International Association of Certified Home Inspectors
|
|||||||
| Electrical Inspections Contains discussions about electrical systems. This includes receptacles, panels, wiring, etc. |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools |
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
Inspected a home today and it looks like the grounds and neutral are tied together. Is this correct? This was a Cutler Hammer panel circa 1978 I think
|
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Ronald, as this appears to be the panel containg the main disconnect having the Neutrals and grounds on the same bus is OK, however I would question the multiple tapping of the Neutrals, they really should be seperately terminated on the bus. Regards Gerry "To realize our true destiny, we must be guided not by a myth from our past, but by a vision of our future." (Mark B Adams) Commercial property Inspection Tampa, Orlando, Sarasota, Jacksonville, Ft Launderdale, Miami, Florida. NACHI cell 484-429-5466 NACHI02121106 |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
It is fine as long as the house main breaker is in the panel. The neutral is required to be bonded to the enclosure at the main disconnect location. If the Main was outside by the meter then the the grounds and neutrals should be isolated from each other in the interior panel.
|
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
The effort made braiding the wires to fit under one screw compared to using the empty screws ... tips me off to look closer at the electrical work. Common sense seems uncommon here.
Tom |
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
|
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
agreed, but was this not a common practice Gerry???
|
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
I think it was common in some areas of the country, but not in my area. I don't see double tapped neutrals or combined neutral-grounds all that often.
|
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
|
Double lugged neutrals are a common practice here and I write every one of them up. |
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
|
Thank you gentlemen for your expertise
|
|
#10
|
||||
|
||||
|
Hi Jim, so was pushing 5 year olds up chimneys
but we think we know better these days Seriously though, The code on double tapping neutrals came in in the early 1980's if memory serves, and the picture that was posted appears to feature quad & quin taps Regards Gerry "To realize our true destiny, we must be guided not by a myth from our past, but by a vision of our future." (Mark B Adams) Commercial property Inspection Tampa, Orlando, Sarasota, Jacksonville, Ft Launderdale, Miami, Florida. NACHI cell 484-429-5466 NACHI02121106 |
|
#11
|
||||
|
||||
|
It never has been permitted technically by UL67 and under NEC 110.3(B).
It was clarified in NEC 408.21 Even Mike Holt was confused by this issue. Video link Holt's comment: Switchboards and Panelboards 408.21 Grounded Conductor Terminations Intent: This new section should ensure that grounded (neutral) conductors terminate within the panelboard to an individual terminal. This has been a UL requirement (UL Std. 67 – Panelboard Standard) for some time, and the addition to the NEC is intended to bring this information to the installers. Technically, this is covered by 110.3(B), which requires all equipment to be installed in accordance with the manufacturer's installation instructions and markings, but nobody knew it existed. UL Std. 67 (Panelboard Standard) permits up to three 10 AWG equipment grounding conductors to terminate on a single terminal, if the terminal is marked for this purpose. Figure 408-3 The intent of this requirement is to ensure that the grounded (neutral) conductor of a multiwire branch circuit is not momentarily disconnected, which could result in the destruction of electrical equipment and fires from overvoltage. You can argue with intelligent people but to argue with a mush head is like trying to grab fog-Thomas Sowell |
|
#12
|
||||
|
||||
|
Here's another link that I include when I find double taps, All Burned Up
Christopher Currins Certified, Licensed Proudly serving the St.Louis Metro St. Charles, St. Peters, Maryland Heights, O'Fallon, Florrisant, MO Home Inspector BLESSED ARE THE CRACKED, FOR THEY ARE THE ONES WHO LET IN THE "LIGHT"!
|
|
#13
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
In 2005, this reference was moved to 408.41, for whatever reason. In case people are trying to search for it. Jeff |
|
#14
|
||||
|
||||
|
That is correct.Thank you. The Holt video was discussing the 2002 NEC.
You can argue with intelligent people but to argue with a mush head is like trying to grab fog-Thomas Sowell |
|
#15
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
It is very important that the Home inspector understand that UL Standard 67 was a manufacturing standard and is/was not part of the listing and labeling of any panel board. A copy of UL Standard 67 cost $1200 today and wasn’t much cheaper back in the 80s. For something to be part of the listing and labeling of a piece of equipment it must be furnished with the equipment when it is sold. It can not be something that is sold separately. There are still panels that have sit on shelves for years that on the label will allow more than one grounded neutral under one screw. The code section was adopted in order to make all installation of both old and new panels. Mike Whitt Contractor/Instructor |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Correct term | gporter | Inspecting HVAC Systems | 3 | 2/26/08 9:29 AM |
| near correct condensate drain | bking | Inspecting HVAC Systems | 2 | 9/19/07 1:51 PM |
| Correct connect at Furnace | tmartens | Plumbing Inspections | 2 | 5/1/07 9:33 PM |
| First to answer this question substantially correct wins a NACHI Beam. $109 value. | gromicko | Miscellaneous Discussion for Inspectors | 28 | 1/30/07 4:30 PM |
| Is this correct | cpennick | Electrical Inspections | 4 | 6/15/06 10:15 PM |