International Association of Certified Home Inspectors
|
|||||||
| Interior Inspections Contains discussions about the interior portion of a home inspection. This includes stairs, walls, floors, ceilings, smoke detectors, etc. |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Does a fire wall in the attic of a duplex have to be taped completely? Is one layer of 5/8 drywall acceptible between duplex walls in the attic?
|
| Need a home inspection in Georgia? Check out InterNACHI's listing of Georgia certified home inspectors. Or, find a home inspector anywhere in the world with our inspection search engine. |
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Yes. All openings (including drywall joints) must be sealed with a rated material. As to the question of one layer of drywall; I think it depends when the home/condo was built and to what standard or code. I would think more than one layer of drywall would be required (and would provide better protection).
|
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Typically (in my area)... as long as the drywall is fire rated, and individual sheets butt up together, and these joints fall solidly onto framing... it is okey-dokey without being taped/mudded. Fed may be different from State, which may be different from County, which may be different from City. Get's real confusing around here at times! BTW... isn't Canada smoke/vapor rated as opposed to fire rated? Or is it both? That may be another difference between our countries codes. Jeffrey R. Jonas Critical Eye Property Inspections JRJ Consultants Owatonna, Minnesota Chapter President InterNachi Awards Portal: http://co.nachi.org/inachiawards/
|
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
Please Note:
Brian A. MacNeish is a non-member guest and is in no way affiliated with InterNACHI or its members.
Quote:
Depending on the arrangement with other occupancies (mercatile, etc)/# of stories, various requirements for fire separations between residential units/others apply with fire resistant ratings from 45 min to 2 hours. |
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
Not applicable here, but good to know the difference between what's required for a townhouse vs. a duplex.
"Definition: TOWNHOUSE. A single-family dwelling unit constructed in a group of three or more attached units in which each unit extends from foundation to roof and with a yard or public way on at least two sides. 2009 IRC R302.2 Townhouses. Each townhouse shall be considered a separate building and shall be separated by fire-resistance- rated wall assemblies meeting the requirements of Section R302.1 for exterior walls. Exception: A common 1-hour fire-resistance-rated wallCommentary: The application of this section has its basis in the exterior wall requirements found in Section R302.1 that deal with the building’s location on the lot. The definition of a townhouse in Section R202 should be reviewed, as well as the requirement for structural independence in Section R302.2.4. In general, because the “exterior wall” of the townhouse is essentially being constructed with no fire separation distance where one townhouse adjoins another, the code requires, by Section R302.1, that the wall have not less than a 1-hour fire-resistance rating. The adjacent townhouse would have the same requirement. Therefore, the general requirement at this location (based on Sections R302.1 and R302.3) would be that each townhouse has its own “exterior wall.” This would result in the construction of two separate 1-hour walls located side by side where one townhouse adjoins another. Because of the difficulties involved in construction and the potential for unnecessary duplication, the exception offers an alternative to the two separate 1-hour walls by permitting the construction of a shared or “common” 2-hour-rated wall between the townhouses. See Commentary Figure R302.2 for an illustration of the two separate 1-hour walls and the common 2-hour wall. This exception has its basis in the actions of many building officials who permit this type of common wall as an alternative method of construction using provisions similar to those found in Section R104.11. Because the common wall has the potential to create an interconnection between the adjacent dwelling units and reduce the clear separation that would exist if two separate walls were constructed, the code places limits on services being located within the wall. This exception does not permit the inclusion of any type of plumbing, mechanical equipment, ducts or vents within the cavity of the common wall. This prohibition is applicable even if the penetrations or openings are protected by the penetration provisions of Section R302.4 or if a damper is installed in the duct or vent. The prohibition on plumbing includes all types of plumbing materials and systems, as well as water supply and drainage piping of either combustible or noncombustible materials. However, the exception permits the cavity of the wall to be used for electrical installations if they comply with the electrical provisions of the code and the penetrations are properly protected."
