InterNACHI


Go Back   InterNACHI Inspection Forum > Specific Inspection Topics > Electrical Inspections

Notices

Electrical Inspections Contains discussions about electrical systems. This includes receptacles, panels, wiring, etc.

 
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
  #1  
Old 8/16/11, 7:50 PM
Gerald C. Wilcox's Avatar
Gerald C. Wilcox Gerald C. Wilcox is offline
InterNACHI Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Harvey, ND
Posts: 333
Default Romex Insulation in service panel....

I cannot remember what is the maximum of romex insulation allowed in a service panel. I was thinking less than an inch, cannot find anything to support my thinking. A service panel today had 5-7 inches of romex insulation left on the circuits.
Reply With Quote
Need a home inspection in Indiana? Check out InterNACHI's listing of Indiana certified home inspectors. Or, find a home inspector anywhere in the world with our inspection search engine.
  #2  
Old 8/16/11, 7:54 PM
Robert Meier's Avatar
Robert Meier Robert Meier is online now
Active Poster
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 1,252
Please Note: Robert Meier is a non-member guest and is in no way affiliated with InterNACHI or its members.
Default Re: Romex Insulation in service panel....

The NEC has no maximum length that NM cable can enter a panelboard. The closest thing you might find is Electrical equipment shall be installed in a neat and workmanlike manner which is, IMO unenforceable.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 8/16/11, 8:05 PM
Gerald C. Wilcox's Avatar
Gerald C. Wilcox Gerald C. Wilcox is offline
InterNACHI Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Harvey, ND
Posts: 333
Default Re: Romex Insulation in service panel....

Thanks Robert!
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 8/17/11, 9:25 AM
Robert J. OConnor's Avatar
Robert J. OConnor Robert J. OConnor is offline
InterNACHI Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Long Island, NY
Posts: 1,288
Default Re: Romex Insulation in service panel....

IMO excessive cable sheathing inside a panel it's a sign of poor workmanship or Harry Homeowner wiring. Red flags go up when I see that.



Robert O'Connor, PE
Consulting Engineer & Inspector
LIU CW Post Adjunct Professor
NACHI Education Committee
www.reporthost.com/-rjo

I am absolutely amazed sometimes by how much thought goes into doing things wrong ...
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 8/17/11, 10:02 AM
Greg W. Mathias, CCHI Greg W. Mathias, CCHI is offline
InterNACHI Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Lloydminster,Ab
Posts: 658
Default Re: Romex Insulation in service panel....

In all the literature I have read most say no more than one inch



Greg Mathias, CCHI
Journeyman Carpenter
Global Property Inspections
Lloydminster, AB. Canada
(780)205-9912
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 8/17/11, 10:44 AM
Jeffrey R. Pope's Avatar
Jeffrey R. Pope Jeffrey R. Pope is offline
InterNACHI Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Santa Clarita, CA
Posts: 8,057
Default Re: Romex Insulation in service panel....

Quote:
Originally Posted by gmathias1 View Post
In all the literature I have read most say no more than one inch
This is considered "best practice," but there is no requirement that limits the amount.



IF YOUR INSPECTOR IS NOT USING THERMAL IMAGING, YOU'RE NOT GETTING THE WHOLE PICTURE ®
Jeff Pope
JPI Home Inspection Service
Santa Clarita CA
(661) 212-0738
Santa Clarita Home Inspection
http://www.MyInspector.net


Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 8/17/11, 10:46 AM
Greg W. Mathias, CCHI Greg W. Mathias, CCHI is offline
InterNACHI Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Lloydminster,Ab
Posts: 658
Default Re: Romex Insulation in service panel....

Quote:
Originally Posted by jpope View Post
This is considered "best practice," but there is no requirement that limits the amount.
IC good to know. I have been calling it up, maybe I should'nt be.



Greg Mathias, CCHI
Journeyman Carpenter
Global Property Inspections
Lloydminster, AB. Canada
(780)205-9912
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 8/17/11, 12:14 PM
Jim Port Jim Port is offline
Unmoderated Guest
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Maryland
Posts: 805
Please Note: Jim Port is a non-member guest and is in no way affiliated with InterNACHI or its members.
Default Re: Romex Insulation in service panel....

No different in the panel than when it is in the wall. You are however required to have 6" of free conductor inside the box.

BTW, the minimum required by the NEC is 1/4" inside the panel or box.

Last edited by Jim Port; 8/17/11 at 8:35 PM..
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 8/17/11, 7:19 PM
Robert Meier's Avatar
Robert Meier Robert Meier is online now
Active Poster
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 1,252
Please Note: Robert Meier is a non-member guest and is in no way affiliated with InterNACHI or its members.
Default Re: Romex Insulation in service panel....

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jim Port View Post
BTW, the minimum required by the NEC is 1/4" inside the panel or box.
Jim, where are you finding this 1/4" minimum requirement in the NEC for NM cable?
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 8/17/11, 8:36 PM
Jim Port Jim Port is offline
Unmoderated Guest
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Maryland
Posts: 805
Please Note: Jim Port is a non-member guest and is in no way affiliated with InterNACHI or its members.
Default Re: Romex Insulation in service panel....

Quote:
Originally Posted by Robert Meier View Post
Jim, where are you finding this 1/4" minimum requirement in the NEC for NM cable?
That would be 314.17(C) 2002. I don't believe it has moved.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 8/17/11, 9:26 PM
Paul W. Abernathy Paul W. Abernathy is offline
InterNACHI Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Spotsylvania, VA
Posts: 8,072
Send a message via AIM to pabernathy Send a message via MSN to pabernathy Send a message via Skype™ to pabernathy
Default Re: Romex Insulation in service panel....

