InterNACHI


Go Back   InterNACHI Message Board > Specific Inspection Topics > Electrical

Notices

Electrical Contains discussions about electrical systems. This includes outlets, panels, wiring, et cetera.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
  #1  
Old 7/22/09, 10:41 PM
acassady's Avatar
acassady acassady is offline
InterNACHI Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Waynesville, MO
Posts: 118
Default doubletap question

Fount this in an electrical panel today. The bottom right breaker has a doubletap to a box laying in the bottom of the panel. The breaker states if is for the smoke alarms...any idea what this box is?
Attached Thumbnails
doubletap-question-dscf3423.jpg   doubletap-question-dscf3425.jpg  
Reply With Quote
Find an InterNACHI certified Alaska Home Inspector (and anywhere else in North America)
  #2  
Old 7/22/09, 10:58 PM
Kevin L. Luce Kevin L. Luce is offline
InterNACHI Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Highland, Indiana
Posts: 260
Default Re: doubletap question

Quote:
Originally Posted by acassady View Post
Fount this in an electrical panel today. The bottom right breaker has a doubletap to a box laying in the bottom of the panel. The breaker states if is for the smoke alarms...any idea what this box is?
Transformer

Not allowed to be installed in the electrical service box.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 7/22/09, 11:03 PM
Mitch A. Harris Mitch A. Harris is offline
InterNACHI Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Hutchinson, KS
Posts: 91
Default Re: doubletap question

Did it have door bell wires coming off of it. From the pic it looks like a transformer for low voltage.



[]Mitch Harris
Harris Home Inspections
mitch@harrishomeinspections.com
Your Central Kansas Pro-Sight affiliate
www.prosightinspections.com/HHI
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 7/22/09, 11:05 PM
acassady's Avatar
acassady acassady is offline
InterNACHI Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Waynesville, MO
Posts: 118
Default Re: doubletap question

So what would be the verbage on this? Double tapped breaker and low voltage transformer found in electrical panel recommend an electrician evaluate and repair as needed?
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 7/22/09, 11:27 PM
Kevin L. Luce Kevin L. Luce is offline
InterNACHI Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Highland, Indiana
Posts: 260
Default Re: doubletap question

Quote:
Originally Posted by acassady View Post
So what would be the verbage on this? Double tapped breaker and low voltage transformer found in electrical panel recommend an electrician evaluate and repair as needed?
Keep it simple.

Double tap noticed at lower right breaker. This brand of breaker is designed for only one wire per connection . Correction is recommended to ensure proper performance and to provide proper protection to home occupants.

Transformer is improperly installed in main electrical panel. Transformer needs to be relocated outside the main electrical box to prevent damage to low voltage wiring which can lead to fire/injury.

People may disagree with some of the wording I just typed but you get the idea.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 7/22/09, 11:31 PM
Mitch A. Harris Mitch A. Harris is offline
InterNACHI Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Hutchinson, KS
Posts: 91
Default Re: doubletap question

Anthony I think that verbage is fine, I have never seen a transformer in a panel before, but I also didn't no transformers were not allowed in a panel, so I learned something from Kevin today.



[]Mitch Harris
Harris Home Inspections
mitch@harrishomeinspections.com
Your Central Kansas Pro-Sight affiliate
www.prosightinspections.com/HHI
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 7/24/09, 5:53 PM
Frank P. Newman Frank P. Newman is offline
InterNACHI Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Dublin, GA
Posts: 544
Default Re: doubletap question

This arrangement is seen a lot in older house in my area.



Frank P. Newman
Emerald City Inspections, LLC
Dublin, GA
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 7/24/09, 8:07 PM
Ron Bibler Ron Bibler is offline
InterNACHI Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Healdsburg Ca
Posts: 653
Default Re: doubletap question

UFO. L.O.L. Unauthorized Foreign Object...

Best

Ron
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 7/25/09, 10:27 AM
Paul W. Abernathy's Avatar
Paul W. Abernathy Paul W. Abernathy is offline
InterNACHI Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Harrisonburg, VA
Posts: 7,697
Send a message via AIM to pabernathy Send a message via MSN to pabernathy Send a message via Skype™ to pabernathy
Default Re: doubletap question

Many people have e-mailed me to ask where specifically is this a violation of the National Electrical Code in order to base it on a safety standpoint. I guess my first response would be this :

1.) The XFMR is not mounted and installed in accordance with the listing of the manufactures specifications.

I would then move onto where the NEC says the following :

725.136 Separation from Electric Light, Power, Class 1,
Non–Power-Limited Fire Alarm Circuit Conductors,
and Medium-Power Network-Powered Broadband
Communications Cables.

(A) General. Cables and conductors of Class 2 and Class 3
circuits shall not be placed in any cable, cable tray, compartment,
enclosure, manhole, outlet box, device box, raceway,
or similar fitting with conductors of electric light,
power, Class 1, non–power-limited fire alarm circuits, and
medium-power network-powered broadband communications
circuits unless permitted by 725.136(B) through (I).

Now in the case of many panels used for fire alarm systems or surround sound type designs, the enclosures are manufactured and UL approved with the proper seperation as given below in furthur reading of the sub-section.


(B) Separated by Barriers.
Class 2 and Class 3 circuits
shall be permitted to be installed together with the conductors
of electric light, power, Class 1, non–power-limited fire alarm
and medium power network-powered broadband communications
circuits where they are separated by a barrier.

(C) Raceways Within Enclosures.


In enclosures, Class 2
and Class 3 circuits shall be permitted to be installed in a
raceway to separate them from Class 1, non–power-limited
fire alarm and medium-power network-powered broadband
communications circuits.

Just so you know....the last one has to do with internal wiring of components within a specific piece of associated equipment. This also provides the needed seperation.

Now onto the safety issues, added heat build up and potential for damage to other conductors within the enclosure.

Hope this was helpful in explaining where the violation and safety concern concern has it's roots.




Paul W. Abernathy,CMI,CEI,CEPE
National Electrical Code Expert-ONLY
Weekly Live Chat :http://www.theelectricalguru.com/chat.html
Weekly Chat on Mondays & Wednesdays -8PM E.S.T
* Notice- I will not be conducting any future seminars for the HI Industry. I am a CODE GUY so I will be focusing efforts on the NEC Code. If you have CODE question visit my website...if you have Electrical HI questions ask Nick or Ben Gromicko.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Sump Pit/Pump Question Joey D'Adamo Plumbing 4 11/26/08 1:04 PM
Question for all... Bob Hopton-Jones General Inspection Discussion 9 4/6/07 7:43 AM
Basement Bathroom Venting Question Sean M. Jeric Plumbing 4 3/20/07 11:56 PM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 5:18 AM.


Popular Sections

:

All Sections

Popular

Membership

Inspection Standards

Education

Chapters & Members

Articles & Links

Other Organizations

 

 

 

NACHI.ORG Statistics

 

 

no new posts