

I'll tell the tens of thousands of Kurds (men, women and children) that Sadahm killed with his chemical weapons of mass destructin that they aren't really dead.

BINGO!!!!!!

[James H. Bushart]

Originally Posted by gromicko

Jim writes:

Wow, that is wonderful news!

I'll tell the tens of thousands of Kurds (men, women and children) that Sadahm killed with his chemical weapons of mass destructin that they aren't really dead.

Not those that he used....but those that he was supposedly threatening to use against us and the free world. You remember......all of the rest of the world does.

[Bob Elliott]

Originally Posted by gromicko

Jim writes:

Wow, that is wonderful news!

I'll tell the tens of thousands of Kurds (men, women and children) that Sadahm killed with his chemical weapons of mass destructin that they aren't really dead.

What are you telling the Chinese , North Koreans, Cubans,and people of Darfur?

You know very well , helping the people of Iraq was just the made up excuse after no WMD's were found.

Maybe we can just rewrite history, and claim that was the original reason.

[James H. Bushart]

Originally Posted by relliott

Maybe we can just rewrite history, and claim that was the original reason.

We can't.

If I am not mistaken, he was gassing the Kurds while he was a US ally....during the war between Iraq and Iran.

Most of the crimes he was charged with...and hung for...Saddam did while in the good graces of United States.

[mivie]

Originally Posted by jbushart

Actually, yes.

Ending the search for the imaginary weapons of mass destruction that never really were in Iraq...and putting all of our resources where they really belong, that is .... fighting the Taliban in Afghanistan and Pakistan and those who conducted the attack on New York, is a much better plan, IMO.

And I guess there was no Holocaust!!!

[tdietrich1]

http://www.snopes.com/politics/war/wmdquotes.asp

tom

[James H. Bushart]

Originally Posted by mivie

And I guess there was no Holocaust!!!

Blaming that on Saddam, too? He was only a child at that time and, to my knowledge, not a member of the Nazi regime.

[James H. Bushart]

Originally Posted by tdietrich1

http://www.snopes.com/politics/war/wmdquotes.asp

tom

LOL

Tom....read the first half of the section called "Origins". It defeats your point.

[gbeaumont]

Originally Posted by jbushart

We can't.

If I am not mistaken, he was gassing the Kurds while he was a US ally....during the war between Iraq and Iran.

Most of the crimes he was charged with...and hung for...Saddam did while in the good graces of United States.

Funny old world isn't it? Jim is correct. Iraq under Hussein was a US allie when the States thought it was under threat from Iran and its' ayatollahs

and then the bastards turned our weapons on factions of there own country.

Regards

Gerry

[Nick Gromicko]

And that's the U.S.'s fault that after 8 years Sadahm couldn't win the war against those scumbag Iranians who held U.S. civilians as hostages?

I'd have given Iraq my own personal weapons arsenal to fight Iran.

[Nick Gromicko]

When Iran launches its first nukes and cause nuclear fallout that drifts around the world and kills all the trees, will the environmentalists (of which I'm one) finally say... "Hey, maybe Bush and McCain were right?"

Too late tree hugger.