InterNACHI


Go Back   InterNACHI Inspection Forum > Specific Inspection Topics > Electrical Inspections

Notices

Electrical Inspections Contains discussions about electrical systems. This includes receptacles, panels, wiring, etc.

 
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
  #1  
Old 10/30/08, 9:32 PM
Ron Chorey II's Avatar
Ron Chorey II Ron Chorey II is offline
InterNACHI Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Las Cruces, NM eating chili!!
Posts: 638
Default Is this correct

Inspected a home today and it looks like the grounds and neutral are tied together. Is this correct? This was a Cutler Hammer panel circa 1978 I think
Attached Thumbnails
correct-picture-054.jpg   correct-picture-055.jpg  
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 10/30/08, 10:06 PM
gbeaumont's Avatar
gbeaumont gbeaumont is offline
InterNACHI Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Clearwater, FL
Posts: 6,261
Send a message via AIM to gbeaumont Send a message via MSN to gbeaumont Send a message via Yahoo to gbeaumont
Default Re: Is this correct

Quote:
Originally Posted by rchorey View Post
Inspected a home today and it looks like the grounds and neutral are tied together. Is this correct? This was a Cutler Hammer panel circa 1978 I think

Ronald, as this appears to be the panel containg the main disconnect having the Neutrals and grounds on the same bus is OK, however I would question the multiple tapping of the Neutrals, they really should be seperately terminated on the bus.

Regards

Gerry



"To realize our true destiny, we must be guided not by a myth from our past, but by a vision of our future."
(Mark B Adams)

Commercial property Inspection Tampa, Orlando, Sarasota, Jacksonville, Ft Launderdale, Miami, Florida.
NACHI cell 484-429-5466
NACHI02121106

Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 10/30/08, 10:08 PM
GARY R. EVANS GARY R. EVANS is offline
InterNACHI Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Coconut Creek, FL
Posts: 55
Default Re: Is this correct

It is fine as long as the house main breaker is in the panel. The neutral is required to be bonded to the enclosure at the main disconnect location. If the Main was outside by the meter then the the grounds and neutrals should be isolated from each other in the interior panel.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 10/30/08, 11:09 PM
tdietrich1's Avatar
tdietrich1 tdietrich1 is offline
InterNACHI Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Northampton County - Pa
Posts: 1,954
Send a message via Yahoo to tdietrich1
Default Re: Is this correct

Quote:
Originally Posted by gbeaumont View Post
however I would question the multiple tapping of the Neutrals
The effort made braiding the wires to fit under one screw compared to using the empty screws ... tips me off to look closer at the electrical work. Common sense seems uncommon here.

Tom
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 10/30/08, 11:30 PM
James F. McKee's Avatar
James F. McKee James F. McKee is offline
InterNACHI Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Amherst, Oh
Posts: 5,567
Default Re: Is this correct

Quote:
Originally Posted by gevans2 View Post
It is fine as long as the house main breaker is in the panel. The neutral is required to be bonded to the enclosure at the main disconnect location. If the Main was outside by the meter then the the grounds and neutrals should be isolated from each other in the interior panel.
welcome aboard Gary....come back often....jim



Classic Home inspections

Jim Mckee
Amherst, Ohio

www.amhersthomeinspector.com
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 10/30/08, 11:32 PM
James F. McKee's Avatar
James F. McKee James F. McKee is offline
InterNACHI Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Amherst, Oh
Posts: 5,567
Default Re: Is this correct

Quote:
Originally Posted by gbeaumont View Post
Ronald, as this appears to be the panel containg the main disconnect having the Neutrals and grounds on the same bus is OK, however I would question the multiple tapping of the Neutrals, they really should be seperately terminated on the bus.

Regards

Gerry
agreed, but was this not a common practice Gerry???



Classic Home inspections

Jim Mckee
Amherst, Ohio

www.amhersthomeinspector.com
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 10/31/08, 2:44 AM
pdickerson pdickerson is offline
InterNACHI Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Clinton, WA
Posts: 341
Default Re: Is this correct

I think it was common in some areas of the country, but not in my area. I don't see double tapped neutrals or combined neutral-grounds all that often.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 10/31/08, 6:49 AM
David P. Valley's Avatar
David P. Valley David P. Valley is offline
InterNACHI Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: METHUEN, MA
Posts: 8,681
Default Re: Is this correct

Quote:
Originally Posted by jmckee View Post
agreed, but was this not a common practice Gerry???

