InterNACHI


Go Back   InterNACHI Inspection Forum > General Inspection Topics > Miscellaneous Discussion for Inspectors

Notices

Miscellaneous Discussion for Inspectors Discuss whatever you wish in this forum.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
  #1  
Old 9/13/07, 8:44 PM
Roy D. Cooke, Sr's Avatar
Roy D. Cooke, Sr Roy D. Cooke, Sr is offline
InterNACHI Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Brighton, ON
Posts: 13,926
Default Deck Failures

My biggest fear in Home Inspection is missing a bad deck.
I find most decks are not built properly and I look hard and make sure I miss nothing .
We had one in Canada let go a few years ago with a lot of very important people on it and there was many seriously hurt.

Michael Leavitt has started a new web site on decks have look you will learn a lot .
Information on the deck that fell today in Virginia is on it already .
DECK FAILURE DIRECTORY

The message is ready to be sent with the following file or link attachments:
Shortcut to: http://www.deckfailure.com/Failures.html


Cookie



If I can answer any questions please send me email Roycooke@hotmail.com

On an inspection and need immediate help call my cell 613-827-2011
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 9/13/07, 8:49 PM
Dennis R. Goudreau Dennis R. Goudreau is offline
InterNACHI Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Nashua, NH
Posts: 1,939
Default Re: Deck Failures

Roy
thanks for the link good stuff
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 9/13/07, 10:23 PM
Bruce A. King's Avatar
Bruce A. King Bruce A. King is offline
InterNACHI Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: York, SC
Posts: 3,103
Default Re: Deck Failures

Here is a site with info on how to build one correctly etc...

http://www.pahi.org/how_to_build_a_r...tial_deck.html



B.A. King Home Inspections, LLC
www.BAKingHomeInspections.com
Serving Charlotte NC area and Rock Hill SC areas.
CMI Certified Master Inspector and Independent
704 301-3207



"Discovery consists in seeing what everyone else has seen and thinking what no one else has thought."
- Albert Szent-Gyvrgyi, Nobel Prize for Medicine 1937
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 9/13/07, 11:43 PM
ekartal6 ekartal6 is offline
Active Poster
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Schaumburg, IL
Posts: 1,094
Please Note: ekartal6 is a non-member guest and is in no way affiliated with InterNACHI or its members.
Default Re: Deck Failures

Many "deckaroos" are cutting corners by nailing the header to the home exterior instead of bolting it.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 9/14/07, 4:17 PM
Peter C. Russell's Avatar
Peter C. Russell Peter C. Russell is offline
InterNACHI Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Alton Bay NH
Posts: 3,899
Default Re: Deck Failures

Quote:
Originally Posted by ekartal6
Many "deckaroos" are cutting corners by nailing the header to the home exterior instead of bolting it.
Here's one from yesterday, brand new 3800 square foot home, never lived in and both the front and rear deck were not bolted to the outside rim joist, not to mention they left the OSB sheathing under both decks exposed.

Last edited by prussell; 11/27/07 at 10:07 PM..
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 9/14/07, 6:58 PM
Marcel R. Cyr's Avatar
Marcel R. Cyr Marcel R. Cyr is offline
InterNACHI Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Winslow, ME
Posts: 18,917
Default Re: Deck Failures

With wrong size hangers to boot. ha. ha.

Nice pick up Peter.
Looks like a crack in the foundation too. Hope the water proofing is below grade and adequate.

Marcel
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 9/14/07, 9:09 PM
David P. Valley's Avatar
David P. Valley David P. Valley is offline
InterNACHI Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: METHUEN, MA
Posts: 8,684
Default Re: Deck Failures

Nice sites guys...

Here's a deck that I found which had NO LEDGER BOARD whatsoever. It was attached to the lower 1/2 inch wood trim below the siding.

Nice connection ayyy?

