InterNACHI


Go Back   InterNACHI Inspection Forum > Specific Inspection Topics > Exterior Inspections

Notices

Exterior Inspections Contains discussions about the exterior portion of a home inspection. This includes roofs, gutters, downspouts, decks, patios, windows, etc.

 
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
  #1  
Old 12/17/07, 10:18 PM
Kenton H. Shepard, CMI's Avatar
Kenton H. Shepard, CMI Kenton H. Shepard, CMI is offline
InterNACHI Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Boulder, CO
Posts: 3,417
Send a message via ICQ to kshepard
Default Comp shingles: step flashing VS continuous

I often see continuous flashing installed at roof to wall junctions instead of step flashing. It's incorrect, but I've never found leaks I could blame on this type of installation. Has anyone?




Kenton Shepard, InterNACHI member # 04082383
Certified Master Inspector (CMI)
InterNACHI Director of International Development
Director of Green Building

EXPERT WITNESS SERVICE
Conventional and Log homes

(303) 717-8940
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 12/17/07, 10:42 PM
Barry Adair's Avatar
Barry Adair Barry Adair is offline
InterNACHI Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: TEXAS
Posts: 3,932
Default Re: Comp shingles: step flashing VS continuous

yes
i'll see if i can locate in/out photo



ADAIR INSPECTION
972-487-5634

Commercial-Residential-Construction-EIFS-Infrared Thermography
TREC # 4563
EDI: EIFS-MA TX # 39

2008 US Member of the Year

life is the random lottery of events followed by numerous narrow escapes accept the good
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 12/18/07, 6:33 PM
Ed Fako's Avatar
Ed Fako Ed Fako is offline
Active Poster
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: NW Chicago Suburbs
Posts: 199
Please Note: Ed Fako is a non-member guest and is in no way affiliated with InterNACHI or its members.
Default Re: Comp shingles: step flashing VS continuous

The requirement for multiple step flashing baby tins sometimes baffles me too, because when I have installed concrete and clay tile roofs intersecting a side wall, the flashings are fabricated to ideally run the full length of the length of the wall.

Same principal, but a different method.

Ed
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 12/18/07, 7:33 PM
John Cahill John Cahill is offline
InterNACHI Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Plano, TX
Posts: 826
Default Re: Comp shingles: step flashing VS continuous

Can you point me to the reference that requires step flashing?
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 12/18/07, 8:36 PM
Marcel R. Cyr's Avatar
Marcel R. Cyr Marcel R. Cyr is offline
InterNACHI Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Winslow, ME
Posts: 19,788
Default Re: Comp shingles: step flashing VS continuous

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ed Fako
The requirement for multiple step flashing baby tins sometimes baffles me too, because when I have installed concrete and clay tile roofs intersecting a side wall, the flashings are fabricated to ideally run the full length of the length of the wall.

Same principal, but a different method.

Ed

Ed are you talking about what they call Z metal counterflashing and a Pan flashing used with concrete and clay tile roofs?

They are continuous up and down the roof and the pan flashing is made so water will be troughed away from it's 6" edge and down the bottom of the eave, it is extended a couple of inches , cut and tucked under the pan to divert water away from the wall. I guess that would be called Carl's Diverter. ha. ha.

Marcel
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 12/18/07, 8:46 PM
Marcel R. Cyr's Avatar
Marcel R. Cyr Marcel R. Cyr is offline
InterNACHI Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Winslow, ME
Posts: 19,788
Default Re: Comp shingles: step flashing VS continuous

Quote:
Originally Posted by kshepard
I often see continuous flashing installed at roof to wall junctions instead of step flashing. It's incorrect, but I've never found leaks I could blame on this type of installation. Has anyone?
Kenton, how are you?

The flashing your looking for is as Ed is describing if it is not shingles. You will find it deep in here.
http://www.abouthomes.info/files/ICBO.pdf

There might be another possibility, that if it is a shingle roof, that the continuous flashing had that bubble or hem in it to prevent the water from going under the shingles similar to clay tile.

Marcel
</IMG>
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 12/18/07, 9:00 PM
Marcel R. Cyr's Avatar
Marcel R. Cyr Marcel R. Cyr is offline
InterNACHI Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Winslow, ME
Posts: 19,788
Default Re: Comp shingles: step flashing VS continuous

Quote:
Originally Posted by jcahill
Can you point me to the reference that requires step flashing?
Hi. John;

That is reference under the IRC R905.2.8.4 sidewall flashing

Flashing against a vertical sidewall shall be by the step-flashing method.

It is also referenced in R703.7.5, R703.8, R903.2.