Double lugged neutrals are a common practice here and I write every one of them up.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 10/31/08, 7:22 AM
Ron Chorey II's Avatar
Ron Chorey II Ron Chorey II is offline
InterNACHI Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Las Cruces, NM eating chili!!
Posts: 638
Default Re: Is this correct

Thank you gentlemen for your expertise
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 10/31/08, 8:39 AM
gbeaumont's Avatar
gbeaumont gbeaumont is offline
InterNACHI Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Clearwater, FL
Posts: 6,261
Send a message via AIM to gbeaumont Send a message via MSN to gbeaumont Send a message via Yahoo to gbeaumont
Default Re: Is this correct

Quote:
Originally Posted by jmckee View Post
agreed, but was this not a common practice Gerry???
Hi Jim, so was pushing 5 year olds up chimneys

but we think we know better these days

Seriously though, The code on double tapping neutrals came in in the early 1980's if memory serves, and the picture that was posted appears to feature quad & quin taps

Regards

Gerry



"To realize our true destiny, we must be guided not by a myth from our past, but by a vision of our future."
(Mark B Adams)

Commercial property Inspection Tampa, Orlando, Sarasota, Jacksonville, Ft Launderdale, Miami, Florida.
NACHI cell 484-429-5466
NACHI02121106

Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 10/31/08, 9:11 AM
Michael Larson's Avatar
Michael Larson Michael Larson is offline
InterNACHI Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Hudson, WI including the Twin Cities of MN
Posts: 32,090
Default Re: Is this correct

It never has been permitted technically by UL67 and under NEC 110.3(B).

It was clarified in NEC 408.21

Even Mike Holt was confused by this issue.

Video link

Holt's comment:

Switchboards and Panelboards
408.21 Grounded Conductor Terminations
Intent: This new section should ensure that grounded (neutral) conductors terminate within the panelboard to an individual terminal. This has been a UL requirement (UL Std. 67 – Panelboard Standard) for some time, and the addition to the NEC is intended to bring this information to the installers. Technically, this is covered by 110.3(B), which requires all equipment to be installed in accordance with the manufacturer's installation instructions and markings, but nobody knew it existed. UL Std. 67 (Panelboard Standard) permits up to three 10 AWG equipment grounding conductors to terminate on a single terminal, if the terminal is marked for this purpose. Figure 408-3

The intent of this requirement is to ensure that the grounded (neutral) conductor of a multiwire branch circuit is not momentarily disconnected, which could result in the destruction of electrical equipment and fires from overvoltage.



You can argue with intelligent people but to argue with a mush head is like trying to grab fog-Thomas Sowell

Never underestimate the difficulty of changing false beliefs by facts. - Henry Rosovsky-Harvard

Michael Larson
Hudson, WI

Services provided in East MN and West WI

Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 10/31/08, 11:27 AM
Christopher Currins's Avatar
Christopher Currins Christopher Currins is offline
InterNACHI Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Godfrey, IL
Posts: 7,626
Default Re: Is this correct

Here's another link that I include when I find double taps, All Burned Up



Christopher Currins
Certified, Licensed

Proudly serving the St.Louis Metro

St. Charles, St. Peters, Maryland Heights,
O'Fallon, Florrisant, MO Home Inspector




BLESSED ARE THE CRACKED, FOR THEY ARE THE ONES WHO LET IN THE "LIGHT"!
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 10/31/08, 1:53 PM
Jeffrey R. Wicklander's Avatar
Jeffrey R. Wicklander Jeffrey R. Wicklander is offline
InterNACHI Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Lake Forest, Il
Posts: 1,223
Default Re: Is this correct

Quote:
Originally Posted by mlarson View Post
It never has been permitted technically by UL67 and under NEC 110.3(B).

It was clarified in NEC 408.21

Even Mike Holt was confused by this issue.

