InterNACHI


Go Back   InterNACHI Inspection Forum > Specific Inspection Topics > Structural Inspections

Notices

Structural Inspections Contains discussions about the structural portion of a home inspection. This includes foundations, framing, etc.

 
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
  #1  
Old 10/9/07, 5:57 PM
Robert E. Young, #4 Robert E. Young, #4 is offline
New User
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Crowley, Texas
Posts: 2
Please Note: Robert E. Young, #4 is a non-member guest and is in no way affiliated with InterNACHI or its members.
Angry 94+ code violations and a Builders denial in Texas

Hi!

Posted about 6+ months ago when I only had 94 State code violations ... can link you to them on another site if you like. Lots of Structural issues that I believe are due to a flexing foundation that ALMOST is out of code itself. Slab is post-tension, 54' x 40', and last measure w/Compu-Level put one portion at 1.6" above center of home. I have edge-lift front and back, stair-stepped crack on exterior, 5 of 13 interior doors either won't shut at all or won't latch once shut. Going thru "SIRP" process, towards the end and the Lawyer that LENNAR/NuHome has hired is denying a LOT. I have no reason to believe (9 others in this new addition with similar problems, others we haven't heard from yet as well) that the Builder will stand behind their product at this point.
My current question:

Engineer that designed the slab stated on printout:

PVR + 1-4" Plasticity index is 50 ("Q" at 5000)??

I know that plasticity index is mega huge, the slab is approved via plan to be 4" thick with perimeter 24" deep. This is not a pier/beam but a post-tension. I can see the sag in my exterior brick courses on the east and west walls, etc.

Does that slab sound like it is properly engineered (4"??) for this type soil?

Help!

Robert Young
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 10/9/07, 6:44 PM
Larry D. Kage Larry D. Kage is offline
InterNACHI Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Lake Ann (Traverse City), MI
Posts: 8,847
Default Re: 94+ code violations and a Builders denial in Texas

Quote:
Originally Posted by Robert E. Young, #4
Hi!

Posted about 6+ months ago when I only had 94 State code violations ... can link you to them on another site if you like. Lots of Structural issues that I believe are due to a flexing foundation that ALMOST is out of code itself. Slab is post-tension, 54' x 40', and last measure w/Compu-Level put one portion at 1.6" above center of home. I have edge-lift front and back, stair-stepped crack on exterior, 5 of 13 interior doors either won't shut at all or won't latch once shut. Going thru "SIRP" process, towards the end and the Lawyer that LENNAR/NuHome has hired is denying a LOT. I have no reason to believe (9 others in this new addition with similar problems, others we haven't heard from yet as well) that the Builder will stand behind their product at this point.
My current question:

Engineer that designed the slab stated on printout:

PVR + 1-4" Plasticity index is 50 ("Q" at 5000)??

I know that plasticity index is mega huge, the slab is approved via plan to be 4" thick with perimeter 24" deep. This is not a pier/beam but a post-tension. I can see the sag in my exterior brick courses on the east and west walls, etc.

Does that slab sound like it is properly engineered (4"??) for this type soil?

Help!

Robert Young
Sorry you're having problems. It sounds like having your engineer do an on site analysis would be helpful...it's pretty hard to see all the conditions from here.



InterNachi Awards Portal: http://co.nachi.org/inachiawards/

____________________________________________
"An Education, not just an Inspection"

Larry Kage, CMI
Lake Ann (Traverse City), Michigan 49650
231 929 3525


Professional Inspector serving the Traverse City, Michigan area and beyond.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 10/9/07, 7:12 PM
Barry Adair's Avatar
Barry Adair Barry Adair is offline
InterNACHI Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: TEXAS
Posts: 3,932
Default Re: 94+ code violations and a Builders denial in Texas

Robert,

I'll take you up on that link, always interested in construction defects from our region.



ADAIR INSPECTION
972-487-5634

Commercial-Residential-Construction-EIFS-Infrared Thermography
TREC # 4563
EDI: EIFS-MA TX # 39

2008 US Member of the Year

life is the random lottery of events followed by numerous narrow escapes accept the good
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 10/9/07, 7:41 PM
Robert E. Young, #4 Robert E. Young, #4 is offline
New User
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Crowley, Texas
Posts: 2
Please Note: Robert E. Young, #4 is a non-member guest and is in no way affiliated with InterNACHI or its members.
Default Re: 94+ code violations and a Builders denial in Texas

Interesting ... in the last few months LENNAR has taken posession of the website!! Wonder why ... http://www.defective-homes.net is now a LENNAR site but I will search out my past print-outs with some of our neighborhoods' homeowners' complaints that have resulted in SIRP process ongoing.
Anyway, is it not unusual to only have a 4" thick slab when your ground PVR is 1"-4"? Any similar experiences out there? What does PVR stand for?

