International Association of Certified Home Inspectors
|
|||||||
| Structural Inspections Contains discussions about the structural portion of a home inspection. This includes foundations, framing, etc. |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools |
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
Please Note:
jclark1 is a non-member guest and is in no way affiliated with InterNACHI or its members.
The house was built in 1999. Posts and beams on continuous footing and a perimeter raised foundation. What would you call out on this one?
1)Post to beam connection is nailed on osb "brackets" 2)The beams just end without an attachment or pocket in perimeter foundation. 3) Not sure what these bolts are in the footings. I would call out the connection or lack of between post and beam. Puget Sound area is Seismic category D |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
I would refer to it a "unconventional" construction and defer it to a licensed foundation contractor or civil/structural engineer. I hope you took a lot of pictures of the crawlspace.
The beam end should be sitting in a cast in pocket in the foundation wall. |
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
I have reservations to what I have seen as a support column and footing support. I would strongly recommend a stuctural Engineers review and or reputable Building Contractor.
Marcel |
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
75% of my inspections are crawal spaces and I've never seen anything like that. Wood 4x4s don't last forever (especially when braced with OSB). Then what? CMU supports would be the conventional method. I agree with the previous posts.
“The things that will destroy America are peace at any price, prosperity at any cost, safety first instead of duty first, the love of soft living, and the get-rich-quick theory of life.” Theodore Roosevelt Joe Funderburk, CMI Alpha & Omega Home Inspections, LLC Inspecting Upstate SC & Charlotte Metro, NC NACHI ID: NACHI05120170 www.aohomeinspection.com |
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
Please Note:
jclark1 is a non-member guest and is in no way affiliated with InterNACHI or its members.
Quote:
|
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
The wood posts don't really bother me as long as they are at least 4x4's, and treated when subject to high moisture conditions where wood rot or pest attack is a concern (e.g. poorly ventilated crawl spaces) ... although I do prefer to see masonry piers or steel columns due to those concerns.
While metal plates would be better at the beam to post connection, I'm assuming the house has typical bearing wall construction where the walls (and tie downs at those walls) provide the lateral/uplift resistance required by construction standards. Post and beam construction is a completely different story. But what rubs me the wrong way is that they used OSB scab plates, which fall apart like a cheap suit when they get wet. Not such a good idea in my mind for a moist crawl space area. And the exposed bolt/anchor at the bottom of the post is probably to provide a positive connection between the base of the post and the foundations (assuming there is a connection below the black vapor barrier), which is required in higher seismic risk areas. JMO & 2-nickels ... Robert O'Connor, PE Consulting Engineer & Inspector LIU CW Post Adjunct Professor NACHI Education Committee www.reporthost.com/-rjo I am absolutely amazed sometimes by how much thought goes into doing things wrong ... |
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
|
Please Note:
jclark1 is a non-member guest and is in no way affiliated with InterNACHI or its members.
Thanks guys
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Return air from crawl space | WHI | Inspecting HVAC Systems | 11 | 1/9/12 7:43 PM |
| Crawl space in under house | dnasser | Structural Inspections | 15 | 2/27/07 7:12 PM |
| Some good questions that always need answers | jtedesco1 | Electrical Inspections | 5 | 6/16/06 9:10 PM |