Video link

Holt's comment:

Switchboards and Panelboards
408.21 Grounded Conductor Terminations
Intent: This new section should ensure that grounded (neutral) conductors terminate within the panelboard to an individual terminal. This has been a UL requirement (UL Std. 67 – Panelboard Standard) for some time, and the addition to the NEC is intended to bring this information to the installers. Technically, this is covered by 110.3(B), which requires all equipment to be installed in accordance with the manufacturer's installation instructions and markings, but nobody knew it existed. UL Std. 67 (Panelboard Standard) permits up to three 10 AWG equipment grounding conductors to terminate on a single terminal, if the terminal is marked for this purpose. Figure 408-3

The intent of this requirement is to ensure that the grounded (neutral) conductor of a multiwire branch circuit is not momentarily disconnected, which could result in the destruction of electrical equipment and fires from overvoltage.

In 2005, this reference was moved to 408.41, for whatever reason. In case people are trying to search for it.

Jeff
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 10/31/08, 1:59 PM
Michael Larson's Avatar
Michael Larson Michael Larson is offline
InterNACHI Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Hudson, WI including the Twin Cities of MN
Posts: 32,090
Default Re: Is this correct

Quote:
Originally Posted by jwicklander View Post
In 2005, this reference was moved to 408.41, for whatever reason. In case people are trying to search for it.

Jeff
That is correct.Thank you. The Holt video was discussing the 2002 NEC.



You can argue with intelligent people but to argue with a mush head is like trying to grab fog-Thomas Sowell

Never underestimate the difficulty of changing false beliefs by facts. - Henry Rosovsky-Harvard

Michael Larson
Hudson, WI

Services provided in East MN and West WI

Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 10/31/08, 2:05 PM
Joseph M. Whitt Joseph M. Whitt is offline
InterNACHI Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: NC
Posts: 123
Default Re: Is this correct

Quote:
Originally Posted by mlarson View Post
It never has been permitted technically by UL67 and under NEC 110.3(B).

It was clarified in NEC 408.21

Even Mike Holt was confused by this issue.

Video link

Holt's comment:

Switchboards and Panelboards
408.21 Grounded Conductor Terminations
Intent: This new section should ensure that grounded (neutral) conductors terminate within the panelboard to an individual terminal. This has been a UL requirement (UL Std. 67 – Panelboard Standard) for some time, and the addition to the NEC is intended to bring this information to the installers. Technically, this is covered by 110.3(B), which requires all equipment to be installed in accordance with the manufacturer's installation instructions and markings, but nobody knew it existed. UL Std. 67 (Panelboard Standard) permits up to three 10 AWG equipment grounding conductors to terminate on a single terminal, if the terminal is marked for this purpose. Figure 408-3

The intent of this requirement is to ensure that the grounded (neutral) conductor of a multiwire branch circuit is not momentarily disconnected, which could result in the destruction of electrical equipment and fires from overvoltage.
Michael

It is very important that the Home inspector understand that UL Standard 67 was a manufacturing standard and is/was not part of the listing and labeling of any panel board.

A copy of UL Standard 67 cost $1200 today and wasn’t much cheaper back in the 80s. For something to be part of the listing and labeling of a piece of equipment it must be furnished with the equipment when it is sold. It can not be something that is sold separately.

There are still panels that have sit on shelves for years that on the label will allow more than one grounded neutral under one screw. The code section was adopted in order to make all installation of both old and new panels.



Mike Whitt
Contractor/Instructor
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Correct term gporter Inspecting HVAC Systems 3 2/26/08 9:29 AM
near correct condensate drain bking Inspecting HVAC Systems 2 9/19/07 1:51 PM
Correct connect at Furnace tmartens Plumbing Inspections 2 5/1/07 9:33 PM
First to answer this question substantially correct wins a NACHI Beam. $109 value. gromicko Miscellaneous Discussion for Inspectors 28 1/30/07 4:30 PM
Is this correct cpennick Electrical Inspections 4 6/15/06 10:15 PM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 5:57 AM.


Popular Sections

:

All Sections

Inspection News

InterNACHI Membership

Inspection Standards

Inspection Education

InterNACHI Inspectors

Inspection Links

 

 

 

NACHI.ORG Statistics

 

 

no new posts