Free mailing labels and postage for anyone wanting to write Kansas legislators.

[John McKenna]

Originally Posted by psabados

Uh, Friar. You need to repent.

I am not begging or demanding NACHI's money for my agenda,
you are.

[Nick Gromicko]

That whole vendor thing was mostly my fault. My instructions were not to be fair. My instructions were, in fact, to be brutal.

[Paul Sabados]

OK, so you did lie and called us all liars. Now that makes you the liar

Turdnade blew up and now you're covered in it. See I told you it wouldn't take long.

[John McKenna]

Originally Posted by psabados

OK, so you did lie and called us all liars. Now that makes you the liar

Turdnade blew up and now you're covered in it. See I told you it wouldn't take long.

I have not called any member you referenced a liar.
So you lie when you said I did.

Yes... I called you a liar now.

Witty and twisting comments are not your speciality.

[Paul Sabados]

Not witty, just facts. You lied, oh wait a minute, your just stretching and your post is present for the facts. So you're witty? I suppose you could be half right.

[Paul Sabados]

That whole vendor thing was mostly my fault. My instructions were not to be fair. My instructions were, in fact, to be brutal.

And who exactly did you give those instructions to?

[John McKenna]

Originally Posted by psabados

Not witty, just facts. You lied, oh wait a minute, your just stretching and your post is present for the facts. So you're witty? I suppose you could be half right.

The facts are you were missing 50% of the story because you
never heard from both sides. Case dismissed for lack of evidence.

[Paul Sabados]

You know, someone can be convicted of murder even though the body was never found.

[John McKenna]

Originally Posted by psabados

You know, someone can be convicted of murder even though the body was never found.

But if any evidence or witness is available and just ignored, the
prosecution will loose it's case, especially if the accused is
never questioned to tell his side of the story.

If you were the accused, you would agree with me.

Your worse than some preachers I know.

[Paul Sabados]

No, that I wouldn't agree on. It appears that the accussed is fearing to take the stand and might incriminate himself to a higher degree. No testimony on behalf of the accussed has been presented to the contrary at this time.

Besides, this should be discussed on the thread two lines above this thread. Let's get back to the licensing issue. I'm getting the feeling you need to soar some more tonight.

[John McKenna]

Originally Posted by psabados

No, that I wouldn't agree on. It appears that the accussed is fearing to take the stand and might incriminate himself to a higher degree. No testimony on behalf of the accussed has been presented to the contrary at this time.

Besides, this should be discussed on the thread two lines above this thread. Let's get back to the licensing issue. I'm getting the feeling you need to soar some more tonight.

The accused has been found guilty by a lynch mob before he was
called to testify. It's worse than a bunch of old gossips in church.

Switching to another subject might be your best move, go ahead...

[Paul Sabados]

Nope not switching just getting off of the drift. Take it up two and I will happily engage you there.

Now are you picking on the Church Ladies? Your soaring days are numbered

[jvogan]

Paul, don't give the Reverend (oh, I know, NO ONE has ever called me Reverend) the validity of trying to present your opinion and expecting to convince him, or for him to even respect it, for that matter. Every time you reply to his self-serving posts, you only provide the pulpit for him to shout from. You suffer, and are at a disadvantage, from having to have your arguments MAKE SENSE. He does not suffer from this restriction. He suffers from only his desire to keep the cash from NACHI flowing in to his classroom. I blame no one for not agreeing with my point of view, and actually enjoy a good, HONEST, open debate of issues. You will not get that from the Reverend. But the last time I checked, the $289 I pay my dues with, and you pay your dues with, are just as green as the ones that he pays his dues with...and give any member the right to debate the direction OUR association is taking. Don't validate this moron by letting the Nachi Member of the Year for 2005 to be drug into a name calling contest and a "did not, did too, did not, did too" debate. That is all you will get from him. Take my advice, ignore him.

Just my 2 cents worth!

Now, let the mayhem resume!!!

[Blaine Wiley]

Originally Posted by psabados

Nope not switching just getting off of the drift. Take it up two and I will happily engage you there.

Well, except that the thread has been deleted...again...

It must have swerved into either truth or consequences.

[James E. Braun, CMI]

Originally Posted by jmckenna1

I believe nothing until I verify both sides, regardless of membership.
Now I know not to believe you or your lack of moral character
and sense of justice. I have called no one a liar and you know it.
But I will not pass judgment based on one sided stories that
are posted on the forum. You have got to be kidding.

Well somebody is lying, it is those NACHI members or Peter. So which is it John?
I have sued several renters before and when they was asked to appear and did not, the judge ruled in favor of me. Why do you think the judge did that? According to your logic, if Tafeen would not have shown up for court, he would not be a convicted felon now. You have been drinking too much of your sacramental wine, John. A man needs to defend himself when he is innocent.