Another group of homeowners with LENNAR issues: http://www.searchhutto.com/huttoparke/index.html & http://www.searchhutto.com/huttoparke/stories.html

I am NOT trying to pick on LENNAR, but in the same fashion I need help to defend my spending over $100,000.00 for a defective home ...

Robert
Robert
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 10/10/07, 9:17 PM
Barry Adair's Avatar
Barry Adair Barry Adair is offline
InterNACHI Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: TEXAS
Posts: 3,932
Default Re: 94+ code violations and a Builders denial in Texas

Robert,

Everything is for sale in America, even websites for the right price

PVR (potential vertical rise) the potential of soil uplift



ADAIR INSPECTION
972-487-5634

Commercial-Residential-Construction-EIFS-Infrared Thermography
TREC # 4563
EDI: EIFS-MA TX # 39

2008 US Member of the Year

life is the random lottery of events followed by numerous narrow escapes accept the good
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 10/11/07, 6:59 AM
Barry Adair's Avatar
Barry Adair Barry Adair is offline
InterNACHI Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: TEXAS
Posts: 3,932
Default Re: 94+ code violations and a Builders denial in Texas

Quote:
Originally Posted by badair
Robert,

I'll take you up on that link, always interested in construction defects from our region.
Hey folks I got red tagged for this post, how funny

94+ code violations and...10/9/07 6:47 PM



ADAIR INSPECTION
972-487-5634

Commercial-Residential-Construction-EIFS-Infrared Thermography
TREC # 4563
EDI: EIFS-MA TX # 39

2008 US Member of the Year

life is the random lottery of events followed by numerous narrow escapes accept the good
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 10/11/07, 7:48 AM
Jason A. Sieg, CMI's Avatar
Jason A. Sieg, CMI Jason A. Sieg, CMI is offline
InterNACHI Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Davison, MI
Posts: 839
Default Re: 94+ code violations and a Builders denial in Texas

Quote:
Originally Posted by Robert E. Young, #4
Interesting ... in the last few months LENNAR has taken posession of the website!! Wonder why ... http://www.defective-homes.net is now a LENNAR site but I will search out my past print-outs with some of our neighborhoods' homeowners' complaints that have resulted in SIRP process ongoing.

Robert
Robert
Try using the Internet "Wayback Machine"!
Here are the only two results I found:
http://web.archive.org/web/200705170...ive-homes.net/
http://web.archive.org/web/200705181...ive-homes.net/



Jason Sieg, CMI
Davison, MI
NACHI05091399


Knowing the current condition,
to make a wise decision.

President, Great Lakes-East Chapter
Join NACHI Great Lakes - East Chapter

http://mi.nachi.org/greatlakes-east/about.html
ssieg@gfn.org
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 10/12/07, 11:44 AM
Mel Young Mel Young is offline
New User
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Crowley, Texas
Posts: 2
Please Note: Mel Young is a non-member guest and is in no way affiliated with InterNACHI or its members.
Default Re: 94+ code violations and a Builders denial in Texas

Those are IT! Kool "wayback" machine, Mr. Sherman ... ooops.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 10/13/07, 2:15 PM
lfoster's Avatar
lfoster lfoster is offline
Active Poster
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Utopia, TX
Posts: 489
Please Note: lfoster is a non-member guest and is in no way affiliated with InterNACHI or its members.
Default Re: 94+ code violations and a Builders denial in Texas

There has to be something that can be done. May need support, attorney, etc. from nearest large town.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 10/14/07, 6:24 AM
jgroves jgroves is offline
Active Poster
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Douglasville, GA
Posts: 207
Send a message via AIM to jgroves
Please Note: jgroves is a non-member guest and is in no way affiliated with InterNACHI or its members.
Default Re: 94+ code violations and a Builders denial in Texas

From Lennar's efforts to silence dissent, rather than address the real problem, I feel that you need to organize the other home owners and do something that I personally abhor and file a class action lawsuit. The fact that they have somehow managed to gain control of the website that was airing their poor building practices (most likely through the courts), and after a quick web search for complaints against TRCC, the courts seem to be your only truly viable option now. You should also get your local media involved. If you have ever heard of Clark Howard here in Atlanta, he is a consumer advocate with a nationally syndicated radio program. Contact him at http://www.clarkhoward.com. Clark is merciless with this type of misconduct. Ask Bank of America and Capitol One about their misdeeds and how his constant pressure brought about reforms.

None of us can answer your question about the slab accurately without knowing what type of soil classification you have, etc, but a 4" slab for a 2160 sq ft footprint does sound like someone was trying to cut some corners and save on costs. Your best bet is to have a geotechnical engineer examine the foundation. It could be poor concrete design, too much water added to the concrete on site, etc. The only way to answer the question is a detailed engineering analysis.