Hope this helps.

Marcel
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 12/18/07, 11:50 PM
Ed Fako's Avatar
Ed Fako Ed Fako is offline
Active Poster
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: NW Chicago Suburbs
Posts: 199
Please Note: Ed Fako is a non-member guest and is in no way affiliated with InterNACHI or its members.
Default Re: Comp shingles: step flashing VS continuous

Marcel,

I was referring to the individual baby tin flashings where one individual 2 1/2" X 2 1/2" X 7" goes under each course of shingles where it abutts a side wall.

On tile roofs, this underneath flashing is usually a continuous piece, with a hem bent to channel the downward water flowage.

Ed
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 12/19/07, 5:47 AM
Marcel R. Cyr's Avatar
Marcel R. Cyr Marcel R. Cyr is offline
InterNACHI Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Winslow, ME
Posts: 19,788
Default Re: Comp shingles: step flashing VS continuous

Hi. Ed;

Not familiar with the term baby thins, would you have a picture of it or are you talking about the regular step flashing?

Marcel
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 12/19/07, 8:21 AM
Carl A. Brown's Avatar
Carl A. Brown Carl A. Brown is offline
InterNACHI Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Kansas City, ks
Posts: 10,763
Default Re: Comp shingles: step flashing VS continuous

Baby thins only go up the wall half as far as they need to!



"I create controversy whether they like it or not"



Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 12/19/07, 8:33 AM
Marcel R. Cyr's Avatar
Marcel R. Cyr Marcel R. Cyr is offline
InterNACHI Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Winslow, ME
Posts: 19,788
Default Re: Comp shingles: step flashing VS continuous

Quote:
Originally Posted by cbrown1
Baby thins only go up the wall half as far as they need to!
Carl, is that you? It says you are not a Member.

If that is what they call baby thins, let us leave for the baby and use the right size step flashing. ha. ha.

Marcel
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 12/19/07, 8:36 AM
Dale Duffy's Avatar
Dale Duffy Dale Duffy is offline
InterNACHI Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Scottsdale, AZ
Posts: 8,261
Default Re: Comp shingles: step flashing VS continuous

I like continuous side wall flashing myself...if the installer is sharp enough to keep the material being flashed on the roof.......



Same principle with shingles, a 8" or 10" L-Flashing installed against the framing and roof decking.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 12/19/07, 8:38 AM
Dale Duffy's Avatar
Dale Duffy Dale Duffy is offline
InterNACHI Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Scottsdale, AZ
Posts: 8,261
Default Re: Comp shingles: step flashing VS continuous

Quote:
Originally Posted by kshepard
I often see continuous flashing installed at roof to wall junctions instead of step flashing. It's incorrect, but I've never found leaks I could blame on this type of installation. Has anyone?
Kenton,

I would blame the installer, not the flashing......
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 12/19/07, 8:41 AM
Carl A. Brown's Avatar
Carl A. Brown Carl A. Brown is offline
InterNACHI Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Kansas City, ks
Posts: 10,763
Default Re: Comp shingles: step flashing VS continuous

Quote:
Originally Posted by mcyr
Carl, is that you? It says you are not a Member.

If that is what they call baby thins, let us leave for the baby and use the right size step flashing. ha. ha.

Marcel
yes! I am kinda behind now.

And there is a time and place for all flashings.

The problem I have with the (baby thins) Stucco is suppose to be atleast 2 inches off the roof they do no allow for that application.

And the roofers use them everywhere!



"I create controversy whether they like it or not"



Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 12/19/07, 8:42 AM
Carl A. Brown's Avatar
Carl A. Brown Carl A. Brown is offline
InterNACHI Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Kansas City, ks
Posts: 10,763
Default Re: Comp shingles: step flashing VS continuous

Ditto Dale!!



"I create controversy whether they like it or not"



Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Comp shingles over wood shingles Matthew Hopkins Exterior Inspections 28 10/16/07 11:19 AM
Chimney flashing photo's needed: brick and stone done correctly kshepard Exterior Inspections 6 10/13/07 8:10 AM
Question about chimney flashing waksell Exterior Inspections 16 6/26/07 12:25 AM
exposed step flashing Rafael Exterior Inspections 9 5/8/06 12:25 AM
Step flashing at vertical wall? jlybolt Exterior Inspections 31 2/12/06 11:40 AM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:01 PM.


Popular Sections

:

All Sections

Inspection News

InterNACHI Membership

Inspection Standards

Inspection Education

InterNACHI Inspectors

Inspection Links

 

 

 

NACHI.ORG Statistics

 

 

no new posts