Communist Party Support Dems

[John McKenna]

The Communist Party of the U.S.A. support the Democrats and
work hard to get the voters out.

LONG LIVE THE COMMUNIST PARTY!!!
VOTE DEMOCRAT!!!

This link from the Communist web site:
http://www.cpusa.org/article/articleview/770/1/135/

DO IT FOR THE MOTHERLAND... (I'm joking... )

What is wrong with this picture? Why would the Communist
and Terrorist want to support the Democrats so strongly?

[Michael Larson]

Originally Posted by jmckenna1

......... Why would the Communist
and Terrorist want to support the Democrats so strongly?

Why indeed???

[Frank M. Carrio, CMI]

Originally Posted by jmckenna1

The Communist Party of the U.S.A. support the Democrats and
work hard to get the voters out.

LONG LIVE THE COMMUNIST PARTY!!!
VOTE DEMOCRAT!!!

This link from the Communist web site:
http://www.cpusa.org/article/articleview/770/1/135/

DO IT FOR THE MOTHERLAND... (I'm joking... )

What is wrong with this picture? Why would the Communist
and Terrorist want to support the Democrats so strongly?

Just ask the treasonous punk John Kerry. He will have a typical mealy mouthed answer.

If not him, then his left wing sympathetic apologists will came to "the rescue."

Lets all hear it for the Communist Party!!! Hip, Hip....Go F-ck yourself!
</IMG>

[Cheryl Nordby]

How about a lot of people are just tired of war. Tired of killing innocent people. And some may be thinking the GrandOldParty isn't so grand anymore

[Michael Larson]

Originally Posted by cnordby

How about a lot of people are just tired of war. Tired of killing innocent people. And some may be thinking the GrandOldParty isn't so grand anymore

Cheryl, Please give a little thought to the following question:

Do you consider the United States of America a force for good or evil in the world?

Most people in this country would never choose to go to war unless they were convinced that it was necessary.

Other countries choose war for their own purposes.

War is dirty business. But its safe to say that the war in Iraq has been carried out in a manner to avoid as many innocent deaths and injuries as possible. Ask your self who has regard for innocent lives, the terrorists or the U.S military and their allies?

The PeaceNik, cut and run crowd(Democrats) think we can should all just get along. You may not like preemptive War but do you honestly believe there is another way that would not result in innocent deaths of American citizens in this country and abroad? You may wish all you want but someone has to make the hard decisions. And that sometimes includes war.

[jwortham1]

Ahh....it's a beautiful morning.

Just got back from my Pro-Terror, Pro-Communist, Pro-Cut-and-Run-Peacenik vote and I feel great!

(Hope I didn't miss any categorizations you right-wing nut jobs like to use to show how you're the TRUE Americans.)

Looking forward to a great day of GOP defeats and concession speeches.

Isn't voting a wonderful thing?

[Michael Larson]

I guess you won't be calling Hannity and saying "Your a Great American" today.

[Cheryl Nordby]

Hi Michael....thank you for your gentle reply. I think most people thought war after 911 was a good idea. However Osama is still roaming....we have spent billions of dollars we should have spent on homeland security. Violence will most likely only worsen. and unfortunately the revival of nuclear danger means we have already lost.

[Michael Larson]

Originally Posted by cnordby

Hi Michael....thank you for your gentle reply. I think most people thought war after 911 was a good idea. However Osama is still roaming....we have spent billions of dollars we should have spent on homeland security. Violence will most likely only worsen. and unfortunately the revival of nuclear danger means we have already lost.

Osama may or may not be alive but he is only one man. I hope we can prove his demise one day but i suspect we will never know. his organizations lives on and is very active in Iraq. As long as they are there, they are not here in large numbers. Apparently Home Land Security has been rather effective despite those who desire to weaken it(why would they want too?) The sad reality is that there will likely be a another attack on our shores. Our enemies will keep trying and the odds are they will succeed at some time. We survived the "Cold War" by committing as a nation to a strong and deterring defense(Remember the acronym MAD?) Well it worked but now we have a different enemy that is convinced they are doing alah's will. That calls for a change in our tactics. The "War on Terror" will be an ongoing war that I suspect will be decades long just as the cold war was. Unfortunately as you mentioned we now have the nuclear threat revived in a much more manevalant form. Those who want JIHAD will use N-bombs against us. We can only hope that we will continue to be successful in finding and killing or imprisoning those who would do us harm.
There is a chance that if a functioning democracy can be established in a predominantly Muslim country that the tide can be turned. This will be a very long process and deserves our support.

My apologies for rambling on. Some will see this issue differently but I have a very difficult time understanding how they think.

