Anti Gun

[Joseph Burkeson, CMI]

Originally Posted by sstanczyk

It is interesting to note that at no point does the President have a role in the formal amendment process (though he would be free to make his opinion known). He cannot veto an amendment proposal, nor a ratification. This point is clear in Article 5, and was reaffirmed by the Supreme Court in Hollingsworth v Virginia (3 USC 378 [1798]):

Oh, come on now Stephen, you are just gonna piss off John McKenna who was at peace with his Social Studies teacher thinking all the while he was getting himself a proper education.

[Michael Larson]

And when a President Obama signs a bill authored by a Democrat controlled congress adding additional gun types considered "assault weapons" and ammunition considered "too lethal" to existing federal gun laws will the Supreme court be there to stop it?

Think about it and hide your guns and ammo while your at it.

This isn't just about the Second Amendment.

[Joseph Burkeson, CMI]

Originally Posted by mlarson

And when a President Obama signs a bill authored by a Democrat controlled congress adding additional gun types considered "assault weapons" and ammunition considered "too lethal" to existing federal gun laws will the Supreme court be there to stop it?

Think about it and hide your guns and ammo while your at it.

This isn't just about the Second Amendment.

Blah, Blah, bull****! bull****!, Obama, Obama, Blah, Blah!

[Michael Larson]

Originally Posted by jburkeson1

Blah, Blah, bull****! bull****!, Obama, Obama, Blah, Blah!

Too tough you to answer, eh Joey?

[Joseph Burkeson, CMI]

Mudcat Saunders (life long NRA Member) for Barack Obama

[Randy D. Stufflebeem]

Originally Posted by jbushart

Red necks have been making these manipulative claims since the Kennedy administration.

It is how the NRA continues to recruit members and collect large sums of money...by creating the illusion that there is a threat to someone banning AK-47's for squirrel hunting.

A president has no more right or ability to take away a gun than to stop an abortion from taking place. Constitutional issues are interpretted by the Supreme Court...not presidents.

Rednecks a racial slur James! You don't believe in that kind of stuff,,,,,, remember?