International Association of Certified Home Inspectors
|
|||||||
| Electrical Inspections Contains discussions about electrical systems. This includes receptacles, panels, wiring, etc. |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools |
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
I cannot remember what is the maximum of romex insulation allowed in a service panel. I was thinking less than an inch, cannot find anything to support my thinking. A service panel today had 5-7 inches of romex insulation left on the circuits.
"He is no fool who gives what he cannot keep to gain that which he cannot lose." Jim Elliot 1949 Gerald Wilcox Harvey, ND CMIA, RMT www.housecheckhomeinspections.com www.homeinspectorinnorthdakota.com 701.324.4075 Minot, ND Home Inspections Devil's Lake, ND Home Inspections Bismarck, ND Home Inspections Jamestown, ND Home Inspections Home Inspector in North Dakota North Dakota Home Inspection |
| Need a home inspection in Indiana? Check out InterNACHI's listing of Indiana certified home inspectors. Or, find a home inspector anywhere in the world with our inspection search engine. |
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Please Note:
Robert Meier is a non-member guest and is in no way affiliated with InterNACHI or its members.
The NEC has no maximum length that NM cable can enter a panelboard. The closest thing you might find is Electrical equipment shall be installed in a neat and workmanlike manner which is, IMO unenforceable.
|
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
Thanks Robert!
"He is no fool who gives what he cannot keep to gain that which he cannot lose." Jim Elliot 1949 Gerald Wilcox Harvey, ND CMIA, RMT www.housecheckhomeinspections.com www.homeinspectorinnorthdakota.com 701.324.4075 Minot, ND Home Inspections Devil's Lake, ND Home Inspections Bismarck, ND Home Inspections Jamestown, ND Home Inspections Home Inspector in North Dakota North Dakota Home Inspection |
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
IMO excessive cable sheathing inside a panel it's a sign of poor workmanship or Harry Homeowner wiring. Red flags go up when I see that.
Robert O'Connor, PE Consulting Engineer & Inspector LIU CW Post Adjunct Professor NACHI Education Committee www.reporthost.com/-rjo I am absolutely amazed sometimes by how much thought goes into doing things wrong ... |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
In all the literature I have read most say no more than one inch
Greg Mathias, CCHI Journeyman Carpenter Global Property Inspections Lloydminster, AB. Canada (780)205-9912 |
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
This is considered "best practice," but there is no requirement that limits the amount.
IF YOUR INSPECTOR IS NOT USING THERMAL IMAGING, YOU'RE NOT GETTING THE WHOLE PICTURE ® Jeff PopeJPI Home Inspection Service Santa Clarita CA (661) 212-0738 Santa Clarita Home Inspection http://www.MyInspector.net |
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
IC good to know. I have been calling it up, maybe I should'nt be.
Greg Mathias, CCHI Journeyman Carpenter Global Property Inspections Lloydminster, AB. Canada (780)205-9912 |
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
Please Note:
Jim Port is a non-member guest and is in no way affiliated with InterNACHI or its members.
No different in the panel than when it is in the wall. You are however required to have 6" of free conductor inside the box.
BTW, the minimum required by the NEC is 1/4" inside the panel or box. Last edited by Jim Port; 8/17/11 at 8:35 PM.. |
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
|
Please Note:
Robert Meier is a non-member guest and is in no way affiliated with InterNACHI or its members.
Jim, where are you finding this 1/4" minimum requirement in the NEC for NM cable?
|
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
|
Please Note:
Jim Port is a non-member guest and is in no way affiliated with InterNACHI or its members.
That would be 314.17(C) 2002. I don't believe it has moved.
|
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
|
(C) Nonmetallic Boxes and Conduit Bodies. Nonmetallic
boxes and conduit bodies shall be suitable for the lowest temperature-rated conductor entering the box. Where nonmetallic boxes and conduit bodies are used with messengersupported wiring, open wiring on insulators, or concealed knob-and-tube wiring, the conductors shall enter the box through individual holes. Where flexible tubing is used to enclose the conductors, the tubing shall extend from the last insulating support to not less than 6 mm (1⁄4 in.) inside the box and beyond any cable clamp. Where nonmetallicsheathed cable or multiconductor Type UF cable is used, the sheath shall extend not less than 6 mm (1⁄4 in.) inside the box and beyond any cable clamp. In all instances, all permitted wiring methods shall be secured to the boxes. Exception: Where nonmetallic-sheathed cable or multiconductor Type UF cable is used with single gang boxes not larger than a nominal size 57 mm × 100 mm (21⁄4 in. × 4 in.) mounted in walls or ceilings, and where the cable is fastened within 200 mm (8 in.) of the box measured along the sheath and where the sheath extends through a cable knockout not less than 6 mm (1⁄4 in.), securing the cable to the box shall not be required. Multiple cable entries shall be permitted in a single cable knockout opening. Paul W. Abernathy |
|
#12
|
||||
|
||||
|
Please Note:
Robert Meier is a non-member guest and is in no way affiliated with InterNACHI or its members.
I'm not seeing how that would apply to NM cables entering a panel.
Quote:
|
|
#13
|
|||
|
|||
|
Please Note:
Jim Port is a non-member guest and is in no way affiliated with InterNACHI or its members.
Cable clamps would be used as the cable enters the box and I would consider the enclosure a box also.
|
| Need a home inspection in Indiana? Check out InterNACHI's listing of Indiana certified home inspectors. Or, find a home inspector anywhere in the world with our inspection search engine. |
|
#14
|
||||
|
||||
|
Please Note:
Robert Meier is a non-member guest and is in no way affiliated with InterNACHI or its members.
314.17(C) is only for Nonmetallic Boxes and Conduit Bodies.
|
|
#15
|
|||
|
|||
|
Please Note:
Jim Port is a non-member guest and is in no way affiliated with InterNACHI or its members.
I see your point about this only stating NM boxes. I don't see why it would not apply to metallic boxes or where cable clamps are used on metallic boxes, but don't know if I could find words to support it. 314.17(B) leaves out NM-B when talking about metallic boxes. IMO the same requirements should apply even tho it is not specified. After all why would it be allowable for the sheath not need to extend past the clamp if a metal box is used but use a non-metallic box and now it must extend 1/4" past the clamp?
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Home Inspector Listings | jbowman | Miscellaneous Discussion for Inspectors | 230 | 3/21/12 9:35 PM |
| National Electrical Code Information and Discussion | jtedesco1 | Electrical Inspections | 50 | 6/15/10 7:28 PM |
| Both panels look like the Service panel? | mthiltgen | Electrical Inspections | 6 | 3/4/09 10:09 PM |
| Zinsco Service Disconnect Panel | pdickerson | Electrical Inspections | 7 | 9/16/06 11:59 AM |
| Bad electrical problem | Pest Guy | Electrical Inspections | 4 | 1/20/06 9:26 PM |