InterNACHI


Go Back   InterNACHI Inspection Forum > Specific Inspection Topics > Electrical Inspections

Notices

Electrical Inspections Contains discussions about electrical systems. This includes receptacles, panels, wiring, etc.

 
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
  #1  
Old 7/31/07, 9:58 AM
Jason R. Satterthwaite Jason R. Satterthwaite is offline
InterNACHI Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Indianapolis, IN
Posts: 4
Exclamation Does anyone see an issue with this?

Inspected a new home, (less than 5 years) the other day and ran across this. Power in the entire home was pulled in 12-2 w/ground, all general use circuits set on 20A breakers. Coming from an electrical background, I like that since everyone has so many electronics today. What I didn't like is that on the lighting circuits that were visable, (unfinished rooms) the electrician pulled 12-2 w/ground for the power and 14-2 w/ground for the switchlegs to the lighting fixtures. Code states (in the year this house was built) that you can not run a 20A circuit on a 14-2 which is what is pulled to every light. When you put recessed cans on a circuit it makes that 14-2 run very long.

How would you write this up on a report? Or would you even mention it? Or am I letting my electrical background get in the way?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 7/31/07, 10:12 AM
George P. Wells, CMI's Avatar
George P. Wells, CMI George P. Wells, CMI is offline
InterNACHI Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Michigan
Posts: 554
Send a message via Skype™ to gwells
Angry Re: Does anyone see an issue with this?

Quote:
Originally Posted by jsatterthwaite
Code states (in the year this house was built) that you can not run a 20A circuit on a 14-2 which is what is pulled to every light. When you put recessed cans on a circuit it makes that 14-2 run very long.

How would you write this up on a report? Or would you even mention it? Or am I letting my electrical background get in the way?
Are you saying that the lighting circuits have 14-2 w/g on 20A breakers? If so, It needs to be mentioned on your report. I would list it as a major defect.



BestInspectors.Net
& Real Estate Training Academy

Inspection Report Software for
Windows - iOS - Mac - Android

Continuing Education
Home and Commercial Building Inspection - Skilled Trades – Real Estate – Appraisal – NFPA 921

http://www.bestinspectors.net

est. 1992
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 7/31/07, 10:16 AM
Larry D. Kage Larry D. Kage is offline
InterNACHI Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Lake Ann (Traverse City), MI
Posts: 8,848
Default Re: Does anyone see an issue with this?

Quote:
Originally Posted by jsatterthwaite
Inspected a new home, (less than 5 years) the other day and ran across this. Power in the entire home was pulled in 12-2 w/ground, all general use circuits set on 20A breakers. Coming from an electrical background, I like that since everyone has so many electronics today. What I didn't like is that on the lighting circuits that were visable, (unfinished rooms) the electrician pulled 12-2 w/ground for the power and 14-2 w/ground for the switchlegs to the lighting fixtures. Code states (in the year this house was built) that you can not run a 20A circuit on a 14-2 which is what is pulled to every light. When you put recessed cans on a circuit it makes that 14-2 run very long.

How would you write this up on a report? Or would you even mention it? Or am I letting my electrical background get in the way?
It sounds like what you are saying is that the branch wires are undersized for the installed breaker which is a safety hazard and I would report it as that.



InterNachi Awards Portal: http://co.nachi.org/inachiawards/

____________________________________________
"An Education, not just an Inspection"

Larry Kage, CMI
Lake Ann (Traverse City), Michigan 49650
231 929 3525


Professional Inspector serving the Traverse City, Michigan area and beyond.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 7/31/07, 10:33 AM
rdawes's Avatar
rdawes rdawes is offline
Active Poster
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Plano, TX
Posts: 427
Please Note: rdawes is a non-member guest and is in no way affiliated with InterNACHI or its members.
Default Re: Does anyone see an issue with this?

I think what he is saying that they ran #12 to the light switch and #14 from the switch to the light fixture. Therefore if there was a high load downstream from the switch you would have a 20 amp breaker with #14 wiring involved.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 7/31/07, 11:17 AM
Jason R. Satterthwaite Jason R. Satterthwaite is offline
InterNACHI Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Indianapolis, IN
Posts: 4
Default Re: Does anyone see an issue with this?

