InterNACHI


Go Back   InterNACHI Inspection Forum > Specific Inspection Topics > Electrical Inspections

Notices

Electrical Inspections Contains discussions about electrical systems. This includes receptacles, panels, wiring, etc.

 
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
  #1  
Old 6/22/08, 12:56 PM
mnicholet's Avatar
mnicholet mnicholet is offline
Active Poster
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Vancouver Island, BC
Posts: 543
Please Note: mnicholet is a non-member guest and is in no way affiliated with InterNACHI or its members.
Default UFER tail

Does this look like a UFER tail? It is coming out of the slab. My concern is it appears it may be going to a UFER and is disconnected. Thank you.
Attached Thumbnails
ufer-tail-vancouver-138-small-.jpg.jpg
Views:	119
Size:	49.9 KB
ID:	22144  
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 6/22/08, 2:04 PM
Jeffrey R. Pope's Avatar
Jeffrey R. Pope Jeffrey R. Pope is offline
InterNACHI Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Santa Clarita, CA
Posts: 8,047
Default Re: UFER tail

It's very possible that you're looking at the GEC, but it would be impossible to say for certain with just this picture.



IF YOUR INSPECTOR IS NOT USING THERMAL IMAGING, YOU'RE NOT GETTING THE WHOLE PICTURE ®
Jeff Pope
JPI Home Inspection Service
Santa Clarita CA
(661) 212-0738
Santa Clarita Home Inspection
http://www.MyInspector.net


Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 6/22/08, 2:20 PM
Peter Doane's Avatar
Peter Doane Peter Doane is offline
InterNACHI Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Olympia, WA
Posts: 2,055
Default Re: UFER tail

I agree with Jeff,
Usually, around here at least, all signs of a UFER ground is hidden from view. Its usually attached to the foundation rebar prior to the pour.



Peter Doane
Realty Check Inspection Service
NACHI ID# 05120681
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 6/22/08, 2:36 PM
cbuell's Avatar
cbuell cbuell is offline
Active Poster
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Shorline, WA
Posts: 380
Please Note: cbuell is a non-member guest and is in no way affiliated with InterNACHI or its members.
Default Re: UFER tail

In the Seattle are the ufer connections has to be assessible. I usually find it behind a blank cover plate under the electric panel.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 6/22/08, 3:24 PM
Jeffrey R. Pope's Avatar
Jeffrey R. Pope Jeffrey R. Pope is offline
InterNACHI Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Santa Clarita, CA
Posts: 8,047
Default Re: UFER tail

Quote:
Originally Posted by cbuell
In the Seattle are the ufer connections has to be assessible. I usually find it behind a blank cover plate under the electric panel.
That's pretty typical for residential applications - an accessible clamp to rebar.

A cadweld is not required to be accessible.



IF YOUR INSPECTOR IS NOT USING THERMAL IMAGING, YOU'RE NOT GETTING THE WHOLE PICTURE ®
Jeff Pope
JPI Home Inspection Service
Santa Clarita CA
(661) 212-0738
Santa Clarita Home Inspection
http://www.MyInspector.net


Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 6/22/08, 8:16 PM
Jim Port Jim Port is offline
Unmoderated Guest
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Maryland
Posts: 805
Please Note: Jim Port is a non-member guest and is in no way affiliated with InterNACHI or its members.
Default Re: UFER tail

Does this look like a copper conductor? Is it the size of #4 Copper?

If not it cannot be part of the ufer ground. If you could verify that this was rebars it might be part of the ufer.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 6/27/08, 9:04 PM
Paul W. Abernathy Paul W. Abernathy is offline
InterNACHI Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Spotsylvania, VA
Posts: 8,072
Send a message via AIM to pabernathy Send a message via MSN to pabernathy Send a message via Skype™ to pabernathy
Default Re: UFER tail

Just some FYI as not always does the connection need to be accessible....

250.68 Grounding Electrode Conductor and Bonding
Jumper Connection to Grounding Electrodes.
(A) Accessibility.
All mechanical elements used to terminate
a grounding electrode conductor or bonding jumper to
a grounding electrode shall be accessible.

Exception No. 1: An encased or buried connection to a
concrete-encased, driven, or buried grounding electrode
shall not be required to be accessible.



Paul W. Abernathy
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 5:01 AM.


Popular Sections

:

All Sections

Inspection News

InterNACHI Membership

Inspection Standards

Inspection Education

InterNACHI Inspectors

Inspection Links

 

 

 

NACHI.ORG Statistics

 

 

no new posts