A thread for serious discussion of Washington Senate bill 5778

[Stephen W. Stanczyk]

Originally Posted by jclark1

Why yes, wendy, it's called a commitee and that's where legislation is first introduced then discussed and voted on. If it passes the commitee vote then it is introduced to the full body. Pretty basic high school civics. I would think that you, being such an expert on all things legal, legislative, business, home inspection, etc. etc related, would already be familiar with this idea.

James, it appears you have decided not to renew your membership. While I have enjoyed our private conversations and your battles with Wendy and others, you have chosen to no longer be a member. So please move on. It is time to stop posting and leave NACHI business to NACHI members. Best of luck to you.

Steve

[lcapaul]

Originally Posted by jburkeson1

That only proves I'm human, you on the other hand still remain a dickhead.

We here in Florida are still waiting with baited breath for you to influence our lawmakers on your enlightened view of licensing. By the way, those Washington inspectors who are concerned over dickheads's two-year proposal should push for a four-year requirement and wait for DH's inevitable flip-flop.

Are yu really as stupid as you sound Joe, or are you just putting on an act?

How would you ever know what I was doing in Florida, the same things I send to Missouri could be carbon copied to Florida.

It's more enjoyable to mess with Bushart, at least he has some brains, you on the other hand are a total waste of time for anyone who attempts to communicate with you.

But I am impressed by how well you type, considering that you do it while holding your d@ck in your other hand.

[James H. Bushart]

Lewis,

The last sentence of your previous post violates the message board rules and, accordingly, the COE. No formal complaint has been made by anyone who may be offended by your post, but I am asking you to please delete it or, at the very least, modify it.

[bkelly1]

Originally Posted by jbushart

Lewis,

The last sentence of your previous post violates the message board rules and, accordingly, the COE. No formal complaint has been made by anyone who may be offended by your post, but I am asking you to please delete it or, at the very least, modify it.

And you didn't see any violations on the last page of this thread? Slanted, to say the least.

[Joseph Burkeson, CMI]

Originally Posted by lcapaul

Are yu really as stupid as you sound Joe, or are you just putting on an act?

How would you ever know what I was doing in Florida, the same things I send to Missouri could be carbon copied to Florida.

It's more enjoyable to mess with Bushart, at least he has some brains, you on the other hand are a total waste of time for anyone who attempts to communicate with you.

But I am impressed by how well you type, considering that you do it while holding your dick in your other hand.

You are completely transparent, it is obvious to everyone what type of repugnant human being you are by pushing licensing requirements you already meet, but I have no doubt that if the requirements were beyond the level of your puny credentials you would squeal like a school girl claiming unfair trade practices.

I hope this blows up in your face, as far as Florida go... they can't write license legislation that I can't meet dickhead so do your worst!

[Harold E. Miller]

Originally Posted by jbushart

Lewis,

The last sentence of your previous post violates the message board rules and, accordingly, the COE. No formal complaint has been made by anyone who may be offended by your post, but I am asking you to please delete it or, at the very least, modify it.

You have got to be kidding Bushart...So Lewis has to constantly take it on the chin from others....but he can't dish it out....I suppose all the expletives spelled with *#! by Joe B and others is acceptable? .....that is totally slanted.

[Harold E. Miller]

I am glad you guys really want to talk about the issues....

[gdomagala]

The last several postings are exactly why I don't read these message boards very often.

[Joseph Burkeson, CMI]

Originally Posted by hmiller

You have got to be kidding Bushart...So Lewis has to constantly take it on the chin from others....but he can't dish it out....I suppose all the expletives spelled with *#! by Joe B and others is acceptable? .....that is totally slanted.

All animosity aside, Lewis (AKA dickhead) takes it on the chin for his diligent continued efforts to use legislation to secure his market while excluding his competition (AKA his fellow NACHI members).

I believe Lewis owes every NACHI member an apology for his behavior and a written commitment that he will cease attempting to use the lawmakers in our country to eliminate his competition, nothing less will do.

BTW Here is dickhead's latest email to me...

Originally Posted by lcapaul

Birds of a feather Joe, maybe you should kiss up to Farsetts a little more, if that were possible, you might make it on the Committee, you seem to fit with most of them, jsut another bigoted asshole, you are only a minor god thogh JOe.

Funny for every little red square yu jerks give, I get two greens, I wonder what that means.

As far as making it through the year, several of us have a bet on that, how many can the ESOP Committee disappear?

With members like you, JB, FC, JF and yur little group who would really give a **** if they were no longer a member of the same Association.

Take part in any good feeding frenzies on the message board lately Joe? Made any more "friendly" phone calls? You and your little circle jerk club, what a ****ing joke, are you sure you and your buddies aren't hiding in the closet? When an idiot like Wendy joins your group it does a lot for your reputation, many of us believe she fits right in with the JB's.

Keep it up, everytime your pack attacks someone, a few more people realize what assholes you are. Keep up the good work.

Several of us forward your little group's PM's and emails around for amusement, we were going to add NIck to our forwarding list so he could get a laugh too, and see how his boy's and the new girl are doing.

[lcapaul]

Originally Posted by jbushart

Lewis,

The last sentence of your previous post violates the message board rules and, accordingly, the COE. No formal complaint has been made by anyone who may be offended by your post, but I am asking you to please delete it or, at the very least, modify it.

