Palin--No Experience

[Randy D. Stufflebeem]

Originally Posted by bkelly2

Well McCain did bring us the Savings and Loan Crisis, so he is good at driving our economy into a ditch.

McCain might do what he thinks is best for the country, it is just that no one really knows what country that is Randy.

Perhaps it is some mythical country exisiting only in McCains head where the economy is strong and the inventer of the Blackberry can't even use one.

Good one Brian!

[Joseph Burkeson, CMI]

Originally Posted by rstufflebeem

Waiting?

Try holding your breath.

[James H. Bushart]

Quite a sizeable collection of taped interviews displaying the ignorance of the VPILF on important issues, here.

Once more, at the time where building momentum is the key to victory....the VPILF is slipping in her popularity polls.

I wonder if the Republicans will actually win BOTH Alaska and Arizona on election day....

[James H. Bushart]

As of just four days ago, her popularity was reduced by 25% in her own state.

Oh, my.

[Russell J. Hensel]

I personally like Obama....People joke about his inexperience...thats what I want in a candidate. I do not want a person who has been in Washington for 26 years to be president. If they cannot fix something in 26 years............GET THE HELL OUT.

Is Bill Gates the best programmer in the world? Hell can he program? Its not what you CAN do, its who you surround yourself with. Hell the President probably has 37 advisors on the best way to prevent diggle berries when wiping.

I do not like the arrogant way of McCain. I prefer the non violent way to come to a resolution. I do not like the way the war is going. To me its like giving you a plan on how to fix your car after running it into a pole. Is it not just easier NOT to run it into the pole? Meaning it was EASIER not to go to war than to find a way to win it. The ramifications of getting rid of Sadam goes much further and deeper than we know. Getting rid of him makes Iran the strong arm of the area....

Lets get to the ROOT of it all.......who started the Homeland security force? Osama Bin Laden...1 man has made us travel differently. Hell an entire branch of the goverment was developed because of him...Homeland security. Think of that..pretty deep. Where did this man come from? Guess where?....Who trained him? Who financed him....The good ole US of A and our boy Ronnie...We reap what we sow. He was trained by the US to start a Jihad against communism and the US backed him up.

Does anyone remember the Keating 5? Does anyone remember McCain ALWAYS agreeing with that idiot Bush?

Sometimes less is more....SOMETIMES...

[nwagner]

Originally Posted by jburkeson1

Obama has campaigned throughout the united states and his party has chosen him above all others to represent them in our two party electoral system, that is the American way.

Obama for bettor or worse was chosen by the American people which is unlike Palin who was simply part of a smudged list hastily penned on a cocktail napkin chosen by a single individual. This is a hard lesson for some for some folks who post here and something that many will have to learn to live with.

LOL! Obama is magically qualified because a bunch of hard liberals nominate the dope over the vile moderate Hillary C*nton and the ambulence chaser Edwards. Some feat that was.

Seriously Joey, you who claims to be a disenfranchised Republican blindly entrusts the judgment of the DNC faithful? Wow, even for you that is quite a stretch.

Am I also supposed to forget that many of these Obamamites are simply rallying behind him because he is running against the evil GOP ticket, not because they believe he is qualified?

As far as Palin, well wouldn't the voters be validating her experience by voting in McBush? Oh wait, it is somehow different because the voters didn't put her on the ticket. As if you would respect her experience anymore if that was the case. Talk about double standards ...

Just maybe you should look inside and wonder why your own party has failed you so miserably, understanding that, it is possible you will see how a candidate such as Obama is leading.

I don't have a party this election. There is no way you will sucker me into voting for either one of these idiots. I guess I can thank you Obamamites for the socialization of our economy, the continued skyrocketing of our energy prices due to attention being diverted to bogus "green" scams and other lovely DNC disasters an Obama/ DNC congress will bless us with ...

[nwagner]

Originally Posted by jburkeson1

I realize there are some really ignorant folks who hang an the NACHI message board, so let me explain.

Obama was chosen by the American public through the primary election process over many months in 50 states to represent the Democratic party as their presidential candidate, that is how we do things here, now, exactly what is it about that fact that you are not aware of.

To contrast that Sarah Palin was not chosen by the American public through any electoral process but by one individual after a 10-minute deliberation.

Understand now?

Neither was Biden, Edwards, Cheney, Lieberman, Gore and so on because the Presidential nominee decides on the VP.

