International Association of Certified Home Inspectors
|
|||||||
| Electrical Contains discussions about electrical systems. This includes outlets, panels, wiring, et cetera. |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Please Note:
hziegenbein is a non-member guest and is in no way affiliated with InterNACHI or its members.
This panel is in a condo I inspected today. It looks good to me except I didn't see a ground of any sort. Am I right about calling out the ground? Did I miss anything else? Thanks for any input.
Hans |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
Typically a condo is load-side equipment.
Maybe they used the conduit for the grounding? Also, if load-side equipment, the neutral bar doesn't appear isolated with that green screw installed. ____________________________________________ "An Education, not just an Inspection" Larry Kage Lake Ann (Traverse City), Michigan 49650 231 929 3525 Professional Inspector and Infrared Thermographer serving the Traverse City, Michigan area and beyond. ITC/FLIR CERTIFIED BUILDING SCIENCES THERMOGRAPHER ITC/FLIR CERTIFIED LEVEL 1 THERMOGRAPHER
|
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
Please Note:
Marc D. Shunk is a non-member guest and is in no way affiliated with InterNACHI or its members.
If it's wired in pipe, the pipe is permitted to serve as the ground. He's right, that if this is an installation where the pipe is the ground, that bond screw needs to disappear.
|
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
Please Note:
hziegenbein is a non-member guest and is in no way affiliated with InterNACHI or its members.
Thanks for the input on the conduit being used as the ground, it is attached to rigid metal conduit. The bond screw is attached to the neutral bar but not attached to or touching anything else, it just sticks out behind where you see ti screwed in, it didn't appear to really be doing anything. Do you still think it needs to be removed?
Thanks |
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
It looks like it is all the way in, if not it must be too short.
I would make sure it is not reaching the panel hole and would still disclose that it is electrically correct but present where someone could tighten it therefore it should be removed. B.A. King Home Inspections, LLC www.BAKingHomeInspections.com Serving Charlotte NC area and Rock Hill SC areas. CMI Certified Master Inspector and Independent 704 301-3207 |
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
Agreed....If that panel is indeed a "remote" distribution panel and the conduit is being used as the 4th conductor ( technically speaking ) then yes indeed the bonding screw needs to be removed.
Paul W. Abernathy,CMI,CEI,CEPE NECŪ Consultant/Columnist www.twitter.com/ElectricalGuru - ICC & IAEI Certified Electrical Inspector - ICC & IAEI Certified Electrical Plans Examiner - Look for my article in the Nov/Dec 2009 IAEI Magazine - 2007 "Top Gun" Winner - Mike Holt Enterprises " visit www.TheElectricalGuru.com Today !" |
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
Please Note:
Speedy Petey is a non-member guest and is in no way affiliated with InterNACHI or its members.
Also that 60 amp back-feed breaker needs to be secured.
|
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
(F) Back-Fed Devices Plug-in-type overcurrent protection devices or plug-in type main lug assemblies that are backfed and used to terminate field-installed ungrounded supply conductors shall be secured in place by an additional fastener that requires other than a pull to release the device from the mounting means on the panel. Paul W. Abernathy,CMI,CEI,CEPE NECŪ Consultant/Columnist www.twitter.com/ElectricalGuru - ICC & IAEI Certified Electrical Inspector - ICC & IAEI Certified Electrical Plans Examiner - Look for my article in the Nov/Dec 2009 IAEI Magazine - 2007 "Top Gun" Winner - Mike Holt Enterprises " visit www.TheElectricalGuru.com Today !" |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Download the videos here all about physics and electricity | jtedesco1 | Electrical | 5 | 9/14/08 4:58 PM |
| Electrical Panel Installation | csteele | Electrical | 11 | 9/19/06 10:30 AM |
| Electrical panel popping | senomoto | Electrical | 17 | 6/18/06 12:17 PM |
| Chicagoland Electrical Code Ordinance | jtedesco1 | Electrical | 0 | 6/16/06 3:10 PM |
| Sup panel question? | jlybolt | Electrical | 23 | 6/12/06 9:42 PM |