When Iran's president goes to Bagdad...

[klott]

it would be justice if a roadside IED killed him. I posted this on the public side with the hopes that someone might catch the idea and pass it on to their Mullah. Where's Al Queida when you need them! The ****e's can blame it on the Sunni's and they can blame it on the U.S. Then everybody happy! Just might prevent another war.

[James H. Bushart]

How cowardly.

[Roy D. Cooke, Sr]

Originally Posted by klott

it would be justice if a roadside IED killed him. I posted this on the public side with the hopes that someone might catch the idea and pass it on to their Mullah. Where's Al Queida when you need them! The ****e's can blame it on the Sunni's and they can blame it on the U.S. Then everybody happy! Just might prevent another war.

You say this is justice ?
I wonder when the killing will stop !
Random killing is not my idea of justice.

...Cookie

[klott]

Tell that to an amputee injured by one of Iran's supplied IED's.

[Roy D. Cooke, Sr]

Originally Posted by klott

Tell that to an amputee injured by one of Iran's supplied IED's.

Yep Random killing do work well.

Canadian soldier killed by IED


GRAEME SMITH
Globe and Mail Update
January 23, 2008 at 11:30 PM EST

KANDAHAR, Afghanistan — A Canadian soldier died when a bomb exploded under his armoured vehicle Wednesday, as the military struggles to regain control of a notorious district southwest of Kandahar city.
The improvised explosive device detonated at 1:40 p.m. while bulldozers and troop carriers were trying to clear a safe route through Panjwai district, the scene of many battles between Canadians and insurgents over the past two years.

[John Onofrey]

Some people deserve to die. Akmadinajad is one of them. It would have been nice to meet him at the U.S Embassy in Teheran in April of 1980.

[klott]

He's the most dangerous man on the planet right now.

[bdoles2]

Aaah, another helpful thread started.

[jrivera]

Originally Posted by bdoles2

Aaah, another helpful thread started.

I guess thats a good way to put it. LOL


Mic

[John Onofrey]

Originally Posted by bdoles2

Aaah, another helpful thread started.

The beauty of it is that you get to decide which ones are relevant. If it were the other way around I suppose you would b!tch about that too. Unless, of course, you were the one deciding relevancy for the rest of us.

[bdoles2]

Originally Posted by jonofrey

The beauty of it is that you get to decide which ones are relevant. If it were the other way around I suppose you would b!tch about that too. Unless, of course, you were the one deciding relevancy for the rest of us.

Not ********, just stating the obvious. Your a big boy John, you can decide your own relevancy.

[jrivera]

Maybe the 60's-70's era wasn't a bad thing

PEACE.... Make Love, Not War.......Woodstock!!!


Mic

[Joseph Burkeson, CMI]

I could be wrong, but don't you think that posts whose only purpose is to incite controversy and division without any relevance to home inspection whatsoever (such as this one) are better off placed in the "Not for Everyone" forum?

Originally Posted by Not For Everyone

This is a members-only forum that contains threads that are not for everyone. These may include messages with religious themes, political views, crude humor, or other content that some might find objectionable.

[Jeffrey R. Pope]

Originally Posted by jburkeson1

I could be wrong, but don't you think that posts whose only purpose is to incite controversy and division without any relevance to home inspection whatsoever (such as this one) are better off placed in the "Not for Everyone" forum?

Or not placed at all. . .

[John Onofrey]

Jeez, I don't know. I was kinda going by this:

Misc. Discussion Discuss whatever you wish in this forum.

Note: It doesn't say "Discuss whatever inspection related topics you wish in this forum."