(C) Nonmetallic Boxes and Conduit Bodies. Nonmetallic
boxes and conduit bodies shall be suitable for the lowest
temperature-rated conductor entering the box. Where nonmetallic
boxes and conduit bodies are used with messengersupported
wiring, open wiring on insulators, or concealed
knob-and-tube wiring, the conductors shall enter the box
through individual holes. Where flexible tubing is used to
enclose the conductors, the tubing shall extend from the last
insulating support to not less than 6 mm (1⁄4 in.) inside the
box and beyond any cable clamp. Where nonmetallicsheathed
cable or multiconductor Type UF cable is used,
the sheath shall extend not less than 6 mm (1⁄4 in.) inside
the box and beyond any cable clamp.
In all instances, all
permitted wiring methods shall be secured to the boxes.


Exception: Where nonmetallic-sheathed cable or multiconductor
Type UF cable is used with single gang boxes
not larger than a nominal size 57 mm × 100 mm (21⁄4 in.
× 4 in.) mounted in walls or ceilings, and where the cable
is fastened within 200 mm (8 in.) of the box measured along
the sheath and where the sheath extends through a cable
knockout not less than 6 mm (1⁄4 in.), securing the cable to
the box shall not be required.
Multiple cable entries shall
be permitted in a single cable knockout opening.



Paul W. Abernathy
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 8/17/11, 9:32 PM
Robert Meier's Avatar
Robert Meier Robert Meier is online now
Active Poster
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 1,252
Please Note: Robert Meier is a non-member guest and is in no way affiliated with InterNACHI or its members.
Default Re: Romex Insulation in service panel....

I'm not seeing how that would apply to NM cables entering a panel.

Quote:
314.17 Conductors Entering Boxes, Conduit Bodies, or Fittings.
Conductors entering boxes, conduit bodies, or fittings shall be protected from abrasion and shall comply with 314.17(A) through (D).
(C) Nonmetallic Boxes and Conduit Bodies. Nonmetallic boxes and conduit bodies shall be suitable for the lowest temperature-rated conductor entering the box. Where nonmetallic boxes and conduit bodies are used with messenger-supported wiring, open wiring on insulators, or concealed knob-and-tube wiring, the conductors shall enter the box through individual holes. Where flexible tubing is used to enclose the conductors, the tubing shall extend from the last insulating support to not less than 6 mm (¼ in.) inside the box and beyond any cable clamp. Where nonmetallic-sheathed cable or multiconductor Type UF cable is used, the sheath shall extend not less than 6 mm (¼ in.) inside the box and beyond any cable clamp. In all instances, all permitted wiring methods shall be secured to the boxes.
Exception: Where nonmetallic-sheathed cable or multiconductor Type UF cable is used with single gang boxes not larger than a nominal size 57 mm × 100 mm (2¼ in. × 4 in.) mounted in walls or ceilings, and where the cable is fastened within 200 mm (8 in.) of the box measured along the sheath and where the sheath extends through a cable knockout not less than 6 mm (¼ in.), securing the cable to the box shall not be required. Multiple cable entries shall be permitted in a single cable knockout opening.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 8/17/11, 9:45 PM
Jim Port Jim Port is offline
Unmoderated Guest
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Maryland
Posts: 805
Please Note: Jim Port is a non-member guest and is in no way affiliated with InterNACHI or its members.
Default Re: Romex Insulation in service panel....

Cable clamps would be used as the cable enters the box and I would consider the enclosure a box also.
Reply With Quote
Need a home inspection in Indiana? Check out InterNACHI's listing of Indiana certified home inspectors. Or, find a home inspector anywhere in the world with our inspection search engine.
  #14  
Old 8/18/11, 7:07 AM
Robert Meier's Avatar
Robert Meier Robert Meier is online now
Active Poster
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 1,252
Please Note: Robert Meier is a non-member guest and is in no way affiliated with InterNACHI or its members.
Default Re: Romex Insulation in service panel....

314.17(C) is only for Nonmetallic Boxes and Conduit Bodies.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 8/18/11, 8:47 AM
Jim Port Jim Port is offline
Unmoderated Guest
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Maryland
Posts: 805
Please Note: Jim Port is a non-member guest and is in no way affiliated with InterNACHI or its members.
Default Re: Romex Insulation in service panel....

Quote:
Originally Posted by Robert Meier View Post
314.17(C) is only for Nonmetallic Boxes and Conduit Bodies.
I see your point about this only stating NM boxes. I don't see why it would not apply to metallic boxes or where cable clamps are used on metallic boxes, but don't know if I could find words to support it. 314.17(B) leaves out NM-B when talking about metallic boxes. IMO the same requirements should apply even tho it is not specified. After all why would it be allowable for the sheath not need to extend past the clamp if a metal box is used but use a non-metallic box and now it must extend 1/4" past the clamp?
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Home Inspector Listings jbowman Miscellaneous Discussion for Inspectors 230 3/21/12 9:35 PM
National Electrical Code Information and Discussion jtedesco1 Electrical Inspections 50 6/15/10 7:28 PM
Both panels look like the Service panel? mthiltgen Electrical Inspections 6 3/4/09 10:09 PM
Zinsco Service Disconnect Panel pdickerson Electrical Inspections 7 9/16/06 11:59 AM
Bad electrical problem Pest Guy Electrical Inspections 4 1/20/06 9:26 PM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 9:27 AM.


Popular Sections

:

All Sections

Inspection News

InterNACHI Membership

Inspection Standards

Inspection Education

InterNACHI Inspectors

Inspection Links

 

 

 

NACHI.ORG Statistics

 

 

no new posts