InterNACHI


Go Back   InterNACHI Inspection Forum > Specific Inspection Topics > Electrical Inspections

Notices

Electrical Inspections Contains discussions about electrical systems. This includes receptacles, panels, wiring, etc.

 
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
  #1  
Old 10/24/07, 6:49 PM
Scott Schultz Scott Schultz is offline
Active Poster
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Surprise, AZ
Posts: 216
Please Note: Scott Schultz is a non-member guest and is in no way affiliated with InterNACHI or its members.
Default consensus

When you come across solid aluminum branch wiring that looks fine, do you still recommend an electrician to evaluate solely on the basis that there is aluminum wiring or do you only recommend if the wires don't look that great? I always recommend regardless but just want to get what the masses think. thanks.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 10/24/07, 6:54 PM
David P. Valley's Avatar
David P. Valley David P. Valley is offline
InterNACHI Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: METHUEN, MA
Posts: 8,681
Default Re: consensus

Quote:
Originally Posted by Scott Schultz
When you come across solid aluminum branch wiring that looks fine, do you still recommend an electrician to evaluate solely on the basis that there is aluminum wiring or do you only recommend if the wires don't look that great? I always recommend regardless but just want to get what the masses think. thanks.
Absolutely. All solid aluminum wiring must be corrected.

I always give them my link to Aluminum wiring.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 10/24/07, 6:54 PM
Bob Elliott's Avatar
Bob Elliott Bob Elliott is offline
InterNACHI Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Chicago
Posts: 21,908
Default Re: consensus

Yes as it requires special hardware which can be bastardized over time by DIY types.
It needs to be noted for that reason if nothing else.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 10/24/07, 6:56 PM
Harry E. McClard's Avatar
Harry E. McClard Harry E. McClard is offline
InterNACHI Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Raymond, NH
Posts: 103
Default Re: consensus

Just as a matter of policy, I always mention aluminum wiring but only go into detail if the connections look oxidized or something ugly like that. Maybe it's just me, but cient deserves to know it's Al if it is; with a little mention of what the concerns are.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 10/24/07, 8:14 PM
Jeffrey R. Pope's Avatar
Jeffrey R. Pope Jeffrey R. Pope is offline
InterNACHI Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Santa Clarita, CA
Posts: 8,047
Default Re: consensus

Most SOP's require (at minimum) that we identify the wire type. With that, if you note that the wiring at the general branch circuits consist of solid AL, you should also make the client aware of the problems associated with this type of conductor (IMHO).

While I certainly don't subscribe to the "rewire your house" recommendation, I will almost always advise my clients to have the system inspected by a qualified electrician, who is familiar with AL wiring and approved repair methods.

There are "permanent" repair methods that are cost effective and I don't believe that AL wiring needs to be replaced.



IF YOUR INSPECTOR IS NOT USING THERMAL IMAGING, YOU'RE NOT GETTING THE WHOLE PICTURE ®
Jeff Pope
JPI Home Inspection Service
Santa Clarita CA
(661) 212-0738
Santa Clarita Home Inspection
http://www.MyInspector.net


Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 10/24/07, 11:21 PM
Larry D. Kage Larry D. Kage is offline
InterNACHI Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Lake Ann (Traverse City), MI
Posts: 8,847
Default Re: consensus

Quote:
Originally Posted by Scott Schultz
When you come across solid aluminum branch wiring that looks fine, do you still recommend an electrician to evaluate solely on the basis that there is aluminum wiring or do you only recommend if the wires don't look that great? I always recommend regardless but just want to get what the masses think. thanks.
Typically, many connections, that are not readily visible, are problematic.



InterNachi Awards Portal: http://co.nachi.org/inachiawards/

____________________________________________
"An Education, not just an Inspection"

Larry Kage, CMI
Lake Ann (Traverse City), Michigan 49650
231 929 3525


Professional Inspector serving the Traverse City, Michigan area and beyond.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 10/25/07, 12:16 PM
Jeffrey R. Pope's Avatar
Jeffrey R. Pope Jeffrey R. Pope is offline
InterNACHI Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Santa Clarita, CA
Posts: 8,047
Default Re: consensus

I like your pages David and you know I respect your opinion, but I disagree with this. . .

Quote:
Replace the aluminum wire with copper wire. The best and most permanent solution. Strongly recommended.
Replacing the AL wiring is not the "best" solution, it is an "extreme" solution that is (IMHO) completely unwarranted. It makes as much sense to me as re-piping your house because the faucets are leaking.

The AL wiring, the conductor itself, is not an issue. It's the connection points that have problems and these problems can be corrected with relative ease, and minimal expense.



