InterNACHI


Go Back   InterNACHI Inspection Forum > Specific Inspection Topics > Electrical Inspections

Notices

Electrical Inspections Contains discussions about electrical systems. This includes receptacles, panels, wiring, etc.

 
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
  #1  
Old 9/2/09, 12:57 PM
pdickerson pdickerson is offline
InterNACHI Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Clinton, WA
Posts: 341
Default Sub-panel in detached building

This panel is in a detached building. It has a 3-wire feed, and the neutrals and grounds are separated. The panel has a GEC to a UFER ground. The neutral bus is not bonded to the enclosure. The panel looks very professional and tidy (except for the missing ground wire of course).

I haven't seen a 3 wire sub-panel with grounds and neutrals separated for a while, and I had to sketch it out to remember just why this is dangerous. Under normal condtions, everything works just fine, but in the event of a ground fault, the fault current returns to the ground bus in the sub-panel and then has no low impedance path back to the transformer. I believe the only fix is to pull a ground wire to the panel because 3 wire sub-panels are no longer allowed in detached buildings. Am I remembering this correctly?

Of course I don't go into any of the details in the report. I just note that it is wrong and call for an electrician to fix it.
Attached Thumbnails
sub-panel-detached-building-p1160246.jpg   sub-panel-detached-building-p1160247.jpg   sub-panel-detached-building-p1160249.jpg  
Reply With Quote
Find an InterNACHI certified New York Home Inspector (and anywhere else in North America)
  #2  
Old 9/2/09, 5:16 PM
Jeffrey R. Wicklander's Avatar
Jeffrey R. Wicklander Jeffrey R. Wicklander is offline
InterNACHI Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Lake Forest, Il
Posts: 1,223
Default Re: Sub-panel in detached building

Is the pipe that is feeding the detached building a continuous length of EMT or rigid? (not rigid to PVC)

Jeff



Jeff Wicklander
Corwick Home Services

Join my business on Facebook
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 9/2/09, 5:35 PM
Paul W. Abernathy Paul W. Abernathy is offline
InterNACHI Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Spotsylvania, VA
Posts: 8,072
Send a message via AIM to pabernathy Send a message via MSN to pabernathy Send a message via Skype™ to pabernathy
Default Re: Sub-panel in detached building

Ok, Let me explain a few things for you.

1.) if the building is existing and their are no metallic paths ( ie: phone line, metal water line, etc. ) between the two buildings then a 3 wire circuit is still allowed to a detached structure. Under the 2008 NEC it is still allowed if it is existing but the allowance for 3 wire has been removed in 2008...again except for existing applications.

2.) The grounded and grounding conductors must be connected together in this type of setup so they need a bonding jumper to connect them together and then a connection to the panel enclosure. The "grounded" conductor and "grounding" conductor both should be connected to the GEC in this application via the bussbars you have mentioned.

You are correct in that the return low impedance path is needed and in the 3 wire situation the "grounded" conductor is serving both functions....this is not typically a good thing and why ranges and dryers had it changed years ago....it is just a case of the detached structure catching up with those type changes.

Now as to being something you write up if you see a 3 wire setup that is allowed based on the minimum safety standards is a call you will have to make. Their is a reason why they no longer allow it so that can be your guide. However, be aware it will cause a combative nature from electricians who you defer to...so as long as you are ok with that....fine. But, in your case it is not just about the 3 wire setup. Your case is a situation where they dont have the bonds properly done as I stated before and they should at the least be corrected.

FYI- I would however ask if they have a "Back-Fed" hold down breaker device and since you are calling the other things out, get them to re-identiy the white conductors on the breakers. Also see what you can about the conduit that may be from one building to the other....but remember it could also be plastic and bushings would still be required in this case for abrasion so don't assume it is metal conduit that is continuous between buildings.



Paul W. Abernathy

Last edited by pabernathy; 9/2/09 at 5:38 PM..
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 9/6/09, 11:07 AM
David P. OKeefe's Avatar
David P. OKeefe David P. OKeefe is offline
InterNACHI Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Delmar,, NY
Posts: 974
Default Re: Sub-panel in detached building

Paul, I want to be sure I got this right. In a 3 wire system, as we have here, the grounding and grounded wires must be bonded together. In a 4 wire system, the two wires must be separate and the grounded(white) wires must be floating.
The set up in this detached building is incorrect not because of the 3 wire feed but because the grounded and grounding wires are separate and not bonded. To correct this, you can ether run a forth wire (grounding) to the panel or bond the wires together. Is this correct?



