InterNACHI


Go Back   InterNACHI Inspection Forum > Specific Inspection Topics > Structural Inspections

Notices

Structural Inspections Contains discussions about the structural portion of a home inspection. This includes foundations, framing, etc.

 
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
  #1  
Old 5/24/06, 10:50 PM
cceccarelli cceccarelli is offline
New User
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Ypsilanti, MI
Posts: 22
Please Note: cceccarelli is a non-member guest and is in no way affiliated with InterNACHI or its members.
Default Settle this dispute: H.I. vs. builder

Here's the deal. Manufactured home (i.e. mobile home) on a 9.5 ft tall, 60 ft. long block wall foundation. The front wall is leaning and shifted inward.

Look at the photos of how the home is secured to the foundation.

Just for point of reference, the wood sill plate is secured to the mobile home with screws attaching it the the steel frame. The wood is attached to the block foundation with anchors set in mortar filled into the hollow of the block. The anchor is attached to a strap that is loosely wrapped around the sill and fastened with screws (like decking screws?) and a few random nails.

What is your take on this.
Attached Thumbnails
settle-dispute-h-vs-builder-mvc-021s.jpg   settle-dispute-h-vs-builder-mvc-023s.jpg   settle-dispute-h-vs-builder-mvc-025s.jpg   settle-dispute-h-vs-builder-mvc-032s.jpg   settle-dispute-h-vs-builder-mvc-033s.jpg  

Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 5/24/06, 10:58 PM
Joseph Hagarty,  CMI's Avatar
Joseph Hagarty, CMI Joseph Hagarty,  CMI is offline
InterNACHI Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Parkesburg, PA
Posts: 5,636
Default Re: Settle this dispute: H.I. vs. builder

Quote:
Originally Posted by cceccarelli

The front wall is leaning and shifted inward.
If the foundation wall has truly shifted and is leaning inward, a recommendation for further structural review is warranted. Strapping and attachment to the foundation wall would be secondary in concern to other observations reportedly made.



Joseph P. Hagarty
joseph.hagarty@comcast.net
Main Line Inspections, Inc.
Phone: 610-399-3675
Email: MainLineHI@comcast.net

http://pa.nachi.org/mainlinepa/about.html
http://www.householdinspector.com

National President / NACHI (2003-2004)
NACHI Education Committee Member
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 5/24/06, 11:06 PM
cceccarelli cceccarelli is offline
New User
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Ypsilanti, MI
Posts: 22
Please Note: cceccarelli is a non-member guest and is in no way affiliated with InterNACHI or its members.
Default Re: Settle this dispute: H.I. vs. builder

Just so you know, in my report I did refer this whole situation to a structural engineer.

There's more to the story than I told though.

The owner called the company that set the home on the foundation. The mobile home setting company said they fastened the home to the foundation to Michigan code.

Michigan code or not, what's your take on the method and workmanship they used.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 5/25/06, 12:18 AM
rdawes's Avatar
rdawes rdawes is offline
Active Poster
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Plano, TX
Posts: 427
Please Note: rdawes is a non-member guest and is in no way affiliated with InterNACHI or its members.
Default Re: Settle this dispute: H.I. vs. builder

Quote:
Originally Posted by cceccarelli
The mobile home setting company said they fastened the home to the foundation to Michigan code.
So did they comply with these?

See Sections 6 and 7 in this:
http://www.michigan.gov/documents/dl...k_145096_7.pdf

See Part 6 in this:
http://www.state.mi.us/orr/emi/admin...Dpt=CI&RngHigh=

Approved tiedown assemblies
http://www.michigan.gov/documents/dl...s_137165_7.pdf
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 5/25/06, 10:30 AM
cceccarelli cceccarelli is offline
New User
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Ypsilanti, MI
Posts: 22
Please Note: cceccarelli is a non-member guest and is in no way affiliated with InterNACHI or its members.
Default Re: Settle this dispute: H.I. vs. builder

Ron,

I reviewed the documents you referenced. They're not descriptive enough to use. The document references back to local code and the manufacturer instruction for tie downs.

The strap for this home was fastened with decking screws and wasn't wrapped tightly. Screws don't have much shear force strength. I think the strap should have been wrapped tight around the wood sill and fastened with sufficent sized nails.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 5/25/06, 11:03 AM
rdawes's Avatar
rdawes rdawes is offline
Active Poster
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Plano, TX
Posts: 427
Please Note: rdawes is a non-member guest and is in no way affiliated with InterNACHI or its members.
Default Re: Settle this dispute: H.I. vs. builder

There is no way that installation is an approved manufacturer installation. There is no way that they used one of the approved tiedown systems in the list. Let them prove that one or both of those statements are false.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 5/30/06, 9:54 PM
David A. Andersen's Avatar
David A. Andersen David A. Andersen is offline
InterNACHI Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Woodlawn, TN
Posts: 5,924
Default Re: Settle this dispute: H.I. vs. builder

Quote:
The mobile home setting company said they fastened the home to the foundation to Michigan code.
Yea, but did it pass a code inspection?
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
MSFH - Home Inspector Fired In Dispute Over Pay jburkeson1 General Inspection Discussion 27 5/1/09 2:55 PM
Common Defects List by Age of House trausch Inspection Education & Training 10 6/12/06 4:52 AM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 9:27 AM.


Popular Sections

:

All Sections

Inspection News

InterNACHI Membership

Inspection Standards

Inspection Education

InterNACHI Inspectors

Inspection Links

 

 

 

NACHI.ORG Statistics

 

 

no new posts