Biden is grossly unqualified to be President. Now following your logic I am right because he wasn't "validated" via an election process over many months in 50 states as their VP candidate. I don't recall Obama vetting the do-nothing, human gaffe machine much either ...

[nwagner]

I'm still wondering if anyone can tell me.
What has Obama accomplished in Illinois or Washington?

Bump.

[Joseph Burkeson, CMI]

Originally Posted by Nicky Wagner

Said basically nothing worthy of comment, but...

Boy what a bunch of BS Nicky, the only question I have for you is... If you are a Democrat, how did you vote in the Primaries? If you ain't a Democrat then you have no business commenting on how the Democrats chose their candidate, or who it was they picked, got it!

[George A. H. Luck]

"People joke about his inexperience...thats what I want in a candidate."

Perhaps the most frightening if not politically ignorant thing I have ever read.

[James H. Bushart]

Originally Posted by gluck

"People joke about his inexperience...thats what I want in a candidate."

Perhaps the most frightening if not politically ignorant thing I have ever read.

Read it again.

It is profound.

It is the mantra of those who believe in term limits and is Jeffersonian in its applicability.

Experience in politics is nothing more than having compromised enough of your own values, betrayed enough of those you have been elected to represent, and availed to enough special interests.....to get re-elected. Nothing more.

Experience means very little in regard to leadership. Character, on the other hand, means everything.

Think about it.

How does McCain's failed mission as a Navy pilot and allowing himself to be captured...make him qualified to Command the most powerful armed force in the history of the planet? It doesn't. But a man with the character of Abraham Lincoln stepped into the job...in the middle of a civil insurrection...and got the job done with only half the generals (the other half going over to the other side).

No one has the "experience" to step into a job like President of the United States. It is not a skill or trade that one "works his way up" to.

It belongs to the man who can inspire others to follow him on a path that he has convinced them is right. This attribute does not come with "experience".

[Brian E. Kelly]

Originally Posted by rstufflebeem

[/b][/color]

As usual it appears this will not be answered. I think you summed it up in comparisons however. Good luck getting your answer!

I can see now why the country is in such a fustercluck, it seems that many of the Rebumbleicans are hard pressed to do any research of their own. It is becomming clear how GW got elected.

The Comprehensive Nuclear Threat Reduction provision

Working with Sen. Hagel and Rep. Adam Schiff, Obama authored this provision, which would require the president to develop a comprehensive plan for ensuring that all nuclear weapons and weapons-usable material at vulnerable sites around the world are secure by 2012 from the threats that terrorists have shown they can pose.

A provision from the Obama-Hagel bill was passed by Congress in December 2007 as an amendment to the State-Foreign Operations appropriations bill.

"It is imperative that we build and sustain a truly global effort under an aggressive timeline to secure, consolidate, and reduce stockpiles of nuclear weapons and weapons-usable material to keep them out of the wrong hands. The comprehensive nuclear threat reduction plan required by this provision is an important step in that effort," Obama said of the provision.

It is all out there as public record.

[Randy D. Stufflebeem]

[quote=bkelly2;418753]I can see now why the country is in such a fustercluck, it seems that many of the Rebumbleicans are hard pressed to do any research of their own. It is becomming clear how GW got elected.

I think, Brian, if you really look hard at this latest fustercluck and put the partison kool-aid aside you may agree McCain wanted to regulate Fannie & Freddie more harshly (I think he even co-sponsered a bill). If you look at who opposed him (there is a video floating around since the press won't play it) that you can watch, Google the facts, and even look at some of the former President (Clinton) says about where the fault should go. If I am wrong thats fine but once again all I see from the New Socialist party is blame it on the republicans and the press following lock step. Pretty Pathetic! Man its almost like pawns following Jim Jones and we know what happened in the end of drinking that kool-aid!

[James H. Bushart]

These are the numbers that are scaring McCain...and they are getting worse as each day goes by. There are several of these floating around, and all of them consistently show the same trend.

There is no way he can make up the lost ground in the next four weeks.

[Joseph Burkeson, CMI]

Originally Posted by rstufflebeem

I think, Brian, if you really look hard at this latest fustercluck and put the partison kool-aid aside you may agree McCain wanted to regulate Fannie & Freddie more harshly (I think he even co-sponsered a bill).

I think it is fairly safe to say that the McCain who "wanted to regulate Fannie & Freddie more harshly" is not the same McCain who has since been schooled & funded by the banksters that are now hawking the Wall Street Bailout. Does that make sense to you?