InterNACHI


Go Back   InterNACHI Inspection Forum > General Inspection Topics > Miscellaneous Discussion for Inspectors

Notices

Miscellaneous Discussion for Inspectors Discuss whatever you wish in this forum.

 
View Poll Results: Are you comfortable with this language?
Yes 2 11.11%
No 16 88.89%
Voters: 18. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
  #1  
Old 6/4/07, 3:50 AM
jruppert jruppert is offline
New User
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Huntington, NY
Posts: 13
Please Note: jruppert is a non-member guest and is in no way affiliated with InterNACHI or its members.
Default New legislation - PE's versus home inspectors

According to section 2 A. of the draft New York State Code of Ethics, inspectors must have a written contract with their client, which must state the following:

"Home inspectors are not permitted to make any statements or comments concerning the adequacy or soundness of the home, it structure or systems and are not permitted to provide engineering or architectural services."


Please take a minute to answer this poll - your opinion counts. The results of this poll will be given to the New York State Department of State for their consideration relative to license law.

Last edited by jruppert; 6/4/07 at 9:45 AM..
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 6/4/07, 4:41 AM
wforsyth's Avatar
wforsyth wforsyth is offline
Active Poster
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Brinnon, Wa
Posts: 7,860
Please Note: wforsyth is a non-member guest and is in no way affiliated with InterNACHI or its members.
Default Re: New legislation - PE's versus home inspectors

The statement is piggy-backed. You can't answer the question you might want to because of the attachment of the "not permitted to provide engineering or architectural services."

What I mean by that is, someone may want to answer no, they do not agree with the first part of the statement, but then it makes it look like they are agreeing with the opposite of the second part of the statement, which is that home inspectors shouldn't be allowed to provide engineering or architectural services, which is a no-brainer.

So the question appears to be a setup.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 6/4/07, 8:44 AM
Emmanuel J. Scanlan Emmanuel J. Scanlan is offline
InterNACHI Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Josephine, TX
Posts: 1,036
Default Re: New legislation - PE's versus home inspectors

Quote:
Originally Posted by jruppert
According to section 2 A. of the draft New York State Code of Ethics, inspectors must have a written contract with their client, which must state the following:

"Home inspectors are not permitted to make any statements or comments concerning the adequacy or soundness of the home, it structure or systems and are not permitted to provide engineering or architectural services."


Please take a minute to answer this poll - your opinion counts. The results of this poll will be given to the New York State Department of State for their consideration relative to license law.
I do not agree with this:

Quote:
Home inspectors are not permitted to make any statements or comments concerning the adequacy or soundness of the home, it structure or systems
I do agree with this:

Quote:
are not permitted to provide engineering or architectural services.
If the state has already performed its job and identified what are considered engineering or architectural services then all they need is the end portion. As this statement is written it is an obvious attempt at either trying to directly control who can become an Inspector, i.e. only a licensed PE. Or it is setting the stage for a later rule, amendment, etc., to force Inspectors without a PE license out of the business.



Knowledge is power, but sharing knowledge brings peace!

http://www.psinspection.com

TREC License# 7593

Professional Real Estate Inspections for the counties of Collin, Rockwall, Hunt, Dallas, Tarrant, Kaufman and all surrounding areas. If you want the the best you will find it with PS Inspection & Property Services LLC!
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 6/4/07, 8:46 AM
wforsyth's Avatar
wforsyth wforsyth is offline
Active Poster
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Brinnon, Wa
Posts: 7,860
Please Note: wforsyth is a non-member guest and is in no way affiliated with InterNACHI or its members.
Default Re: New legislation - PE's versus home inspectors

Right. So they make it impossible to answer the question.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 6/4/07, 8:49 AM
Roy D. Cooke, Sr's Avatar
Roy D. Cooke, Sr Roy D. Cooke, Sr is offline
InterNACHI Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Brighton, ON
Posts: 14,610
Default Re: New legislation - PE's versus home inspectors

Why would you have a pole that records the names of those who vote .



Need help on inspection call my cell 613-827-2011

I like email Roycooke@hotmail.com

Never wrestle with a pig (however titled) as you just get dirty and the pig has all the fun.



Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 6/4/07, 8:50 AM
wforsyth's Avatar
wforsyth wforsyth is offline
Active Poster
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Brinnon, Wa
Posts: 7,860
Please Note: wforsyth is a non-member guest and is in no way affiliated with InterNACHI or its members.
Default Re: New legislation - PE's versus home inspectors

Because he's turning it into the state and it wouldn't do any good to not have names.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Home Inspector Listings jbowman Miscellaneous Discussion for Inspectors 230 3/21/12 9:35 PM
Common Defects List by Age of House trausch Inspection Education & Training 10 6/12/06 4:52 AM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 4:30 PM.


Popular Sections

:

All Sections

Inspection News

InterNACHI Membership

Inspection Standards

Inspection Education

InterNACHI Inspectors

Inspection Links

 

 

 

NACHI.ORG Statistics

 

 

no new posts