“The things that will destroy America are peace at any price, prosperity at any cost, safety first instead of duty first, the love of soft living, and the get-rich-quick theory of life.” Theodore Roosevelt Joe Funderburk, CMI Alpha & Omega Home Inspections, LLC Inspecting Upstate SC & Charlotte Metro, NC NACHI ID: NACHI05120170 www.aohomeinspection.com Last edited by jfunderburk; 6/29/11 at 6:28 PM.. |
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
"2009 IRC R302.3 Two-family dwellings. Dwelling units in two-family
dwellings shall be separated from each other by wall and/or floor assemblies having not less than a 1-hour fire-resistance rating when tested in accordance with ASTME 119 or UL 263. Fire-resistance-rated floor-ceiling and wall assemblies shall extend to and be tight against the exterior wall, and wall assemblies shall extend from the foundation to the underside of the roof sheathing. Exceptions:Commentary: Most of the nation’s fires occur in residential buildings, particularly one- and two-family dwellings. These fires account for more than 80 percent of all deaths from fire in residential uses (including hotels, apartments, dormitories, etc.) and about two-thirds of all fire fatalities in any type of building. One- and two-family dwellings also account for more than 80 percent of residential property losses and more than one-half of all property losses from fire. Despite this poor fire record, there is wide-spread resistance to mandating much in the way of fire protection systems or methods because of our society’s belief that people’s homes are their castles. This viewpoint has limited the types of protection that are imposed on these private homes to the installation of smoke alarms and the more recent requirement of dwelling unit separation. Section R302.3 provides a separation for protection of the occupants of one dwelling unit from the actions of their neighbor. The requirements of this section pertain to any structure regulated by the code other than a single-family dwelling unit. To accomplish this protection, the code addresses separation between the units, structural support and any openings or penetrations of the separation. Depending on the layout of the various dwelling units, Section R302.3 requires that the walls and/or floor assemblies that divide one dwelling unit from the adjacent unit is of at least 1-hour fire-resistant construction. See Commentary Figure R302.3 for examples of the separation. The separation rating is to be determined by either ASTM E 119 or UL 263, which is the normal test used for determining fire resistance. Many tested assemblies are available for use in these locations. The provisions of the section also address the continuity of the separation, so that one dwelling unit is completely divided from the other. The horizontal aspect of the separation, which requires that the assemblies extend to and be tight against the exterior wall, is not difficult to comply with. It is most likely the vertical aspect (continuing a wall assembly to the underside of the roof sheathing) that will require some detailed planning, careful construction and careful inspection for the units to be separated. Exception 1 grants a reduction in the required separation for those cases in which the building is equipped with an automatic sprinkler system. In these cases, a rating of 1/2 hour is permitted versus a 1-hour fire-resistance rating. The sprinkler system must be “installed in accordance with NFPA 13,” and is to be installed “throughout” the building. The type of sprinkler system used must meet NFPA 13 and may not be installed to either the NFPA 13D or 13R, even though those two standards do address certain types of residential uses. The word “throughout” requires that the sprinkler system be installed in all portions of both dwelling units and any common spaces. The provisions of NFPA 13 that permit omitting sprinklers in certain areas, such as small concealed spaces, are applicable. Therefore, the provision requires a complying sprinkler system “throughout” the building (that is, in all areas of the building that must be protected according to the standard), and it does not accept any partial system, such as one installed in only one dwelling unit or only in the basement level of both units. Exception 2 addresses separation in the area of the attic of two-family dwellings or duplexes. As long as the attic draft stop is present and meets the requirements in Section R302.12.1, there is a provision for the 1-hour fire separation to stop at a ceiling constructed of 5/8-inch (15.9 mm) Type X gypsum board. Many times the type of truss or attic rafter and rafter tie/collar tie configuration will prohibit continuing construction of the 1-hour separation wall all the way up to the roof sheathing. ![]() R302.12.1 Materials. Draftstopping materials shall not be less than 1/2-inch (12.7 mm) gypsum board, 3/8-inch (9.5 mm)wood structural panels or other approved materials adequately supported. Draftstopping shall be installed parallel to the floor framing members unless otherwise approved by the building official. The integrity of the draftstops shall be maintained." I could be wrong, but I read the above to say that if the CEILING of each unit is 5/8" sheetrock, then a full draft stop between the units of 1/2" sheetrock is all that is required in the attic of a duplex (townhouse is different). My interpretation is that each unit should have 1/2" sheetrock above the ceiling to the roof sheathing, sealed at the joints. Not sure how you can confirm all that during a home inspection. I simply look for sheetrock sealed at the joints and don't try to confirm the number of layers or thickness. P.S. The definition of a 'firewall' is: "A fire-resistance-rated wall having protected openings, which restricts the spread of fire and extends continuously from the foundation to or through the roof, with sufficient structural stability under fire conditions to allow collapse of construction on either side without collapse of the wall." “The things that will destroy America are peace at any price, prosperity at any cost, safety first instead of duty first, the love of soft living, and the get-rich-quick theory of life.” Theodore Roosevelt Joe Funderburk, CMI Alpha & Omega Home Inspections, LLC Inspecting Upstate SC & Charlotte Metro, NC NACHI ID: NACHI05120170 www.aohomeinspection.com Last edited by jfunderburk; 6/30/11 at 8:55 AM.. |
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
Kerri,
To answer your first question. Yes. Drywall joints shall be taped or sealed. The second question. Always best to check with the AHJ. In my area a duplex is a 2 family dwelling. They are to be separated by firewall, separate entrances etc. It is also classified as R-3 construction, which means an attic firewall has a fire-resistance rating of 2 hours, must have not less than one layer of 5/8" Type X gypsum or 2 layers of 1/2" gypsum wallboard on both sides of dwelling spaces. In my area a firewall is designed to resist the passage of fire for a period of time not less than the required fire resistant rating of the wall, floor or roof in or between which it is installed. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Firewall question | gwilcox | Interior Inspections | 2 | 7/7/10 6:27 PM |
| firewall question | wmcdougald | General Inspection Discussion | 11 | 3/20/10 1:54 PM |
| Sump Pit/Pump Question | Joey D'Adamo | Plumbing Inspections | 4 | 11/26/08 1:04 PM |
| What's this video worth? | jtedesco1 | Inspection Education & Training | 5 | 4/18/08 9:24 AM |
| Another Firewall Question? | dsmith1 | Interior Inspections | 9 | 2/10/07 6:35 PM |