David

InterNACHI #08051301
NYS Lic. #16000038229
NYS DEC Cert # T4865884
518-505-8305
HouseAbout Home Inspections
HouseAbout on Facebook
NY Capital Region Chapter InterNACHI


Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 9/6/09, 6:28 PM
Paul W. Abernathy Paul W. Abernathy is offline
InterNACHI Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Spotsylvania, VA
Posts: 8,072
Send a message via AIM to pabernathy Send a message via MSN to pabernathy Send a message via Skype™ to pabernathy
Default Re: Sub-panel in detached building

David,

You are correct. However, running the "4th" conductor could present a problem in regards to running all the conductors together so if it is a 3 wire set up and their is no metallic path between the two structures. Install a bonding jumper, install a GES and call it day.( Under the 2005 NEC, 2008 NEC will not allow the 3 wire option except if it is already existing )



Paul W. Abernathy
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 9/6/09, 10:38 PM
David P. OKeefe's Avatar
David P. OKeefe David P. OKeefe is offline
InterNACHI Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Delmar,, NY
Posts: 974
Default Re: Sub-panel in detached building

Thank you.



David

InterNACHI #08051301
NYS Lic. #16000038229
NYS DEC Cert # T4865884
518-505-8305
HouseAbout Home Inspections
HouseAbout on Facebook
NY Capital Region Chapter InterNACHI


Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 9/8/09, 8:40 AM
Tim C. Howell Tim C. Howell is offline
InterNACHI Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: New Liberty, IA
Posts: 85
Default Re: Sub-panel in detached building

Quote:
Originally Posted by pabernathy View Post
Ok, Let me explain a few things for you.

1.) if the building is existing and their are no metallic paths ( ie: phone line, metal water line, etc. ) between the two buildings then a 3 wire circuit is still allowed to a detached structure. Under the 2008 NEC it is still allowed if it is existing but the allowance for 3 wire has been removed in 2008...again except for existing applications.

2.) The grounded and grounding conductors must be connected together in this type of setup so they need a bonding jumper to connect them together and then a connection to the panel enclosure. The "grounded" conductor and "grounding" conductor both should be connected to the GEC in this application via the bussbars you have mentioned.

You are correct in that the return low impedance path is needed and in the 3 wire situation the "grounded" conductor is serving both functions....this is not typically a good thing and why ranges and dryers had it changed years ago....it is just a case of the detached structure catching up with those type changes.

Now as to being something you write up if you see a 3 wire setup that is allowed based on the minimum safety standards is a call you will have to make. Their is a reason why they no longer allow it so that can be your guide. However, be aware it will cause a combative nature from electricians who you defer to...so as long as you are ok with that....fine. But, in your case it is not just about the 3 wire setup. Your case is a situation where they dont have the bonds properly done as I stated before and they should at the least be corrected.

FYI- I would however ask if they have a "Back-Fed" hold down breaker device and since you are calling the other things out, get them to re-identiy the white conductors on the breakers. Also see what you can about the conduit that may be from one building to the other....but remember it could also be plastic and bushings would still be required in this case for abrasion so don't assume it is metal conduit that is continuous between buildings.
Paul, I thought the sub panel grounds and neutrals had to be separated??
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 9/8/09, 10:27 AM
Jim Port Jim Port is offline
Unmoderated Guest
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Maryland
Posts: 805
Please Note: Jim Port is a non-member guest and is in no way affiliated with InterNACHI or its members.
Default Re: Sub-panel in detached building

The OP said there was only a 3 wire feed. With no other metallic paths back to the other building under codes prior to the 08 it was acceptable to re-bond at a detached building.

The 08 has removed that option and requires a 4 wire feed. In this case the neutrals and grounds are separate.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 9/9/09, 9:31 PM
Paul W. Abernathy Paul W. Abernathy is offline
InterNACHI Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Spotsylvania, VA
Posts: 8,072
Send a message via AIM to pabernathy Send a message via MSN to pabernathy Send a message via Skype™ to pabernathy
Default Re: Sub-panel in detached building

Quote:
Originally Posted by thowell View Post
Paul, I thought the sub panel grounds and neutrals had to be separated??
Not if it complies with 250.32 and their is no metallic path between the two buildings. You would treat the panel in the detached structure the same as you would a typical panel. You have to understand the two differences....As jim said......prior to the 2008 NEC is was allowed but is not any longer in new construction.

Below is the 2008 Verbiage ( minus the exception for existing detached structures )

(B) Grounded Systems.
For a grounded system at the
separate building or structure, an equipment grounding conductor
as described in 250.118 shall be run with the supply
conductors and be connected to the building or structure
disconnecting means and to the grounding electrode(s). The
equipment grounding conductor shall be used for grounding
or bonding of equipment, structures, or frames required
to be grounded or bonded. The equipment grounding
conductor shall be sized in accordance with 250.122.
Any installed grounded conductor shall not be connected
to the equipment grounding conductor or to the grounding
electrode(s).