[Cheryl Nordby]

It's ok to ramble. I find it interesting how others think. I do find it difficult to understand how if our security is so good...our president doesn't have more interest in our big city ports. Very little security there. Funny how we can ignore all the transporting daily at these ports. We have destroyed our Foreign relations.....and what's happening with Social Security.

[Michael Larson]

Originally Posted by cnordby

It's ok to ramble. I find it interesting how others think. I do find it difficult to understand how if our security is so good...our president doesn't have more interest in our big city ports. Very little security there. Funny how we can ignore all the transporting daily at these ports. We have destroyed our Foreign relations.....and what's happening with Social Security.

You have raised a great issue with the "ports"

I too think port security is woefully deficient(at least what we can see). I doubt there is any significant percentage of containers that are inspected thouroughly. I don't have any answer save to say that the task is a daunting one.
I do think much is done unseen with "intelligence" methods that we would be unaware of. Most of the "spy" capability we have would be unknown to us. But I sincerely hope its is going on.

As to S.S. - At least give GW some credit for trying to address this important issue. Few other politicians have had the courage to fix it. It has been considered the "third rail" of politics for decades. I remember the "fix" in the 80s when we were all assured that the changes to the retirement age and the increased tax rate would put the system on a sound footing. Well guess what. Wasn't true. Didn't happen. Just an inadequate short term repair that didn't deal with the real problems. It's all about the numbers and most of our political leaders can't add.

[Cheryl Nordby]

I hope we are improving on security as well. Right now I am just having a real hard time finding anything to like about Bush. The war is our single greatest threat to our national security. Costs have gone beyond what anyone thought they would be. More lives have been lost than anyone would have guessed. I know he didn't 'cause' Katrina.' But he certainly failed at the outcome of that as well. He has jeapordized oil supplies. A lot of bad has happended while Bush has been president. No he didn't cause them. But he stirred the pot and made many things worse. Do you consider us to be a well liked nation? He has caused many to realize we need a different course. This 'stay the course' crap clearly is not working. His smirk is not giving the impression of confident anymore. I am just happy he cannot run for president again, eventhough I honestly doubt he would have a chance of winning.

[jferry]

Originally Posted by cnordby

I hope we are improving on security as well. Right now I am just having a real hard time finding anything to like about Bush. The war is our single greatest threat to our national security. Costs have gone beyond what anyone thought they would be. More lives have been lost than anyone would have guessed. I know he didn't 'cause' Katrina.' But he certainly failed at the outcome of that as well. He has jeapordized oil supplies. A lot of bad has happended while Bush has been president. No he didn't cause them. But he stirred the pot and made many things worse. Do you consider us to be a well liked nation? He has caused many to realize we need a different course. This 'stay the course' crap clearly is not working. His smirk is not giving the impression of confident anymore. I am just happy he cannot run for president again, eventhough I honestly doubt he would have a chance of winning.

Perhaps this will help:

low taxes

high tax collections

booming economy

record employment levels

tens of thousands of dead jihadists

N. Korea knuckling under to multi-national talks and getting the message that Clinton-like giveaways are permanently off the table

Gaddaffi disposing of WMDs and rejoining the community of nations

foiling plot to blow up ten US-bound airliners over the Atlantic

no domestic terror attacks since 9/11

falling oil prices ...

Need more? Hit me up.

He would be elected President for life, if there was an intelligence test required to vote.

[Michael Larson]

How about the fact that he puts our nations interests above being "popular"

I would remind you that many gave projections for lost G.I. lives far far in excess of the actual losses we have incurred. Have there been mistakes? Yep, There are in every war. War is never as predicable as we would like.

Jeopardized oil suppies. How?

Why bring up Katrina? It was a natural disaster that the city was unprepared for despite decades of warning. Inaction on the part of the city and the state is far more to blame that the federal government. If a Katrina like event had occurred in any other administration would the response been any better? Tax payer dollars are being wasted through corruption on a daily basis. Let's not forget which party is in control in New Orleans and Louisiana. Do they bear no responsibility?

You may not like "stay the course" but I have seem little of any substative plan for exiting from Iraq that would would not encourage our enemies and allow them to claim victory. Let's not forget that wars are one when one side is vanquished.

[James H. Bushart]

Why don't we take some of these bleeding heart liberals and draw dotted lines around their necks, set them in an Iraqi desert and use them as bait to lure terrorists....

Now, we would not want to rush in too soon...let a few heads roll around until we know the thugs are thoroughly engaged in their work...then send in the Marines. POW. Two birds killed with one stone.