InterNACHI


Go Back   InterNACHI Inspection Forum > Specific Inspection Topics > Electrical Inspections

Notices

Electrical Inspections Contains discussions about electrical systems. This includes receptacles, panels, wiring, etc.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
  #1  
Old 8/28/08, 2:26 AM
Raymond N. Newman Raymond N. Newman is offline
InterNACHI Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Avondale, AZ
Posts: 128
Send a message via Skype™ to rnewman1
Default To Be or not to be GFCI

A receptacle below the bathroom sink in the cabinet (you have to open a cabinet door), would that fall under the exception rule (1) not needed to be GFCI protected since it is not readily accessible ??
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 8/28/08, 3:49 AM
psiposs psiposs is offline
InterNACHI Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Liberty Lake, WA
Posts: 243
Send a message via Yahoo to psiposs
Default Re: To Be or not to be GFCI

The GFCI function is for the person using the appliance plugged in. Can a hair dryer for example be plugged in and reach the sink? I say it should be GFCI protected.



Peter Siposs
Absolute Home Inspections
Home, Mold, IAQ, Radon, & Lead Based Paint
Liberty Lake, WA
Serving Eastern WA & Northern ID
Nachi# 05100181
peter@absolute-home-inspections.com
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 8/28/08, 8:48 AM
Greg Fretwell Greg Fretwell is offline
Active Poster
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Estero Florida
Posts: 1,798
Please Note: Greg Fretwell is a non-member guest and is in no way affiliated with InterNACHI or its members.
Default Re: To Be or not to be GFCI

What exception? 210.8(A)(1) just says "bathrooms".
All 15 and 20a 120v receptacles in the bathroom must have GFCI protection without exception. (at least as far back as 1975)

I think you are confusing other parts of 210.8 that did have exceptions but they don't apply to the bathroom.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 8/28/08, 10:24 AM
Raymond N. Newman Raymond N. Newman is offline
InterNACHI Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Avondale, AZ
Posts: 128
Send a message via Skype™ to rnewman1
Default Re: To Be or not to be GFCI

NEC 2002 210.8 (A)
Exception No.1 Receptacles that are not readily accessible.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 8/28/08, 10:38 AM
Speedy Petey Speedy Petey is offline
Unmoderated Guest
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 1,297
Please Note: Speedy Petey is a non-member guest and is in no way affiliated with InterNACHI or its members.
Default Re: To Be or not to be GFCI

Quote:
Originally Posted by rnewman1
NEC 2002 210.8 (A)
Exception No.1 Receptacles that are not readily accessible.
Again, WHAT exception.
There are NO exceptions to "210.8(A)(1) Bathrooms".
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 8/28/08, 11:53 AM
Jim Port Jim Port is offline
Unmoderated Guest
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Maryland
Posts: 746
Please Note: Jim Port is a non-member guest and is in no way affiliated with InterNACHI or its members.
Default Re: To Be or not to be GFCI

Quite a contrast to the post, I don't remember if it was here, where HI wanted GFI protection for dining room receptacle on the other side of a pass thru that was within 6' of the kitchen sink.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 8/28/08, 12:46 PM
Speedy Petey Speedy Petey is offline
Unmoderated Guest
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 1,297
Please Note: Speedy Petey is a non-member guest and is in no way affiliated with InterNACHI or its members.
Default Re: To Be or not to be GFCI

He can "want" all he wants. That "request" holds no water.

210.8 Ground-Fault Circuit-Interrupter Protection for Personnel
(A)(6) Kitchens — where the receptacles are installed to serve the countertop surfaces
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 8/28/08, 12:51 PM
Mike Whitt's Avatar
Mike Whitt Mike Whitt is offline
Unmoderated Guest
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 477
Please Note: Mike Whitt is a non-member guest and is in no way affiliated with InterNACHI or its members.
Default Re: To Be or not to be GFCI

Quote:
Originally Posted by rnewman1
NEC 2002 210.8 (A)
Exception No.1 Receptacles that are not readily accessible.
Ray,

Visit the other site for a full explanation of this
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 8/28/08, 2:04 PM
Greg Fretwell Greg Fretwell is offline
Active Poster
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Estero Florida
Posts: 1,798
Please Note: Greg Fretwell is a non-member guest and is in no way affiliated with InterNACHI or its members.
Default Re: To Be or not to be GFCI

The short answer is the exception you are looking at is to 210.8(A)(2) and does not apply to 210.8(A)(1). Two separate rules.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 8/28/08, 2:46 PM
Raymond N. Newman Raymond N. Newman is offline
InterNACHI Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Avondale, AZ
Posts: 128
Send a message via Skype™ to rnewman1
Default Re: To Be or not to be GFCI

Thanks Mike
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
AFCI Questions and Answers - Mike Holt pabernathy Electrical Inspections 2 1/8/11 8:04 PM
More GFCI info from U/L Greg Fretwell Electrical Inspections 9 12/4/07 9:33 PM
GFCI Safety Notice rcooke Electrical Inspections 1 10/30/07 1:29 PM
The question asked on the new HI Study test here? jtedesco1 Electrical Inspections 28 10/4/06 10:31 AM
UL Information about Testing of GFCIs jtedesco1 Electrical Inspections 0 2/5/06 5:38 PM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 3:30 AM.


Popular Sections

:

All Sections

Inspection News

InterNACHI Membership

Inspection Standards

Inspection Education

InterNACHI Inspectors

Inspection Links

 

 

 

NACHI.ORG Statistics

 

 

no new posts