Ok......so read the above as it pertains to the NEW requirement of 250.32 and below is the exception.

Exception: For existing premises wiring systems only, the
grounded conductor run with the supply to the building or
structure shall be permitted to be connected to the building
or structure disconnecting means and to the grounding
electrode(s) and shall be used for grounding or bonding of
equipment, structures, or frames required to be grounded
or bonded where all the requirements of (1), (2), and (3)
are met:

(1) An equipment grounding conductor is not run with the
supply to the building or structure.
(2) There are no continuous metallic paths bonded to the
grounding system in each building or structure involved.
(3) Ground-fault protection of equipment has not been installed
on the supply side of the feeder(s).

Where the grounded conductor is used for grounding in
accordance with the provision of this exception, the size of
the grounded conductor shall not be smaller than the larger
of either of the following:

(1) That required by 220.61
(2) That required by 250.122

How this helps you understand a little better.



Paul W. Abernathy
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 9/10/09, 8:53 AM
Tim C. Howell Tim C. Howell is offline
InterNACHI Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: New Liberty, IA
Posts: 85
Default Re: Sub-panel in detached building

So Paul,
In a detached garage with a phone and 3 wire srevice, the ground bar and neutral is separated, there is a grouding rod for the garage. The neutral and ground do not need to be separated from what I understand now, but in this case they are. Is this a safety issue?
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 9/10/09, 11:03 PM
Brian E. Kelly's Avatar
Brian E. Kelly Brian E. Kelly is offline
InterNACHI Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 15,973
Default Re: Sub-panel in detached building

Todays sub panel
Attached Thumbnails
sub-panel-detached-building-114451-e-charter-oak-9-10-09-024.jpg  
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 9/11/09, 9:09 AM
Jim Port Jim Port is offline
Unmoderated Guest
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Maryland
Posts: 805
Please Note: Jim Port is a non-member guest and is in no way affiliated with InterNACHI or its members.
Default Re: Sub-panel in detached building

Tim,

In the situation you posted a 3 wire feed would not have been a compliant install since you had another metallic path, (phone line), back to the other building.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 9/13/09, 9:25 AM
Paul W. Abernathy Paul W. Abernathy is offline
InterNACHI Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Spotsylvania, VA
Posts: 8,072
Send a message via AIM to pabernathy Send a message via MSN to pabernathy Send a message via Skype™ to pabernathy
Default Re: Sub-panel in detached building

Quote:
Originally Posted by thowell View Post
So Paul,
In a detached garage with a phone and 3 wire srevice, the ground bar and neutral is separated, there is a grouding rod for the garage. The neutral and ground do not need to be separated from what I understand now, but in this case they are. Is this a safety issue?
as Jim stated....the flaw in your question or situation is the phone line between the buildings. It is indeed a metallic path ( unless it is fiber optics..lol ) so a 3 wire setup is not allowed if the metallic paths exist. And in fact it is not allowed ANYTIME in new construction if your area accepts the 2008 NEC.



Paul W. Abernathy
Reply With Quote
Find an InterNACHI certified New York Home Inspector (and anywhere else in North America)
  #14  
Old 9/15/09, 8:02 AM
Tim C. Howell Tim C. Howell is offline
InterNACHI Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: New Liberty, IA
Posts: 85
Default Re: Sub-panel in detached building

Quote:
Originally Posted by pabernathy View Post
as Jim stated....the flaw in your question or situation is the phone line between the buildings. It is indeed a metallic path ( unless it is fiber optics..lol ) so a 3 wire setup is not allowed if the metallic paths exist. And in fact it is not allowed ANYTIME in new construction if your area accepts the 2008 NEC.

This is an existing garage remodel Guys. JUst wanted to make sure there were not any dangers. Thanks for the responces on this. Have a great day.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Mold mcyr IAC2 Indoor Air Forum 5 9/13/10 10:31 AM
Detached Building Sub Panel dmacy Electrical Inspections 16 8/12/09 7:48 PM
PIC of State Rep and sponsor of new NACHI H.I. Bill in NH. gromicko Miscellaneous Discussion for Inspectors 53 8/30/06 5:58 PM
Bad electrical problem Pest Guy Electrical Inspections 4 1/20/06 9:26 PM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 8:37 AM.


Popular Sections

:

All Sections

Inspection News

InterNACHI Membership

Inspection Standards

Inspection Education

InterNACHI Inspectors

Inspection Links

 

 

 

NACHI.ORG Statistics

 

 

no new posts