New warnings have been added to the top of every page of "Not For Everyone" forum.

[Joseph Burkeson, CMI]

Originally Posted by mbazzo

O.K. I'll bring a step stool so you can look me in the eyes.....

Need my address, I'll keep a light on for you, coward, bring your priest too.

[rmaday]

Originally Posted by jmckenna1

Do you monitor anything your kids see or hear?
We all know the answer...

What's that supposed to mean?

You want to denate parenting, call me I'll debate it all day with you.
847-254-5358

Lets say for an instance that a child comes home from lunch, wakes from a nap, or any other activity and wants to see her father who happens to be reading the NFE section.

Child walks in and says, "Daddy, what are you doing?"
Father says, "Just finishing up so I can play with you"

As he finishes reading the first post in a thread about the outburst in the Senate he and his daughter see the picture in the second post.

If you can't see the issue with that, I don't know what else to say.

[Michael Bazzo, CMI]

Originally Posted by jburkeson1

Need my address, I'll keep a light on for you, coward, bring your priest too.

Mapquest is my friend. Good night spanky

[John McKenna]

Originally Posted by jbushart

You are the one who...when you learned of the police investigation regarding your posting of an obscene image of a child's genitals....changed your description of the photo from a baby to a "fetus". No one else did. Just you.

Nick has been consistent with his "medical waste" description.

Nick has stated that abortion is murder to some and medical waste by the law.
Your not reading.

I have broken no laws and I deleted my post just to prove you did not really
care about the abortion image. I was right.

You know why?

THE IMAGE IS STILL THERE and YOU DON'T CARE and SAY NOTHING.
You prove my point. You only want to attack me. Many have told you
this many times.

You also said you were contacting the gov't about me because I was a dangerous
terrorist like Tim McVeigh. Your really loosing your mind over this.

I am still here and the feds and police have note bothered to contact me.. LOL.

[John McKenna]

Originally Posted by rmaday

What's that supposed to mean?

You want to denate parenting, call me I'll debate it all day with you.
847-254-5358

Lets say for an instance that a child comes home from lunch, wakes from a nap, or any other activity and wants to see her father who happens to be reading the NFE section.

Child walks in and says, "Daddy, what are you doing?"
Father says, "Just finishing up so I can play with you"

As he finishes reading the first post in a thread about the outburst in the Senate he and his daughter see the picture in the second post.

If you can't see the issue with that, I don't know what else to say.

Do you monitor anything your children see or hear?

If the answer is YES, then please continue to be diligent with your
children regarding the internet.

[James H. Bushart]

Originally Posted by jmckenna1

Your not reading I have broken no laws and I deleted my post just to prove you
did not really care about the abortion image. I was right.

You are no hero, Bubba.

You backed away from your "cause" when you knew you had law enforcement officials looking at what you posted. You removed the obscene image, replaced it with a link to a less developed child, and posted a warning. According to your post, you did this after speaking with Nick on the phone.

You did not do this when the father of the 4 1/2 year old girl told you of his daughter's unwanted exposure to the obscene image you had originally posted. You told him that it would be good for her and her future decisions to "choose life". You left it there for the children of other members to view.

But when you saw that you could possibly be in trouble....you quickly removed the image and referred to it as a "fetus".

You have shamed yourself on many fronts, Bubba. You are no hero to anyone.

[Joseph Burkeson, CMI]

Originally Posted by mbazzo

Mapquest is my friend. Good night spanky

Later.

[John McKenna]

Originally Posted by jbushart

You are no hero, Bubba.

You backed away from your "cause" when you knew you had law enforcement officials looking at what you posted. You removed the obscene image, replaced it with a link to a less developed child, and posted a warning. According to your post, you did this after speaking with Nick on the phone.

Nick never ask me to delete the image and he has still not deleted
the same images that remain. Your dreaming. The police have
never contacted me and Nick is not breaking any laws. Your
loosing it.

You did not do this when the father of the 4 1/2 year old girl told you of his daughter's unwanted exposure to the obscene image you had originally posted. You told him that it would be good for her and her future decisions to "choose life". You left it there for the children of other members to view.

I said that perhaps the child would grow up pro life. I never said it
was good that a parent did not monitor their child's access to the
internet or that the child saw something the parent found offensive.
I would always advise parents to monitor their children.

But when you saw that you could possibly be in trouble....you quickly removed the image and referred to it as a "fetus".

After I saw that Nick would leave the photos, that STILL REMAIN,
I deleted mine to show that you did not really CARE about the
photos. You only wanted to attack me. I was right.

You have shamed yourself on many fronts, Bubba. You are no hero to anyone.

OK... you don't like and you didn't get your way. Now your mad.
What else is new?

I notice that you have modified your verbiage when speaking with
me and that is refreshing. Keep up the good work.

I know you are laying in wait to attack me, but I don't mind.
Have a nice day.

[rmaday]

Originally Posted by jbushart

Cool.

Now that this is a political thread that is not going NACHI's way, it can be removed from the public domain and reposted in the NFE.

Good move, Nick.

I don't mind if people find this and know that I think posting a picture of a dead, dismembered, naked child is inapropriate on a professional message board in any forum or thread. Let alone a thread about a senator.

I also don't mind if people find this and know that I think that a four-year old should never see a picture of a dead, dismembered, naked child.

I'm sure that those defending the pic and suggesting that it is a good thing for a child to see that won't mind if it stays here either.

[Frank Magdefrau]

Originally Posted by rmaday

When informed that a 4 year old had seen the pic, not only was it not taken down, but two members defended it implying that it was somehow a "good thing" for the child to see.

I do not agree that the photo was a good thing for a 4 year old to see.

That was the fault of the 4 years olds parent, but that is just my opinion, of course.

[John McKenna]

Originally Posted by rmaday

I don't mind if people find this and know that I think posting a picture of a dead, dismembered, naked child is inapropriate on a professional message board in any forum or thread. Let alone a thread about a senator.

I also don't mind if people find this and know that I think that a four-year old should never see a picture of a dead, dismembered, naked child.

I'm sure that those defending the pic and suggesting that it is a good thing for a child to see that won't mind if it stays here either.

James and Joey have not ask for the remaining photo to be removed.
James is saying one thing, but his actions show he does not care if
the photo remains.

I know you love your child and I am sure that you will forever be
careful when viewing an abortion discussion on a restricted thread.

I know I would.

[rmaday]

Originally Posted by jmckenna1

James and Joey have not ask for the remaining photo to be removed.
James is saying one thing, but his actions show he does not care if
the photo remains.

I know you love your child and I am sure that you will forever be
careful when viewing an abortion discussion on a restricted thread.

I know I would.

Yes I will.

I know now to be just as careful when reading a thread about politicians, here.

[Steven J. Wessler]

I know most of you won't care, but this crap is the reason why I don't visit as much as before. I don't post alot, because someone here once told me to listen alot and post when you have a reliable answer.
Can we get back to what this forum is all about, (discuss current and proposed legislation on home inspector licensing, and other legal issues affecting home inspectors.)

[Frank Magdefrau]

Originally Posted by psmothers

When the 4 year olds parent opens a post about health care and something a senator shouted they do not expect to see the picture that was posted... .

Maybe not but that is why it was labeled NOT FOR EVERYONE.

[Joseph Burkeson, CMI]

Originally Posted by jmckenna1

James and Joey have not ask for the remaining photo to be removed.
James is saying one thing, but his actions show he does not care if
the photo remains.

I know you love your child and I am sure that you will forever be
careful when viewing an abortion discussion on a restricted thread.

I know I would.

Johny, The photo you posted, do with it what you please, it ain't mine.