International Association of Certified Home Inspectors
|
|||||||
| Exterior Inspections Contains discussions about the exterior portion of a home inspection. This includes roofs, gutters, downspouts, decks, patios, windows, etc. |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools |
|
#16
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Peter, did you mean $800-$1000 a ton? Tipping fees around here are $85 a ton and $125 hook-up fee. Asbestos fees are in the $200 a ton range and hauled to Scarborough, Maine which adds a couple hundred on the haul fees. This is done by Pine Tree Waste Disposal. They are all over the Country. Just curious. Marcel LEED Green Associates InachiAwardsPortal: Inachi US Member of the Year Award 2009 |
|
#17
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Either way to do a proper restoration siding job will be in the 10-20K plus range. PS. this includes double bagging of all asbestos and proper disposal. |
|
#18
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Now you tell me Marcel, I removed the asbestos roofing material off my parents house in the early 70's with a crowbar. Guess the siding will have to be done by someone else. |
|
#19
|
||||
|
||||
|
Please Note:
relliott is a non-member guest and is in no way affiliated with InterNACHI or its members.
When working for cable I can only guess how many times I went through the stuff.
Those long files hypnotize me,but I am surprised there was no mention of hosing the stuff down to cut or minimize the dust on removal. |
|
#20
|
|||
|
|||
|
Please Note:
afrost is a non-member guest and is in no way affiliated with InterNACHI or its members.
Quote:
unless it's cracking and friable, there's no issues with the siding and no health reasons to avoid it. when it comes time to remove (say to put on an addition), a licensed abatement contractor can remove it. the costs are not that much greater for a licensed guy to dispose than if you were removing non-asbestos siding. |
|
#21
|
||||
|
||||
|
Please Note:
relliott is a non-member guest and is in no way affiliated with InterNACHI or its members.
I would never do anything to affect the sale and was speaking on a forum.
Give me a little credit for brains andy. The asbestos or (as best as I can guess) siding is a big deal if not expected, and since this may be totaly unexpected till you show up with report in hand I was wondering the best way to convey the news. This is not a minor issue.By the way I bend backwards to never give an opinion on buy or not buy.You do not know of all the factors influencing a sale. |
|
#22
|
||||
|
||||
|
What's wrong with asbestos siding if it's intact, that's like saying an older home with vinyl siding which has faded will cot allot to repair.
|
|
#23
|
|||
|
|||
|
Please Note:
ldapkus is a non-member guest and is in no way affiliated with InterNACHI or its members.
Quote:
|
|
#24
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
http://www.masscertifiedhomeinspections.com/?D=71 |
|
#25
|
||||
|
||||
|
Nice Website David;
Although I agree with you that there is no problem with asbestos siding, sometimes disposal and removal methods done by the common laymen could cause problems. So, to add to this topic I have this to add. Asbestos Environmental Fact Sheet ASB-91996Asbestos Siding and Roofing Removal Guidelines for Homeowners General Based on a number of health studies, the inhalation of asbestos fibers is known to cause several respiratory diseases and research shows that asbestos in any form may constitute a potential health hazard. When untouched, asbestos siding and roofing present a minimal health hazard because the asbestos fibers are bound in a cement type mixture. However, because inhalation is the exposure route of concern, it is important to prevent asbestos fibers from becoming airborne. The health hazard occurs when the siding or roofing is drilled, sawed, sanded, or broken and the fibers are released to the air. The removal of siding and roofing can be legally performed by home owners, general contractors, or licensed abatement contractors as long as each does not violate the National Emissions Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) and work complies with Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) regulations delineated in 29 CFR 1926.1101. NESHAP regulations prohibit any visible emissions of asbestos fibers. As of October 1, 1995 changes in the OSHA regulations require a "competent person" to supervise all asbestos projects and a negative initial exposure assessments must be performed before employees trained in compliance with 29 CFR 1926.1101 can perform asbestos roofing and siding work. It should be noted that if the home owner has tenants then the homeowner is responsible for occupants other than the immediate family and the same regulations that apply to contractors applies to the homeowner. Asbestos projects must be performed in a manner which conforms to the New Hampshire Solid Waste Rules. Before deciding to