Last edited by jgroves; 10/14/07 at 6:28 AM..
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 10/14/07, 4:37 PM
Emmanuel J. Scanlan Emmanuel J. Scanlan is offline
InterNACHI Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Josephine, TX
Posts: 1,036
Default Re: 94+ code violations and a Builders denial in Texas

Robert,

The minimum slab thickness of a post tension foundation is 4". We can certainly debate many aspects but it would still come down to the fact that an engineer did design, certify and place their stamp on the foundation plan. Unless we have a licensed structural engineer on the forum willing to provide you a definitive answer then I would advise that you find a very good structural engineer and have them review the home plans. You will of course need to find one willing to provide expert testimony when that time comes.

If you are interested in the actual engineering design criterion, including all of the extensive formulas, you can view them at The Post Tension Institutes WEB site: http://www.post-tensioning.org/docum...onMay07web.pdf .

As always the NACHI membership is always willing to help in any way we can so continue to ask questions and by all means let us know how it progresses.

Good luck in your situation!



Knowledge is power, but sharing knowledge brings peace!

http://www.psinspection.com

TREC License# 7593

Professional Real Estate Inspections for the counties of Collin, Rockwall, Hunt, Dallas, Tarrant, Kaufman and all surrounding areas. If you want the the best you will find it with PS Inspection & Property Services LLC!
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 10/15/07, 8:48 AM
jgroves jgroves is offline
Active Poster
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Douglasville, GA
Posts: 207
Send a message via AIM to jgroves
Please Note: jgroves is a non-member guest and is in no way affiliated with InterNACHI or its members.
Default Re: 94+ code violations and a Builders denial in Texas

Quote:
Originally Posted by badair
Hey folks I got red tagged for this post, how funny

94+ code violations and...10/9/07 6:47 PM
Barry, apparently the same coward tagged me as well. Hey, Chicken$h_t, voice your opinion like a man or woman, don't hide behind an anonymous red box. If you find fault in my opinion, challenge it like an adult, not a 6 year old. There are many reasons why concrete fails, not just design, and as Mr Scanlan pointed out, 4" is the minimum. We don't know the soil classification, to what standard the concrete was designed, etc. Just because I haven't elucidated ALL my arguments doesn't mean I don't know what I'm doing. This isn't a college exercise with a professor who is in love with the Socratic method. This is supposed to be all of us helping each other and voicing our opinions. If you only want to read your favorite's opinion, then use the ignore feature.
</IMG></IMG></IMG>
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 10/15/07, 12:35 PM
donquique donquique is offline
New User
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 31
Please Note: donquique is a non-member guest and is in no way affiliated with InterNACHI or its members.
Default Re: 94+ code violations and a Builders denial in Texas

I am an engineer but not a structural engineer. I am linking some information on foundations on expansive soils. Hopefully you will find some information:

http://www.usace.army.mil/publicatio...8-7/entire.pdf

Good luck.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 10/19/07, 11:08 AM
Karl E. Gerhauser's Avatar
Karl E. Gerhauser Karl E. Gerhauser is offline
InterNACHI Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Coos Bay, OR
Posts: 438
Default Re: 94+ code violations and a Builders denial in Texas

Part of my past experience was an ICBO/ICC certified special inspector. When post-tensioned slabs are being poured the law requires a special inspector to be onsite. James mentioned "It could be poor concrete design, too much water added to the concrete on site, etc." That is what the special inspector is for, He is there keeping records of the construction conditions for the architect or engineer of record and making sure the engineer's specifications are actually followed. In your case I would would be trying to access those records
IMHO
Karl
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 10/20/07, 2:11 AM
nsimpson nsimpson is offline
InterNACHI Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: DeMotte, IN
Posts: 47
Default Re: 94+ code violations and a Builders denial in Texas

www.hobb.com has alot of info and resources for Lennar homeowners. Good luck to you.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Interesting article about mold by litigation. gromicko IAC2 Indoor Air Forum 16 5/5/11 7:48 PM
Pictures of Electrical Code Violations "Defects" jtedesco1 Electrical Inspections 10 10/4/07 4:32 PM
Common Defects List by Age of House trausch Inspection Education & Training 10 6/12/06 4:52 AM
How to Recognize Electrical Code Violations jtedesco1 Inspection Education & Training 5 1/3/06 12:22 PM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 9:15 AM.


Popular Sections

:

All Sections

Inspection News

InterNACHI Membership

Inspection Standards

Inspection Education

InterNACHI Inspectors

Inspection Links

 

 

 

NACHI.ORG Statistics

 

 

no new posts