... They Used the "L" Word!

[kpierce]

Originally Posted by mnahrgang

Ok I'll make it easier for you. Prove any of it wrong.

I can't nor will anyone....ever.

[kpierce]

Originally Posted by mlarson

Are you asking me to prove a negative?

I'll assume you wern't this time.

There is ample evidence for the life of Jesus of Nazareth.
What evidence would you accept?

Anything empirical.

[kpierce]

Originally Posted by mlarson

Are you asking me to prove a negative?

Yes. Just as you did in post #89.

[Michael Larson]

Originally Posted by kpierce

Anything empirical.

That's extremely vague.

Do you realize the number of times that archeology has shown the bible to be correct with reference to individuals and cities when it was claimed earlier that it could not possibly be so?

[kpierce]

Originally Posted by mnahrgang

What year is it?

2008 Anno Domini (in the year of our lord Jesus Chirst). Why?

[kpierce]

Originally Posted by mlarson

That's extremely vague.

Do you realize the number of times that archeology has shown the bible to be correct with reference to individuals and cities when it was claimed earlier that it could not possibly be so?

Enlighten me.

[Michael Larson]

[quote=kpierce;427611]Yes. Just as you did in post #89.[quote]Here is my quote for #89:

Since you're the one claiming the bible is unreliable please demonstrate you contention by giving an example.

It's a large book on many topics so your assistance would be appreciated.

Now where did I ask you to prove a negative?

I was simply asking you to offer something from the bible that you did not agree with. Sorry for any confusion on my part.

[mnahrgang]

Originally Posted by kpierce

I can't nor will anyone....ever.

Good point. Now how about a logical argument that starts with that pre-supposition.

Kevin can not, nor does he believe, that anyone, can or ever will prove even part of the Bible wrong.

Therefore, only those parts of the Bible that can be proven to be true either already have been, or will be in the future.

Therefore, only those parts that cannot be proven true or false must be accepted or rejected based upon faith in the credibility of the information.

Therefore, since everything that can be proven to be true either has been or will be, then those things that can't be proven to be true may be accepted as such based on the proven credibility of the other parts.

In summary, the Bible is true. QED

Now that that's out of the way, what were we talking about before you brought up this discussion on people of faith not accepting evidence and facts?

[Michael Larson]

Originally Posted by kpierce

Enlighten me.

There are many.

How about verification of the falling of the walls of Jericho?

[mnahrgang]

Originally Posted by kpierce

2008 Anno Domini (in the year of our lord Jesus Chirst). Why?

You think that most of the free worlds population would generate a calendar based off the birth of Buggs Bunny?

BTW, its Christ, not Chirst

This has been a busy week. I'm off to bed. You can argue in circles with Mike.

[Joseph Burkeson, CMI]

Originally Posted by relliott

Bullies throughout history hide behind the cross, but burn in the end.

Hatred has blinded the Republican mindset.

If they are not hiding behind the cross they are hiding behind the flag... Mission Accomplished!

[Joseph Burkeson, CMI]

Originally Posted by mlarson

Of course not.

Listen, you either believe taking wealth from those who have to give to those who don't is Socialism or you don't.

IMHO you can't find enough lipstick to put on that pig to make it pretty.

And just where did Bush get the money to bail our the frigging banking whores & fat cat Wall Street executives, if anyone is a pinko socialist it is George Bush.

[kpierce]

Originally Posted by mnahrgang

Good point. Now how about a logical argument that starts with that pre-supposition.

Kevin can not, nor does he believe, that anyone, can or ever will prove even part of the Bible wrong.
Nor will anyone ever prove it right.
Therefore, only those parts of the Bible that can be proven to be true either already have been, or will be in the future.
Already have been? Which ones? Everyone can pray and hope I guess. But we all now pray and hope have nothing to due with facts and logic.
Therefore, only those parts that cannot be proven true or false must be accepted or rejected based upon faith in the credibility of the information.
What information?
Therefore, since everything that can be proven to be true either has been or will be,
When? How?
then those things that can't be proven to be true may be accepted as such based on the proven credibility of the other parts.
What other parts?
In summary, the Bible is true. QED

Now that that's out of the way, what were we talking about before you brought up this discussion on people of faith not accepting evidence and facts?

I can't remember after my brain got twisted in knots.

[kpierce]

Originally Posted by mnahrgang

You think that most of the free worlds population would generate a calendar based off the birth of Buggs Bunny?

BTW, its Christ, not Chirst

This has been a busy week. I'm off to bed. You can argue in circles with Mike.

Geez Mark, sorry about the typo.

[kpierce]

Originally Posted by mnahrgang

You can argue in circles with Mike.

At least, in the end, you understand where this debate goes. I tried to point that out in the beginning.