InterNACHI


Go Back   InterNACHI Message Board > General > Misc. Discussion

Notices

Misc. Discussion Discuss whatever you wish in this forum.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
  #16  
Old 8/30/06, 7:14 PM
jferry's Avatar
jferry jferry is offline
Active Poster
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Erdenheim, PA
Posts: 1,622
Default Re: Liable For Fee ONLY Through Arbitration

Quote:
Originally Posted by jferry
In the archive, I answered a question from Justin Watts [jwatts on your search] about E & O. The answer is in the archive. It is also in Paul Hinsperger's "Great Posts" archive and it was widely reported on TIJ.

If Paul would repost his "Great Posts" collection, it would be a great benefit to a lot of our newer members.
Here is Paul's Great Posts link:

http://www.nachi.org/forum/showthread.php?p=727#post727

Here's the link to my E & O post:

http://www.nachi.org/bbsystem/viewto...=181626#181626



Joseph A. Ferry, Esquire
Two Penn Center Plaza
Suite 200
Philadelphia, PA 19102

215-854-6444 tel.
215-243-8202 fax
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 8/30/06, 9:46 PM
Joe Farsetta's Avatar
Joe Farsetta Joe Farsetta is offline
ESOP Committee Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Pearl River, NY
Posts: 3,297
Default Re: Liable For Fee ONLY Through Arbitration

In order for an arbitration clause to be enforced, its first test is that it is not onerous. Suggested language for ADRS is not onerous. The HI pays annually for the service, and the plaintiff pays a reasonable fee to bring action.

38 ADRS cases never moved forward last year after speaking to the potential plaintiff. The process was explained at length, including carefully reviewing the inspection report, recollecting conditions met on the day of the inspection, and examining the SOP the inspector operated under. All sound advice for a plaintff preparing a case pro se. 33 dissapeared after this. In some instances, where a client could have sued, after speaking with ADRS, they chose the route of calm communication with the inspector. Those went away also (5).

ADRS is also non-binding. For some who may not know be aware, arbitration has been challenged and overturned. Some arbitrators have even been sued. We communicate, coach, mediate, and if needed, arbitrate.

In an official lawsuit with a judge, sometimes arbitration is offered as a last resort before trial. Folks had better have a valid reason for rejecting it, or these judges can get pissed off. Not good for the parties. Judges and court admind dont like the system clogged with trivial actions. They want to get rid of them. I have seen cases where arbitration is agreed to in the 11th hour in a courtroom, and the plaintiff and defendent lead to another room with an arbitrator sitting there. Binding arbitration, by the way. Not a whole lot of time, either.

It happens. ADRS is a cost effective alternative that works.

Last edited by jfarsetta; 8/30/06 at 9:49 PM..
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
California arbitration jcahill Legislation, Licensing & Legal Issues 2 11/23/07 12:25 AM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 5:37 PM.


Popular Sections

:

All Sections

Popular

Membership

Inspection Standards

Education

Chapters & Members

Articles & Links

Other Organizations

 

 

 

NACHI.ORG Statistics

 

 

no new posts