Explain the term "Dickhead" to me James and why that would not be offensive to some members, isn't a dick a dick whether it's a "dickhead" or a "dick in hand"?

To use one of "Burkeson's" favorite terms "He started It", so other than the fact that Joe B. is one of your pack, tell us the difference between a "Dickhead" and a "Dick in hand" and I will gladly modify my post.

[lcapaul]

Originally Posted by jburkeson1

All animosity aside, Lewis (AKA dickhead) takes it on the chin for his diligent continued efforts to use legislation to secure his market while excluding his competition (AKA his fellow NACHI members).

I believe Lewis owes every NACHI member an apology for his behavior and a written commitment that he will cease attempting to use the lawmakers in our country to eliminate his competition, nothing less will do.

BTW Here is dickhead's latest email to me...

And here's one of Joe B's more mild PM's:

Private Message: Fu@k Off
[IMG]images/2006/statusicon/post_old.gif[/IMG] 1/22/07, 7:54 AM
[IMG]image.php?u=49&dateline=1136037625[/IMG] Joseph T. Burkeson [IMG]images/2006/statusicon/user_online.gif[/IMG] vbmenu_register("postmenu_", true);
Square-One Inspection Service, LLC [IMG]images/2006/misc/homepage.gif[/IMG]
NACHI Member
[IMG]images/2006/reputation/reputation_pos.gif[/IMG]
User Name: jburkeson1
Location: Riverview, FL
Posts: 1,282

[IMG]images/icons/icon1.gif[/IMG] Fu@k Off
Listen real close pea-brain, harold was the one fu@king around on my website first so go fu@k yourself. If you think you have a case regarding the COE bring it *****hole.

[James H. Bushart]

Perhaps the senator you have been corresponding with in an attempt to impress her with your legislative credibility will explain it to you. I just emailed her a copy of your question (perhaps). Or, perhaps, she will read it on her own. In either event, your meltdown is a matter for record. Leave out the references to sexual acts from your posts, please. This is not a "marketing" thread, for crying out loud.

[Joseph Burkeson, CMI]

Well the obvious differences between my posts & emails and dickheads posts & emails is that I threaten no one, and if anyone doesn't like that... well they can fu@k off too.

Here is another one of Lewis's messages to me, a bit alcohol laden no doubt, but the message that he is diligently working against NACHI members rings through loud & cleer.

Originally Posted by lcapaul

How many Home Inspectors are there in Florida Joe? How many home buyers? A Florida KIRO would have the same effect as it did here, the politics of fear work very well and its easy to convince the public that they are in danger of being screwed by unregulated HI's, I don't need to target any "faction", I only need to target the public and a few legislators.

Your system seems to be working so well, here in Washington the Bill will pass, there is no great opposition to legislation in Montana either, in fact most inspectors there, like Washington, and NACHI members favor regulation, Washington and Montana, what will that make 34, your plan is working great, if your plan is to get HI regulation passed.

You should make up some more statistics to prove your point, I've noticed that you are very creative that way, yet can never answer where they came from, kind of like the Liberal Idaho thing, that's funny, a State where every radical christian group is moving too, where we've had the Ayrian Nations, Ruby ridge, and more libertarians on the ballots than Democrats, you should do like I suggested to your buddy Windy, take a deep breath hold for a second or two and then blow real hard, maybe it would pop your head out of your ***.

It's not the TIJ website dickhead, it's one where you were defending yourself a short time ago telling everyone that no one can say you are a bad inspector because you have ICC and all that crap after your name, all those "qualifications" only show that you shouldn't have an excuse for doing a bad inspection, not proof that you do any good ones, you're as admired there as you are here, but then they're the same admirerers aren't they? The toop of monkys, Monkey See, Monkey DO.

[Peter Doane]

What really irks me is the fact that this thread is titled "A thread for serious discussion of Washington Senate bill 5778" but we have HI's from other states that choose to bash each other (PUBLICLY I MIGHT ADD) on/ in a subject thread that is supposedly a serious discussion about legislation taking place here in Washington State. Its not in a member only forum, its is readable to anyone who chooses to come here. NOT JUST NACHI members.
I get so friggin irritaded logging on here to read/ find important information but have to dredge through all the crap being slung at eachother. Grow up.
Let me finish by saying, I don't have a problem with men having a heated argument or debate but do it with dignity and respect to not only who this thread was meant for , but to the organization you belong to, your public comments to each other are not only childish but hurts everyone's reputation as PROFESSIONAL business owners. Call eachother, hash it out, send an email but keep it off the public space. Please....

[lcapaul]

Originally Posted by jbushart

Perhaps the senator you have been corresponding with in an attempt to impress her with your legislative credibility will explain it to you. I just emailed her a copy of your question (perhaps). Or, perhaps, she will read it on her own. In either event, your meltdown is a matter for record. Leave out the references to sexual acts from your posts, please. This is not a "marketing" thread, for crying out loud.

But James isn't "f@ck off" or go f@ck yourself" referring to a sexual act? Certain of your buddies use those phrases regularly on this message board I don't see you complaining when they do, maybe if you can't explain the ESOP Committee rules, you could explain yours.

Because of your explanation about refferring to a "sexual act" i have modified my post that offended you to the level deserved by your explanation