"click to enlarge"
Attachment 14523

Last edited by dvalley; 10/7/07 at 5:40 PM..
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 9/16/07, 10:47 AM
tdietrich1's Avatar
tdietrich1 tdietrich1 is offline
InterNACHI Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Northampton County - Pa
Posts: 1,954
Send a message via Yahoo to tdietrich1
Default Re: Deck Failures

I had an inspection a couple days ago where only lags were used in areas I thought through-bolts should have. Areas of wood were separating with age, and needed tightening. I felt bad for 'flagging' concerns about a year old deck.

tom
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 9/16/07, 11:45 AM
Marcel R. Cyr's Avatar
Marcel R. Cyr Marcel R. Cyr is offline
InterNACHI Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Winslow, ME
Posts: 18,917
Default Re: Deck Failures

Another good article by Dek-Lok.

Join Our DeckLok Newsletter! Click Here Store Locator >> Choose State Alaska California Colorado Connecticut Hawaii Illinois Iowa Kansas Kentucky Maine Maryland Massachusetts Michigan Minnesota Missouri New Hampshire New Jersey New York Nevada North Carolina North Dakota Ohio Oregon Pennsylvania South Carolina South Dakota Vermont Virginia Washington Wisconsin Canada
DeckLok in the Press

Back to the main In The Press Page
Responding to Deck Failures

Dec 2006 DeckWorld Magazine
BY JANET ARDEN
A deck failure can be as simple as a board that gives way or a sag that develops at one corner. It can also be as dramatic as the whole structure pulling off the second story of a house.


You've seen the headlines and heard the news reports:
A deck on a house in the 800 block of South Elm collapsed in the midst of a 30th anniversary party Sunday afternoon, sending five guests to the hospital with various injuries, none serious.


The good news, of course, is that no one was seriously hurt. Unfortunately, that's not always the case. Of the deck collapses that were reported in 2006, 94% resulted in personal injuries. The actual number of deck failures is very difficult to know. Many deck failures go unreported because emergency crews were not summoned or the deck was not occupied at the time it went down. Additionally, decks that were clearly unsafe and were repaired or replaced before they collapsed are not recorded either.


DeckWorld talked at length with Michael Morse, founder and president of DeckLok. Morse has been studying deck construction, building codes, and ways of developing a failure‑proof system for almost 25 years.

Morse points to studies that show over 90% of deck failures are linked to a failure in the connection between the house foundation and the deck. Metal fasteners (whether they are bolts or nails) embedded in wood depend on the resistance of the wood fibers to hold the screw or nail in place, attaching the deck ledger to the house. But this assumes that both the fasteners and the surface they are gripping have the appropriate construction integrity.

For starters, these same metal fasteners offer a pathway for water and then rot in the wood they are supposed to be holding. Seasons of freezing, thawing, and heat cause wood to dry, split, or even rot. Screws may loosen or pop out. Nails provide a much weaker connection to begin with and are more susceptible to popping. As Morse points out, it only takes a slight shift in the surface to begin a lateral pull on nails or screws. For example he points to how easy it is to remove a nail from a piece of wood, once it has started to withdraw. The lesson here, he says, is that once fasteners start to pull out, it does not take much for them to pop the rest of the way.

What about the building code?
According to the International Code Council (ICC), for the most part, "there are no prescriptives for decks in the International Residential Code. They would be treated as floor construction and would follow Chapter 5 of the IRC especially the floor joist spans table."

Specifically, the 2006 International Residential Code, R502.2.2 Decks, stipulates: "Where supported by attachment to an exterior wall, decks shall be positively anchored to the primary structure and de­signed for both vertical and lateral loads as applicable." It goes on to describe attachment methods and structural supports.

At its recent 2006 hearings in Orlando, the International Code Council Code Committee adopted a prescriptive method for attaching the deck ledger to the house, but it does not specify which part of the house this is. It even specifies the number and placement of bolts.

Morse points out, however, that most decks are inspected the day they are complete - when the materials are new and they have not been subject to weather or weight. The damage comes when this same structure has been left in the elements - wet, cold, snow, heat‑for a decade or two.

