InterNACHI


Go Back   InterNACHI Inspection Forum > Specific Inspection Topics > Structural Inspections

Notices

Structural Inspections Contains discussions about the structural portion of a home inspection. This includes foundations, framing, etc.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
  #31  
Old 3/26/07, 6:15 PM
Marcel R. Cyr's Avatar
Marcel R. Cyr Marcel R. Cyr is offline
InterNACHI Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Winslow, ME
Posts: 18,918
Default Re: Insulated, Enclosed, Unventilated Attic Question

Sorrry Gerry, you did not specify.

Maybe this will help,
http://www.sprayfoam.com/spps/ahpg.cfm?spgid=6
and in anycase the closed cell contributes to structural uplift as you were concerned about. Or should say curious about?

Marcel
Reply With Quote
  #32  
Old 8/27/07, 12:46 AM
Dennis Kenman Dennis Kenman is offline
New User
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 1
Please Note: Dennis Kenman is a non-member guest and is in no way affiliated with InterNACHI or its members.
Default Re: Insulated, Enclosed, Unventilated Attic Question

I'm planning to build a house in Tucson with a flat roof. I recently discovered the claimed benefits of unvented attics and I'm intrigued; unfortunately, my builder isn't familiar with this practice.

I've seen many references to unvented attics with sloped roofs, but not many for flat roofs. Is this practice common for flat roofs? Does this practice work well for Tucson? Anybody recommend blown in cellulose? Any advice would be much appreciated.

Thank you,
Dennis
Reply With Quote
  #33  
Old 8/27/07, 5:41 AM
alarsen1's Avatar
alarsen1 alarsen1 is offline
Active Poster
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Abbotsford, BC
Posts: 233
Please Note: alarsen1 is a non-member guest and is in no way affiliated with InterNACHI or its members.
Default Re: Insulated, Enclosed, Unventilated Attic Question

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dennis Kenman
I'm planning to build a house in Tucson with a flat roof. I recently discovered the claimed benefits of unvented attics and I'm intrigued; unfortunately, my builder isn't familiar with this practice.

I've seen many references to unvented attics with sloped roofs, but not many for flat roofs. Is this practice common for flat roofs? Does this practice work well for Tucson? Anybody recommend blown in cellulose? Any advice would be much appreciated.

Thank you,
Dennis
Blown-in cellulose is a good product, so long as you have adequate soffit and ridge ventlation.

I don't believe unvented attics is common as it's a relatively new and more expensive option.

Arne
Reply With Quote
  #34  
Old 8/27/07, 7:11 AM
David P. Valley's Avatar
David P. Valley David P. Valley is offline
InterNACHI Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: METHUEN, MA
Posts: 8,684
Default Re: Insulated, Enclosed, Unventilated Attic Question

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dennis Kenman
I'm planning to build a house in Tucson with a flat roof. I recently discovered the claimed benefits of unvented attics and I'm intrigued; unfortunately, my builder isn't familiar with this practice.

I've seen many references to unvented attics with sloped roofs, but not many for flat roofs. Is this practice common for flat roofs? Does this practice work well for Tucson? Anybody recommend blown in cellulose? Any advice would be much appreciated.

Thank you,
Dennis
Dennis,

I like blown-in cellulose, but venting this flat roof will bring many varying opinions.

The typical flat or near-flat roof, with no intentional air space, is used mainly for commercial and industrial buildings. I don't see many single family homes with a flat roof. Flat roof cavities are often plagued by moisture problems. From the inside outward it consists of a structural roof deck, in most cases a near-impermeable vapor barrier, insulation, and an impermeable roofing membrane. A water and vapour trap can be created by such a system with insulation sandwiched between two membranes. If any water is present in the materials from which the roof is constructed of or moisture enters through the top by roof leaks, or from below as vapor, it may be trapped.

Such moisture will reduce the thermal resistance of the insulation and may contribute to its physical degradation and that of the membranes if they are moisture sensitive. Better performance can be assured if the designer recognizes the possibility of wetting and makes allowance for the escape of moisture from all possible sources. He can usually encourage this by roof drainage and venting.

Unfortunately, such allowances are often not designed, and an owner can be faced after a few years of service with a roof where the insulation is wet and the water is leaking into their building. Even if it is not, the wet insulation no longer provides adequate heat flow resistance. The home owner now has the drastic and expensive option of complete removal and replacement with a new system, or he may leave the roof as it is and make temporary repairs to prevent any further wetting. In this case he must attempt to dry the wet insulation in some manner.

In flat roofs, It has been a common practice (in recent years) for roofers to install breather vents in an attempt to remove moisture from moist insulation. Such vents usually consist of vertical pipes or stacks, open to the outside air, shielded from the rain by a cover and penetrating the roofing membrane to provide a path for moisture to reach to the outside. Where a rigid type of insulation is involved it is usual to cut it away below the vent and replace it with a loose form. This is intended to facilitate lateral movement of moisture through the insulation to the vents. Usually a number of such vents are aligned in one or more rows.

Reports on the effectiveness of stack venting vary widely. Some roofers and consultants claim great success in drying wet roofs; others have experienced little if any beneficial effect, and some owners insist that breathers make a bad situation worse. I like roof vents either way, I don't care what the situation is.
Reply With Quote
  #35  
Old 8/30/07, 1:30 AM
Kenton H. Shepard, CMI's Avatar
Kenton H. Shepard, CMI Kenton H. Shepard, CMI is offline
InterNACHI Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Boulder, CO
Posts: 3,407
Send a message via ICQ to kshepard
Default Re: Insulated, Enclosed, Unventilated Attic Question

Quote:
Originally Posted by bking
That method is more common further north I believe.

I wonder what the r-value is of that expanding foam.

=
3.7-6.5 per inch depending on the type of foam. Looks a little on the thin side.




Kenton Shepard, InterNACHI member # 04082383
Certified Master Inspector (CMI)
InterNACHI Director of International Development
Director of Green Building

EXPERT WITNESS SERVICE
Conventional and Log homes

(303) 717-8940
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Question about pull down attic stairs waksell Interior Inspections 33 4/2/07 12:11 AM
Home Warranty Attic Insulation Question jhawes Canadian Inspectors 2 12/4/06 2:54 AM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:06 AM.


Popular Sections

:

All Sections

Inspection News

InterNACHI Membership

Inspection Standards

Inspection Education

InterNACHI Inspectors

Inspection Links

 

 

 

NACHI.ORG Statistics

 

 

no new posts