IF YOUR INSPECTOR IS NOT USING THERMAL IMAGING, YOU'RE NOT GETTING THE WHOLE PICTURE ®
Jeff Pope
JPI Home Inspection Service
Santa Clarita CA
(661) 212-0738
Santa Clarita Home Inspection
http://www.MyInspector.net


Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 10/26/07, 6:52 AM
David P. Valley's Avatar
David P. Valley David P. Valley is offline
InterNACHI Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: METHUEN, MA
Posts: 8,681
Default Re: consensus

Quote:
Originally Posted by jpope
I like your pages David and you know I respect your opinion, but I disagree with this. . .
Great......
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 10/26/07, 11:56 AM
Greg Fretwell Greg Fretwell is offline
Active Poster
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Estero Florida
Posts: 1,798
Please Note: Greg Fretwell is a non-member guest and is in no way affiliated with InterNACHI or its members.
Default Re: consensus

It must be pointed out that CPSC is a political organization, not a nationally recognized testing lab.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 10/26/07, 12:16 PM
Michael Larson's Avatar
Michael Larson Michael Larson is offline
InterNACHI Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Hudson, WI including the Twin Cities of MN
Posts: 32,049
Default Re: consensus

Quote:
Originally Posted by Greg Fretwell
It must be pointed out that CPSC is a political organization, not a nationally recognized testing lab.
Huh?

CPSC Overview
The U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission is charged with protecting the public from unreasonable risks of serious injury or death from more than 15,000 types of consumer products under the agency's jurisdiction. Deaths, injuries and property damage from consumer product incidents cost the nation more than $700 billion annually. The CPSC is committed to protecting consumers and families from products that pose a fire, electrical, chemical, or mechanical hazard or can injure children. The CPSC's work to ensure the safety of consumer products - such as toys, cribs, power tools, cigarette lighters, and household chemicals - contributed significantly to the 30 percent decline in the rate of deaths and injuries associated with consumer products over the past 30 years.

Q.Who heads CPSC?
A. The agency is headed by three commissioners nominated by the President and confirmed by the Senate for staggered seven-year terms. The President designates one of the commissioners as Chairman. The current Chairman (Acting) is Nancy Nord. For more information on the current commissioners, see their biographical information.

Q.How is the agency organized?
A. The three commissioners set policy for CPSC. The Chairman is the chief administrator. Five offices report directly to the Chairman: Congressional Relations, Equal Employment and Minority Enterprise, General Counsel, Inspector General, and Executive Director.

The Executive Director directs and oversees Commission policy and administration, which are implemented by the offices that report to that office: Compliance and Field Operations, Hazard Identification and Reduction, Financial Management, Planning, and Evaluation, Human Resources, Information and Public Affairs, Information Management and Technology, International Programs and Intergovermental Affairs. See the CPSC organizational chart.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 10/26/07, 2:13 PM
Greg Fretwell Greg Fretwell is offline
Active Poster
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Estero Florida
Posts: 1,798
Please Note: Greg Fretwell is a non-member guest and is in no way affiliated with InterNACHI or its members.
Default Re: consensus

Quote:
A. The agency is headed by three commissioners nominated by the President and confirmed by the Senate


These are political patronage jobs, not a Nationally Recognized Testing Lab. The CPSC is not referenced in the NEC anywhere and there are only a couple of glancing references in handbook comentary.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 10/26/07, 2:33 PM
Michael Larson's Avatar
Michael Larson Michael Larson is offline
InterNACHI Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Hudson, WI including the Twin Cities of MN
Posts: 32,049
Default Re: consensus

Greg,

I realize that.
Just what "political" decisions has it rendered that bother you?

If they are a useful agency, so be it.

If they are not they should be eliminated.

Frankly we could probably do without them but the insurance companies would have to step up and perform a similar function. Agreed?

Last edited by mlarson; 10/26/07 at 9:50 PM..
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 10/26/07, 9:46 PM
Greg Fretwell Greg Fretwell is offline
Active Poster
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Estero Florida
Posts: 1,798
Please Note: Greg Fretwell is a non-member guest and is in no way affiliated with InterNACHI or its members.
Default Re: consensus

That is why we have NRTLs like U/L, ETL and TUV.
U/L was originally founded to provide standards for the insurance industry.

The CPSC is not even "recognized" by the federal government (OSHA)

BTW to answer your question, I am always suspicious of anyone in the government who only has one solution that can only be sourced by one company.
It sort of makes me want to see who Tyco was contributing money to in the 92 and 94 elections.

Last edited by Greg Fretwell; 10/26/07 at 9:55 PM..
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 10/26/07, 9:52 PM
Michael Larson's Avatar
Michael Larson Michael Larson is offline
InterNACHI Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Hudson, WI including the Twin Cities of MN
Posts: 32,049
Default Re: consensus

Greg I used work for one of the NRTLs you mentioned

I'm still not sure what your problem with the CPSC is.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Need to know???? cbottger Canadian Inspectors 1279 4/30/10 5:31 PM
NACHI reveals its secret method for making decisions when consensus can't be reached. gromicko Miscellaneous Discussion for Inspectors 16 10/3/06 8:16 PM
Hudson Valley Courses bmerrell Inspection Education & Training 9 1/27/06 7:55 PM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 2:26 AM.


Popular Sections

:

All Sections

Inspection News

InterNACHI Membership

Inspection Standards

Inspection Education

InterNACHI Inspectors

Inspection Links

 

 

 

NACHI.ORG Statistics

 

 

no new posts