proceed with what is believed to be an asbestos removal project, be sure that the roofing or siding actually contains asbestos. This can be verified by sending a small sample for laboratory analysis. If the siding/roofing does contain asbestos, be sure to become fully appraised of regulatory requirements before beginning the work. If the material is or becomes friable, (meaning it can be crushed by hand pressure) then it can only be removed by a licensed abatement contractor or the home owner doing the work himself. It is important to note that even under the best circumstances these procedures can be physically demanding and potentially dangerous. Breathing through a respirator places an additional stress on the heart and lungs. Employers are required to have employees medically tested and approved by a doctor to use a negative pressure respirator. For individual homeowners it would be prudent to seek a medical opinion prior to wearing such equipment. Protective clothing can become hot and restrict motion, requiring added care to be taken when working on ladders and in high places. Eye protection may result in reduced visibility. Caution must be taken around live wiring and electrical power when using the misting (water application) techniques to prevent visible emissions of asbestos fibers. The homeowner (or contractor removing the material) is responsible for determining the condition of the asbestos material. If the asbestos siding or roofing is "non-friable" (meaning that it cannot be crushed to powder by hand pressure), the law considers it to be a solid waste which requires special handling and can be disposed of in landfill approved for that purpose with consent of the owner/operator. The asbestos wastes may not be placed in demolition landfills or "brush and stump" areas in the State of N.H. There are strict regulations governing how asbestos is to be packaged, labeled, and transported to landfills permitted to accept asbestos (see Fact Sheet ASB-13). Arrangements for adhering to these provisions should be made prior to starting the job of removal. In making a decision regarding the removal of asbestos roofing or siding, the homeowner should utilize the following tests to determine the associated health risks. If any part of the siding or roofing material can be crushed into powder by hand pressure, it is to be considered potentially dangerous. If no powder can be generated by hand pressure, the material is probably relatively safe. The removal procedure to be utilized is governed by the type and condition of the asbestos material. If there is any question as to the type of roofing material confirmation should be made by laboratory analysis. The following strategy can be used as a guideline in developing a plan of action for removal and disposal of asbestos siding and roofing:
LEED Green Associates InachiAwardsPortal: Inachi US Member of the Year Award 2009 |
|
#26
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Very often, homeowners do not even get involved in removing asbestos siding. I see a lot of asbestos siding covered over with other materials on an everyday basis. My clients often ask me what they should do with asbestos siding if they were to change it. I always tell them to have the siding contractors simply go over the existing siding and not even consider removing it as the costs would be exorbitant. The only probelem I see with covering the asbestos siding is the fact that installers of the new siding will be breathing in the floating asbestos dust while securing the new siding. And you know they're not fully protected when doing the installation. |
|
#27
|
||||
|
||||
|
If the new siding is vinyl they should put 3/8 foam underlayment on before the siding, this levels the wall out to some extent and provided a vapor barrier.
Once the foam in up you would have very little contact with the old siding. |
|
#28
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
|
|
#29
|
|||
|
|||
|
Please Note:
rwand1 is a non-member guest and is in no way affiliated with InterNACHI or its members.
Asbestos exposure and health are related to long term exposure, not usually related to small infrequent low levels. While I am not saying its not dangerous, everyone assumes that a slight exposure will cause health problems, but again that depends on type of asbesos in my opinion.
|
|
#30
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Asbestos | jmckenna1 | Miscellaneous Discussion for Inspectors | 0 | 1/27/07 12:11 AM |
| Asbestos | jmckenna1 | Miscellaneous Discussion for Inspectors | 0 | 1/27/07 12:09 AM |
| Asbestos Still Legal, Dates of Bans | Stephen Masek | Ancillary Inspection Services & Additional Topics | 8 | 1/17/07 9:26 PM |
| Is this a competent asbestos removal job? Is our basement now a biohazard? | David Paterson | Ancillary Inspection Services & Additional Topics | 5 | 1/16/07 8:16 PM |
| Mould v. Asbestos | Caoimhín P. Connell | Ancillary Inspection Services & Additional Topics | 30 | 1/15/07 11:35 PM |