By Morse's definition, a successful deck is one that remains structurally sound throughout the service life of its wood. Engineering for decks, he says, needs to account for the fact that wood changes over time.
Morse believes there are three key facts to keep in mind in preventing deck collapse:
  1. Follow the load path to the footings. According to the International Code Council's Residential Building Code, the "design must be capable of transfer­ring all loads from their point of origin to the foundation."
  2. Do not assume you have created a structural link if you have not seen the structure. Often‑through no fault of the homeowner or builder‑the deck is not tied to a structural member of the house. The band joist must be specifi­cally attached to resist being pulled out by the deck. The deck ledger may be fastened with the correct number of ap­propriately sized lag bolts, but they may only be holding on to siding or an un­supported band joist. There must be a structural link to the house foundation.
  3. New construction methods that use materials such as manufactured "I" joists do not necessarily tie structurally into the band joist. In this case, a deck can collapse and take the band joist with it.
What about vinyl and composite materials? Vinyl and composite decking materials attach to the same deck underpinnings as wood decking does, but with some differences. The hidden fastener systems these materials use hold decking in one direction, making the stability of the substructure that much more important. Morse says any structure needs to accommodate the characteristics of the new product.

There are no bad guys here. Morse is quick to praise the craftsmanship of deck builders. In fact, he says, most of them do a beautiful job - for 95% of the deck. He believes the last 5% - fastening the deck to the house - is where there's room for improvement.

The following specifications regarding decks is from the 2006 International Residential Code:Section R501.2 Requirements

Floor construction shall be capable of accommodating all loads according to R301 and of transmitting the resulting loads to the supporting structural elements.R502.2.2 Decks.Where supported by attachment to an ex­terior wall, decks shall be positively anchored to the primary structure and designed for both vertical and lateral loads as applicable.

Such attachment shall not be accomplished by the use of toenails or nails subject to withdrawal. Where positive connection to the primary building structure cannot be verified during inspection, decks shall be selfsupporting. For decks with cantilevered framing members, connections to exterior walls or other framing members, shall be designed and constructed to resist uplift resulting from the full live load specified in Table R301.5 acting on the cantilevered portion of the deck.Table R301.5states that decks must be able to support 40 pounds per square foot. Exterior balconies must support 60lbs per square foot.

To learn more, please contact the Intema­tional Code Council, www.iccsafe.org

© DeckWorld Magazine

Marcel
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 9/17/07, 8:45 AM
Peter C. Russell's Avatar
Peter C. Russell Peter C. Russell is offline
InterNACHI Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Alton Bay NH
Posts: 3,899
Default Re: Deck Failures

Quote:
Originally Posted by mcyr
With wrong size hangers to boot. ha. ha.

Nice pick up Peter.
Looks like a crack in the foundation too. Hope the water proofing is below grade and adequate.

Marcel
Good call Marcel, I left that one hanging ( no pun intended ) to see if anyone would catch it. There were many other problems with this house, I'm sure the builder wont be to happy!
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 9/17/07, 8:13 PM
Marcel R. Cyr's Avatar
Marcel R. Cyr Marcel R. Cyr is offline
InterNACHI Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Winslow, ME
Posts: 18,917
Default Re: Deck Failures

Quote:
Originally Posted by prussell
Good call Marcel, I left that one hanging ( no pun intended ) to see if anyone would catch it. There were many other problems with this house, I'm sure the builder wont be to happy!
We have to call it the way we see it don't we? Nothing wrong with that.

Good job Peter, and hope you are keeping busy.
Stay in touch.

Marcel
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 10/7/07, 9:56 PM
Roy D. Cooke, Sr's Avatar
Roy D. Cooke, Sr Roy D. Cooke, Sr is offline
InterNACHI Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Brighton, ON
Posts: 13,926
Default Re: Deck Failures

80% of decks I see are not built correctly .
Please be carefull do not miss writing them up another deck collapsed last night two in hospital .
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Another Collapse Two people were taken to the hospital after a deck in Brooklyn Park collapsed. 20-30 people were standing on a deck of a home Saturday night, when it fell out from under them. Two people were taken to the hospital for their injuries. Hospital officials have not yet revealed the condition of the two people who were injured. Police have not yet determined the cause of the collapse.
The coverage from WCCO and Kare11 was very brief and fact based. The police was only source used in either story. Using the police as a source is intelligent because they do research similar to that of a reporter so the information is pretty reliable, but I would have loved to hear from one of the victims. The sources were authority figures.

