InterNACHI


Go Back   InterNACHI Message Board > Specific Inspection Topics > Ancillary Services & Additional Topics

Notices

Ancillary Services & Additional Topics Contains discussions about Radon, Wood Infestation, Water Quality, Well, Septic, Lead, Asbestos, Pool, and Mold inspections.

View Poll Results: What would you do
Charge the seller 1 4.00%
Retest for free 13 52.00%
Charge for retest 7 28.00%
Just send the report as is & forget about it 4 16.00%
Voters: 25. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
  #1  
Old 10/31/06, 11:35 AM
David C. Macy's Avatar
David C. Macy David C. Macy is offline
InterNACHI Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Broadview Hts., OH
Posts: 1,465
Default Radon Addendum

I recently performed a radon test & was sent an addendum due to variances in the humidity. The reason was that heavy storms and high winds where prevelent while the test was running.

The levels where around 3.0 & then dropped to less then 1.0

So, know I need to re-test.

The seller isnt responsable as he didnt violate the protocal, The buyer shouldnt have to pay for another test.

I use radalink and there is a $25 dollar per fee per test.

Fortunetly the buyer doesnt need right away for real estate purpose or mitigation.

I also have a Sun Nuclear monitor & I decided I would test when she moves in. Probably in December.

So it wll cost me about 2 hours drive time & gas.

Wanted to ask how others would handle this scenerio.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 10/31/06, 1:16 PM
Andrew Rook Andrew Rook is offline
InterNACHI Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Hamilton, NJ
Posts: 202
Default Re: Radon Addendum

I would retest it on my dime.

If you have some time to play with, try to schedule the test when you are going to be in the area. If you don't go to the area too often, consider contacting another inspector that is near the house and see if they will conduct a test for a nominal fee as a favor to you.

Either way, the buyer will be appreciative and it may come back ten-fold and if it doesn't you still did the right thing.

What would you expect if you were the buyer?

Food for thought.

Andrew Rook
Rook Home Inspections LLC
www.rookinspections.com
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 10/31/06, 1:23 PM
Nick Gromicko's Avatar
Nick Gromicko Nick Gromicko is offline
InterNACHI Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Valley Forge, PA
Posts: 19,588
Default Re: Radon Addendum

That is one of the problems with radon testing: http://www.nachi.org/dear_nachi3.htm



Nick Gromicko, CMI
Founder
World's biggest, best inspection association
"Planet InterNACHI... resistance is futile"
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 11/4/06, 8:42 AM
John Lerch John Lerch is offline
InterNACHI Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Jonesborough, TN
Posts: 327
Default Re: Radon Addendum

Hey David... I watch the weather forecast and explain to clients when the test time needs to be adjusted due to adverse conditions. I'll schedule to start radon test prior to or at the end of the home inspection to accommodate. In some cases the contingency time was extended to ensure an accurate result. If needed to schedule outside the home inspection time frame I charge the additional $'s for added travel.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 11/5/06, 1:38 AM
Kenton H. Shepard, CMI's Avatar
Kenton H. Shepard, CMI Kenton H. Shepard, CMI is offline
InterNACHI Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Boulder, CO
Posts: 2,487
Send a message via ICQ to kshepard
Default Re: Radon Addendum

I don't understand the problem, Dave. I don't pick optimum weather conditions during which to test, I just set the monitor. The weather changes all year long. If they want a more accurate reflection of the annual radon levels in the home, they need to do a long-term test.

I can see how a storm might effect air pressure, which might effect the amound of radon gas coming out of the earth, but how does humidy effect the results (I use the Sun Nuclear)?




Kenton Shepard, InterNACHI member # 04082383
Certified Master Inspector (CMI)
EXPERT WITNESS

Director of Green Building
Director for International Development

(303) 717-8940
(303) 258-8289

Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 2/27/07, 7:54 PM
David A. Andersen's Avatar
David A. Andersen David A. Andersen is offline
InterNACHI Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Woodlawn, TN
Posts: 3,697
Default Re: Radon Addendum

Has anyone read the EPA protocol?

Retesting is only required if he reading is above 4.0 pCi/l.

If the client wants retesting done, then they can pay for it. I don't drive two hours, exhaust radon testing equipment and donate my time because the weather was not suitable for testing.

High winds, low temperatures, frozen ground, snow elevate radon levels. Seeing as your results was 3.0 pCi/l, additional testing will only go down.

So if the client wants a better test, first (as posted ) a long-term test should be conducted outside of the real estate transaction of 48 hours.

I got into this retesting thing where someone wanted me to retest, retest and retest until the level came down below 4.0. Well, guess what? They all have to be averaged together and one low reading will not out average all the other high readings.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 3/22/07, 12:23 PM
Bernie Katz Bernie Katz is offline
New User
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 10
Please Note: Bernie Katz is a non-member guest and is in no way affiliated with InterNACHI or its members.
Default Re: Radon Addendum

I have been teaching Radon Testing for 4 years now for ESA and I thought I should give you a direct quote from the EPA's Indoor Radon and Radon Decay Product Measurement Device Protocols. This states nothing about what your count was when you aborted the test - these counts are not the parameters. Here is the quote
"Short-term tests lasting just two or three days should not be conducted if severe storms with high winds (e.g., > 30 mph) or rapidly changing barometric pressure are predicted during the measurement period. Weather predictions available on local news stations can provide sufficient information to determine if these conditions are likely. "

Hope this helps.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Final review of Newman's radon references! Caoimhín P. Connell Ancillary Services & Additional Topics 12 10/4/08 1:23 PM
Anti-radon modifications inspired by Rochester man's ordeal gromicko IAC2 Forum 2 5/22/07 4:33 PM
As promised - Review of Newman's second radon study Caoimhín P. Connell Ancillary Services & Additional Topics 2 1/26/07 9:05 PM
As promised - Review of Newman's first radon study Caoimhín P. Connell Ancillary Services & Additional Topics 7 1/24/07 1:21 PM
FL HI's who offer but don't perform radon testing should list cert #'s on website. gromicko Legislation, Licensing & Legal Issues 1 7/10/06 11:01 AM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 2:58 AM.


Copyright © International Association of Certified Home Inspectors, Inc. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147

Popular Sections

:

All Sections

Popular

Membership

Inspection Standards

Education

Chapters & Members

Articles & Links

Other Organizations

 

 

 

NACHI.ORG Statistics

 

 

no new posts