InterNACHI


Go Back   InterNACHI Inspection Forum > General Inspection Topics > Miscellaneous Discussion for Inspectors

Notices

Miscellaneous Discussion for Inspectors Discuss whatever you wish in this forum.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
  #1  
Old 11/27/07, 11:08 PM
John McKenna's Avatar
John McKenna John McKenna is offline
InterNACHI Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Crockett, Tx
Posts: 12,250
Default Are Inspectors Worth What They Charge?

http://www.boston.com/realestate/new...t_they_charge/
By Barry Stone November 27, 2007 Dear Barry,

I'm writing to shred an article on your Web site that deals with home inspector liability. In it you say, "One way that home inspectors have addressed liability is to limit the scope of an inspection to defects that are visible and readily accessible." This seems to be a blanket justification for the failure of home inspectors to report defects. According to the Oxford English Dictionary, inspection is defined as: "View or examine closely and critically especially in order to assess quality for shortcomings. …" Given that definition, home inspectors don't inspect; they express personal opinions. One solution would be for buyers and sellers to conduct their own inspections for obvious defects, instead of allowing home inspectors to pick their pockets. This would help to reduce the escalating costs of buying a home, typically caused by attorneys and others who ride the lucrative real estate gravy train. --Edward

Dear Edward,
The home inspection process is well-defined by the Oxford Dictionary. But shouldn't that definition be limited to conditions that are apparent to the five senses? Or should home inspectors be liable for conditions that are concealed within construction, beneath the ground or behind personal property? To be consistent with your blanket condemnation of the home inspection profession, the Oxford definition could be modified to read, "View or examine closely and critically those conditions that are visible and accessible, as well as those that are not."
The suggestion that buyers and sellers should conduct their own inspections invites an answer that is longer than the space of this column. To summarize, we should consider the following questions:
  • How many buyers and sellers would be able to evaluate the wiring in an electric service panel?
  • Would they recognize conditions involving overfusing, improper grounding, or the use of a breaker panel as a raceway?
  • How many would be willing to crawl through the dank web-infested recesses beneath a house or the dusty darkness of an attic?
  • And if they did so, how many would recognize a significant defect in the foundations or framing?
  • How many could identify faulty plumbing and electrical installations; or evidence of seasonal flooding after the soil below the building had become dry; or noncomplying gas piping, gas unions, or gas valves; or a flue pipe that is too close to combustible materials; or the lack of required ventilation; or inadequate clearance at a chimney?
  • How many could evaluate the functional and safety aspects of a water heater or a furnace?
  • How many could determine the quality, condition and proper installation of a roof, regardless of the type of roof being inspected?
The answers here are obvious. Someone with professional knowledge and experience is needed to provide adequate and reliable information about the conditions in, on, under and around a home. This, of course, does not mean that everyone who assumes the title of home inspector is sufficiently qualified. But among those home inspectors who are qualified, the services they provide are valuable, substantial and not to be compared with the pilfery of a pickpocket.



John McKenna, CMI (TREC #4565)
Executive Director - Master Inspector Certification Board
25 Yrs Constr Exp - 13 Yrs Home Inspector Exp
American Home Inspection - East Texas.

Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 11/27/07, 11:25 PM
James H. Bushart's Avatar
James H. Bushart James H. Bushart is offline
InterNACHI Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Southwest Missouri
Posts: 20,486
Default Re: Are Inspectors Worth What They Charge?

Every inspector is worth his fee.

This is especially applicable to the $125 guy.



James H. Bushart

Professional Building Analyst, BPI
Missouri, Kansas and Arkansas
314-803-2167
Inspecting in Aurora, Branson, Carthage, Granby, Joplin, Kimberling City, Monett, Mount Vernon, Neosho, Nixa, Purdy, Reed Spring, Republic, Springfield and surrounding areas.

Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 11/27/07, 11:31 PM
John McKenna's Avatar
John McKenna John McKenna is offline
InterNACHI Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Crockett, Tx
Posts: 12,250
Default Re: Are Inspectors Worth What They Charge?

I have read in one place that he average home inspection reveals over $1500
worth of defects. I don't know if this is true or not, but I know I usually find
several thousand dollars worth of defects for my clients, before they have to
buy them!!!



John McKenna, CMI (TREC #4565)
Executive Director - Master Inspector Certification Board
25 Yrs Constr Exp - 13 Yrs Home Inspector Exp
American Home Inspection - East Texas.

Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 11/28/07, 12:22 AM
mthomas2 mthomas2 is offline
Active Poster
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Evanston, IL
Posts: 703
Please Note: mthomas2 is a non-member guest and is in no way affiliated with InterNACHI or its members.
Default Re: Are Inspectors Worth What They Charge?

"and others who ride the lucrative real estate gravy train"

Where do I buy my ticket?
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 11/28/07, 12:40 AM
John McKenna's Avatar
John McKenna John McKenna is offline
InterNACHI Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Crockett, Tx
Posts: 12,250
Default Re: Are Inspectors Worth What They Charge?

Quote:
Originally Posted by mthomas2
"and others who ride the lucrative real estate gravy train"

Where do I buy my ticket?
LOL...



John McKenna, CMI (TREC #4565)
Executive Director - Master Inspector Certification Board
25 Yrs Constr Exp - 13 Yrs Home Inspector Exp
American Home Inspection - East Texas.

Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 11/28/07, 12:51 AM
James H. Bushart's Avatar
James H. Bushart James H. Bushart is offline
InterNACHI Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Southwest Missouri
Posts: 20,486
Default Re: Are Inspectors Worth What They Charge?

Buy a ticket to ride the gravy train if you must...but be wary of what you may be expected to sell to remain on board.



James H. Bushart

Professional Building Analyst, BPI
Missouri, Kansas and Arkansas
314-803-2167
Inspecting in Aurora, Branson, Carthage, Granby, Joplin, Kimberling City, Monett, Mount Vernon, Neosho, Nixa, Purdy, Reed Spring, Republic, Springfield and surrounding areas.

Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 11/29/07, 10:35 AM
David A. Andersen's Avatar
David A. Andersen David A. Andersen is offline
InterNACHI Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Woodlawn, TN
Posts: 5,686
Default Re: Are Inspectors Worth What They Charge?

"You can't Inspect what you don't know what your looking at".

If you find something: You need to know "what to do now".

Like a Realtor; a third party can piss people off and "get away with it without blowing the deal".

Just a few of my thoughts of our worth.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Home Inspectors as Deal Killers jmckenna1 Miscellaneous Discussion for Inspectors 17 3/19/10 9:16 PM
$h!# about to hit the inspection industry fan. gromicko Miscellaneous Discussion for Inspectors 27 3/2/07 10:36 PM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 2:15 PM.


Popular Sections

:

All Sections

Inspection News

InterNACHI Membership

Inspection Standards

Inspection Education

InterNACHI Inspectors

Inspection Links

 

 

 

NACHI.ORG Statistics

 

 

no new posts