Quote:
Originally Posted by rdawes
I think what he is saying that they ran #12 to the light switch and #14 from the switch to the light fixture. Therefore if there was a high load downstream from the switch you would have a 20 amp breaker with #14 wiring involved.
The problem that I had in writting this up is two-fold.

1. This wiring was done by a qualified electrical contractor while the home was being built. I have yet to see an electrical contractor do something like this. I don't understand how this company would be allowed to continue with wiring homes if this was against code.

2. If the entire home is wired in this fashion, how could the county inspector not note this on this house or any other houses that this contractor wired.

With my background, I had to write this up in the report. However, i wanted to get multiple views on this issue from other inspectors on how everyone would write this up. Like Dawes said, it will put one hell of a load on the wire if there is say 10 recessed cans on one switch because all those cans are pulled in 14-2. I felt this was an issue and wrote that up in the report in that fashion.

Last edited by jsatterthwaite; 7/31/07 at 11:20 AM..
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 7/31/07, 11:42 AM
Michael Larson's Avatar
Michael Larson Michael Larson is offline
InterNACHI Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Hudson, WI including the Twin Cities of MN
Posts: 32,090
Default Re: Does anyone see an issue with this?

Write it up as 14 AWG wire protected by 20 Amp breaker which is in excess of it's rating and may cause overheating of wiring under certain load conditions.

Simple fix is to replace the circuit breakers that has the 14 AWG on them with 15A breakers.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 7/31/07, 2:48 PM
Mike Whitt's Avatar
Mike Whitt Mike Whitt is offline
Unmoderated Guest
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 477
Please Note: Mike Whitt is a non-member guest and is in no way affiliated with InterNACHI or its members.
Default Re: Does anyone see an issue with this?

Quote:
Originally Posted by jsatterthwaite
1. This wiring was done by a qualified electrical contractor while the home was being built.
I must question this statement but understand why you made it.

Quote:
Originally Posted by jsatterthwaite
2. If the entire home is wired in this fashion, how could the county inspector not note this on this house or any other houses that this contractor wired.
This goes to show that inspectors are human also.

The inspector probably didn’t know any better. As an instructor for electrical inspectors I can say without a doubt that some wouldn’t know the deference and some would be afraid to question about something that they have doubt about.

A very good call on your part.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 7/31/07, 8:48 PM
Speedy Petey Speedy Petey is offline
Unmoderated Guest
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 1,297
Please Note: Speedy Petey is a non-member guest and is in no way affiliated with InterNACHI or its members.
Default Re: Does anyone see an issue with this?

I have heard that wiring lighting circuits this way was/is common in some areas, and is accepted by inspectors.

For the life of me I can't understand why.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 7/31/07, 10:24 PM
rmoewe's Avatar
rmoewe rmoewe is offline
InterNACHI Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Brentwood, TN
Posts: 145
Default Re: Does anyone see an issue with this?

It was actually a very good catch. This happens more times than we can see. Once the sheetrock is up, you cant see it in a normal inspection.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 8/1/07, 12:54 AM
Greg Fretwell Greg Fretwell is offline
Active Poster
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Estero Florida
Posts: 1,798
Please Note: Greg Fretwell is a non-member guest and is in no way affiliated with InterNACHI or its members.
Default Re: Does anyone see an issue with this?

The reason why an inspector might not get very concerned is you are serving a fixed load (similar to "fixture wires" that can be #18. As long as you don't have 1440w worth of lights on a switch leg, there is no particular hazard.
It is still against code. 240.4(D)
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Cutler-Hammer CH breaker issue Marc D. Shunk Electrical Inspections 4 5/27/07 2:04 PM
Robust views on issue of home inspectors wblakey Canadian Inspectors 0 11/24/06 5:49 PM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 8:52 AM.


Popular Sections

:

All Sections

Inspection News

InterNACHI Membership

Inspection Standards

Inspection Education

InterNACHI Inspectors

Inspection Links

 

 

 

NACHI.ORG Statistics

 

 

no new posts