Saradise Lost

[Joseph Burkeson, CMI]

Ths is an anonymous poll which questions John McCain's vetting of Sarah Palin for the #2 spot on the Republican ticket.

A veritable cornucopia of Palin's problems.

[Randy D. Stufflebeem]

Originally Posted by jburkeson1

The following is an anonymous poll which questions John McCain's vetting of Sarah Palin for the #2 spot on the Republican ticket.

I won't read it anyway but in the spirit of helping someone out, I think they may need a link to what you speak of!

[Michael Larson]

Originally Posted by jburkeson1

Ths is an anonymous poll which questions John McCain's vetting of Sarah Palin for the #2 spot on the Republican ticket.

Once again a leading poll with a missing question.

None of the Above.

Do you write polling questions for the Obama campaign?

How very sad.

[Randy D. Stufflebeem]

Originally Posted by mlarson

Once again a leading poll with a missing question.

None of the Above.

Do you write polling questions for the Obama campaign?

How very sad.

[Christopher Currins]

Originally Posted by mlarson

Once again a leading poll with a missing question.

None of the Above.

Do you write polling questions for the Obama campaign?

How very sad.

Michael , you are a true Republican. When you have a question you cannot or do not want to answer you spin it around and throw it back with a different meaning.

[Joseph Burkeson, CMI]

Originally Posted by mlarson

Once again a leading poll with a missing question.

None of the Above.

Do you write polling questions for the Obama campaign?

How very sad.

So, if it was as you ruminate... None of the above, what then could have been the possible circumstances in which Palin was picked that I did not cover? Please, be as detailed as you like.

[Randy D. Stufflebeem]

Originally Posted by ccurrins

Michael , you are a true Republican. When you have a question you cannot or do not want to answer you spin it around and through it back with a different meaning.

You can't be serious.................can you?

[Michael Larson]

Originally Posted by jburkeson1

So, if it was as you ruminate... None of the above, what then could have been the possible circumstances in which Palin was picked that I did not cover? Please, be as detailed as you like.

How about:

Yes - He knew about her warts & all and went ahead anyway, proving he knows a good candidate when he sees one.

[Michael Larson]

Originally Posted by ccurrins

Michael , you are a true Republican. When you have a question you cannot or do not want to answer you spin it around and throw it back with a different meaning.

Sure I do

What's to answer?

The poll is flawed intentionally to get the results Joey wants.

[Bob Elliott]

Originally Posted by mlarson

Sure I do

What's to answer?

The poll is flawed intentionally to get the results Joey wants.

I agree , as all of the above should have been included.

Who else is with Me and Mike.

[Joseph Burkeson, CMI]

Originally Posted by mlarson

How about:

Yes - He knew about her warts & all and went ahead anyway, proving he knows a good candidate when he sees one.

How could we prove that she is a "good Candidate", what are the qualities of a "good Candidate" and does she possess the qualities?

Very hard questions to answer for sure and that is why there is a vetting process that McCain in his Maverick shoot-from-the-hip style failed to properly execute.

I simply can't possibly believe that knowing today what we all know about Sarah Palin that her name would still be on the table as a possible VP candidate, and neither does anyone else in their right mind.

Convince us otherwise Mikey.

[jachin]

The answer is, McCaine knew all about the warts,he just forgot.
Just like he forgot how many houses he owns

[Steven C. Waskewicz]

This wasn't a poll, in as much as only two answers, intended to create negatives, either way you answered.
Flawed poll in my opinion.

I didn't like any of the answers,

[nwagner]

The Obamamites clearly don't understand the phrase "If you find yourself in a hole, quit digging!"

[Michael Larson]

Originally Posted by jburkeson1

How could we prove that she is a "good Candidate", what are the qualities of a "good Candidate" and does she possess the qualities?

Very hard questions to answer for sure and that is why there is a vetting process that McCain in his Maverick shoot-from-the-hip style failed to properly execute.

I simply can't possibly believe that knowing today what we all know about Sarah Palin that her name would still be on the table as a possible VP candidate, and neither does anyone else in their right mind.

Convince us otherwise Mikey.

I know you're in pain Joe.

It' will get better as you work through the stages of grief.

The stages are:

1. Denial:
   • Example - "I feel fine."; "This can't be happening."
2. Anger:
   • Example - "Why me? It's not fair!" "NO! NO! How can you accept this!"
3. Bargaining:
   • Example - "Just let me live to see my children graduate."; "I'll do anything, can't you stretch it out? A few more years."
4. Depression:
   • Example - "I'm so sad, why bother with anything?"; "I'm going to die . . . What's the point?"
5. Acceptance:
   • Example - "It's going to be OK."; "I can't fight it, I may as well prepare for it."