............ Cookie



If I can answer any questions please send me email Roycooke@hotmail.com

On an inspection and need immediate help call my cell 613-827-2011
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 10/7/07, 10:33 PM
Joe Funderburk, CMI's Avatar
Joe Funderburk, CMI Joe Funderburk, CMI is offline
InterNACHI Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Hickory Grove, SC
Posts: 7,707
Send a message via Yahoo to jfunderburk
Default Re: Deck Failures

Check out the size of the screws (not bolts) securing this deck ledger to the house. How 'bout the mini joist hanger. I also called for an evaluation of the 4x4 posts without bracing.

deck-failures-100407-042-small-.jpg.jpg
Views:	374
Size:	45.9 KB
ID:	14990 deck-failures-100407-012-small-.jpg.jpg
Views:	230
Size:	72.2 KB
ID:	14991 deck-failures-100407-046-small-.jpg.jpg
Views:	444
Size:	56.4 KB
ID:	14992



“The things that will destroy America are peace at any price,
prosperity at any cost, safety first instead of duty first,
the love of soft living, and the get-rich-quick theory of life.”
Theodore Roosevelt


Joe Funderburk, CMI
Alpha & Omega Home Inspections, LLC
Inspecting Upstate SC & Charlotte Metro, NC
NACHI ID: NACHI05120170
www.aohomeinspection.com



Last edited by jfunderburk; 10/7/07 at 10:37 PM..
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 10/8/07, 7:03 AM
Marcel R. Cyr's Avatar
Marcel R. Cyr Marcel R. Cyr is offline
InterNACHI Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Winslow, ME
Posts: 18,917
Default Re: Deck Failures

Joe;

Are those tapcons?


Marcel
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 10/8/07, 11:46 AM
arussell arussell is offline
Active Poster
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Groveland, Ma
Posts: 175
Please Note: arussell is a non-member guest and is in no way affiliated with InterNACHI or its members.
Default Re: Deck Failures

Quote:
Originally Posted by mcyr
Joe;

Are those tapcons?


Marcel
Good call Marcel.
I asked the same question when I saw the 1st pic. If you look in the upper left corner you can see what appears to be concrete, so I beleive they are (plus being blue as tapcons are).

My real concern, as Joe pointed out in the 3rd pic using too small of a hanger, but also using regaular common nails to attach the hanger and the gap in the ledger board (3rd pic) that the joist is so nicely covering up. That must be a weep hole for the deck! Also the flashing goes behind the ledger and not over the top of the joist to direct the water away from the house.

Joe
Quote:
I also called for an evaluation of the 4x4 posts without bracing.
I agree with you. I don't like using 4x4's for support post. Whenever I have a deck built, I insist on using 6x6's. I've had local building ordinances stipulate the use of 6x6 post on anything over 7' off grade. To me 6x6's look beefier and it allows me to notch them to insert a double 2x beam and bolt the beam to the post.

deck-failures-100_0343-medium-.jpg.JPG
Views:	706
Size:	78.7 KB
ID:	14996

deck-failures-100_0344-medium-.jpg.JPG
Views:	201
Size:	80.4 KB
ID:	14998

alan
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
A little on the Commercial side of things. mcyr General Inspection Discussion 457 8/1/09 11:50 AM
Deck joist blocking/bridging jbancroft Structural Inspections 7 10/4/07 10:16 AM
Deck Question nishanf Exterior Inspections 17 6/2/06 12:18 AM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 7:01 AM.


Popular Sections

:

All Sections

Inspection News

InterNACHI Membership

Inspection Standards

Inspection Education

InterNACHI Inspectors

Inspection Links

 

 

 

NACHI.ORG Statistics

 

 

no new posts