InterNACHI


Go Back   InterNACHI Inspection Forum > General Inspection Topics > Legislation, Licensing & Legal Issues for Inspectors

Notices

Legislation, Licensing & Legal Issues for Inspectors Use this forum to discuss current and proposed legislation on home inspector licensing, and other legal issues affecting home inspectors. Inspectors from all associations welcome.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
  #1  
Old 5/15/07, 11:08 AM
Nick Gromicko's Avatar
Nick Gromicko Nick Gromicko is online now
InterNACHI Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Valley Forge, PA
Posts: 29,299
Default New law in Minnesota requiring all new homes to be built radon-resistant.

New law looks to zap radon from new homes

By Jeff Hansel
The Post-Bulletin
A new law passed by the Minnesota Legislature will require all new homes built in the state to include mitigation against radon.
Why is that important?
"Radon is the second leading cause of lung cancer in the U.S., and about half of Olmsted County homes have radon levels that exceed the Environmental Protection Agency Action Level," says the Olmsted County Public Health Web site.
"This general region of the country is identified by EPA as a high-radon-potential area, and Olmsted County is in that area," said Dan DeLano, a registered environmental health specialist with county public health. "Based on the testing results we see in our lab, that's true. About 50 percent or more of the homes test at or above EPAs action level -- that includes new housing."
But, he cautioned, "you can build a home resistant, and it can still have elevated radon levels."
What will the law do?
The bill, SF1735, was authored by Rep. Kim Norton, DFL-Rochester. It was signed into law by Gov. Tim Pawlenty on May 4.
It requires the commissioner of labor and industry to adopt new rules for radon control for all new residential buildings.
Those rules will become part of the Minnesota State Building Code.
Existing homes aren't covered. The cost of retrofitting is much higher than the initial cost of keeping radon levels below dangerous levels.
"Get your home tested. That's the biggest thing you can do," said Kyle Ravert, a geologist with OMNI Environmental of Rochester, which tests homes during the sales process. "It's odorless, it's tasteless. You can't see it."
Homes in Olmsted County have been shown to have high radon levels, Ravert said. But not all homes have a problem with radon. Ravert had his own home tested, and it had low levels.
"The only way to know if you have high radon is to have your home tested," he said.
When does the law affecting new home construction take effect?
Aug. 1.

Information
For more information about radon, go to www.co.olmsted.mn.us/health/radon_testing.asp. To learn if your home has dangerous levels of radon, call 285-8370 and ask for a radon kit.



Nick Gromicko, Certified Master Inspector

Find a Home Inspector
"Just as iron sharpens iron, one man sharpens another." Proverbs 27:17
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 5/15/07, 12:05 PM
Jason A. Sieg, CMI's Avatar
Jason A. Sieg, CMI Jason A. Sieg, CMI is offline
InterNACHI Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Davison, MI
Posts: 839
Default Re: New law in Minnesota requiring all new homes to be built radon-resistant.

I am going to be a broken record here.

This would help in the promotion of having a new home built with a PWFS. PWFS cost around 1/2 of what it cost for a traditional foundation to be built and by design they are already prepped for Radon Mitigation. The only additional work or cost would be for a fan & vent pipes.

If a double sided slip joint (you may call it a vapor barrier) is not installed, then the PWFS is not built correctly.

PWFS are simple to build and cost less then traditional foundation systems but, you need to follow the engineering plan.



Jason Sieg, CMI
Davison, MI
NACHI05091399


Knowing the current condition,
to make a wise decision.

President, Great Lakes-East Chapter
Join NACHI Great Lakes - East Chapter

http://mi.nachi.org/greatlakes-east/about.html
ssieg@gfn.org
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Final review of Newman's radon references! Caoimhín P. Connell Ancillary Inspection Services & Additional Topics 12 10/4/08 1:23 PM
Anti-radon modifications inspired by Rochester man's ordeal gromicko IAC2 Indoor Air Forum 2 5/22/07 4:33 PM
Canadians for Properly Built Homes (CPBH). New Home Warranty. gromicko Canadian Inspectors 2 2/24/07 10:16 PM
Ottawa to stiffen radon guidelines. gromicko Canadian Inspectors 1 8/16/06 6:28 AM
Common Defects List by Age of House trausch Inspection Education & Training 10 6/12/06 5:52 AM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 1:32 PM.


Popular Sections

:

All Sections

Inspection News

InterNACHI Membership

Inspection Standards

Inspection Education

InterNACHI Inspectors

Inspection Links

 

 

 

NACHI.ORG Statistics

 

 

no new posts