InterNACHI


Go Back   InterNACHI Inspection Forum > Specific Inspection Topics > Structural Inspections

Notices

Structural Inspections Contains discussions about the structural portion of a home inspection. This includes foundations, framing, etc.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
  #46  
Old 7/19/06, 3:30 PM
William Warner's Avatar
William Warner William Warner is offline
InterNACHI Member
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Dayton, OH
Posts: 3,236
Default Re: Support post for Beam, is this right?

Not to add fuel to the fire, but ....

Are steel posts required to be tied to steel I-beams? Or is this dependent on local jurisdictions and seismic activity areas?

support-post-beam-right-image050.jpg

The bottom is constrained in basement slab.




Submit your AWARDS NOMINATIONS here

Visit the InterNACHI Awards web portal here

Blessed are the blissfully ignorant... for they shall be easily led...
Reply With Quote
  #47  
Old 7/19/06, 5:17 PM
rwand1 rwand1 is offline
Active Poster
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Caledon, ON
Posts: 7,861
Please Note: rwand1 is a non-member guest and is in no way affiliated with InterNACHI or its members.
Default Re: Support post for Beam, is this right?

Yes bolted or welded or the metal strapps wrapped around bottom of i-beam.
Reply With Quote
  #48  
Old 7/19/06, 5:51 PM
Brian E. Kelly's Avatar
Brian E. Kelly Brian E. Kelly is offline
InterNACHI Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 15,862
Default Re: Support post for Beam, is this right?

Well ,if they are using an engineered lally column it would depend on the manufacturers guidelines.

http://www.strongtie.com/products/connectors/LCC.html

Keep in mind this only pertains if they used engineered steel, and structural welding programs, and engineered welding rod .

Last edited by bkelly2; 7/19/06 at 5:54 PM..
Reply With Quote
  #49  
Old 7/19/06, 6:04 PM
Brian E. Kelly's Avatar
Brian E. Kelly Brian E. Kelly is offline
InterNACHI Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 15,862
Default Re: Support post for Beam, is this right?

My point is as an AZ HI I am required to call out any columns I see, that being said I would not hazard a guess as to if said column is installed correctly. Where is the upside for me as a HI??????
Reply With Quote
  #50  
Old 7/19/06, 6:06 PM
rwand1 rwand1 is offline
Active Poster
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Caledon, ON
Posts: 7,861
Please Note: rwand1 is a non-member guest and is in no way affiliated with InterNACHI or its members.
Default Re: Support post for Beam, is this right?

Call out any columns you see? You mean columns that are in question as to installation or other signs of distress?
Reply With Quote
  #51  
Old 7/19/06, 6:16 PM
Brian E. Kelly's Avatar
Brian E. Kelly Brian E. Kelly is offline
InterNACHI Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 15,862
Default Re: Support post for Beam, is this right?

SYSTEM: STRUCTURAL COMPONENTS4.1 The inspector shall observe:
A. structural components including:
    • foundation.
      floors.
      walls.
      columns.
      ceilings.
    • roofs.
http://www.btr.state.az.us/AZ%20Ashi%20Standards.htm
Reply With Quote
  #52  
Old 7/19/06, 7:10 PM
William Warner's Avatar
William Warner William Warner is offline
InterNACHI Member
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Dayton, OH
Posts: 3,236
Default Re: Support post for Beam, is this right?

I definitely flagged it as a concern, but I believe local jurisdictions overlook these issues as we (like many areas of the US and Canada) have not been prone to sustained high winds and/or large or high seismic events and activity ......yet.




Submit your AWARDS NOMINATIONS here

Visit the InterNACHI Awards web portal here

Blessed are the blissfully ignorant... for they shall be easily led...
Reply With Quote
  #53  
Old 7/19/06, 7:17 PM
Brian E. Kelly's Avatar
Brian E. Kelly Brian E. Kelly is offline
InterNACHI Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 15,862
Default Re: Support post for Beam, is this right?

Quote:
Originally Posted by wwarner
I definitely flagged it as a concern, but I believe local jurisdictions overlook these issues as we (like many areas of the US and Canada) have not been prone to sustained high winds and/or large or high seismic events and activity ......yet.
Has your area ever been prone to inferior construction practices??????
Reply With Quote
  #54  
Old 7/19/06, 7:23 PM
William Warner's Avatar
William Warner William Warner is offline
InterNACHI Member
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Dayton, OH
Posts: 3,236
Default Re: Support post for Beam, is this right?

Quote:
Originally Posted by bkelly2
Has your area ever been prone to inferior construction practices??????
Uhhh... nope.... not that I can recall... but thanks for asking!




Submit your AWARDS NOMINATIONS here

Visit the InterNACHI Awards web portal here

Blessed are the blissfully ignorant... for they shall be easily led...
Reply With Quote
  #55  
Old 7/19/06, 7:28 PM
Brian E. Kelly's Avatar
Brian E. Kelly Brian E. Kelly is offline
InterNACHI Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 15,862
Default Re: Support post for Beam, is this right?

Quote:
Originally Posted by wwarner
Uhhh... nope.... not that I can recall... but thanks for asking!
You are killing me William. ROTFLMAO
Reply With Quote
  #56  
Old 7/19/06, 8:44 PM
Robert J. OConnor's Avatar
Robert J. OConnor Robert J. OConnor is offline
InterNACHI Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Long Island, NY
Posts: 1,288
Default Re: Support post for Beam, is this right?

Some type of connection is required, and if it's a simple bearing end it could be a small weld on each side of the beam where it meets the plate (hidden from the photo view).



Robert O'Connor, PE
Consulting Engineer & Inspector
LIU CW Post Adjunct Professor
NACHI Education Committee
www.reporthost.com/-rjo

I am absolutely amazed sometimes by how much thought goes into doing things wrong ...
Reply With Quote
  #57  
Old 7/19/06, 8:46 PM
rwand1 rwand1 is offline
Active Poster
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Caledon, ON
Posts: 7,861
Please Note: rwand1 is a non-member guest and is in no way affiliated with InterNACHI or its members.
Default Re: Support post for Beam, is this right?

We have had Tornadoes in my area. We have also had our fair share of Terra Mottos although minor tremblers at best.
Reply With Quote
  #58  
Old 7/19/06, 9:07 PM
Marcel R. Cyr's Avatar
Marcel R. Cyr Marcel R. Cyr is offline
InterNACHI Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Winslow, ME
Posts: 18,918
Default Re: Support post for Beam, is this right?

This is ironic, because one post that was on before showed the same problem with top plate orientation to the beam support, which was wood.

This time it is of steel construction and the orientation to the beam is wrong.

The top post plate is to thin and the top plate should have been bolted with four A325 bolts.

There appears to be a seam in the pipe column and this would indicate that it is of a schedule 20 in lieu of a schedule 40 for this type of steel beam support.

Not knowing the support load, Seismic activity zone and jurisdiction it falls under for local code requirements, all this is speculation.

Minimum weld requirements for this installation in lieu of structural bolts would be two 1/4" fillet welds on both sides of the post cap bearing 1" long.

I definitely would have called this out to be revived and recommended a structural Engineer to evaluate.

Marcel
</IMG></IMG></IMG>
Reply With Quote
  #59  
Old 7/19/06, 9:19 PM
Brian E. Kelly's Avatar
Brian E. Kelly Brian E. Kelly is offline
InterNACHI Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 15,862
Default Re: Support post for Beam, is this right?

Quote:
Originally Posted by mcyr
This is ironic, because one post that was on before showed the same problem with top plate orientation to the beam support, which was wood.

This time it is of steel construction and the orientation to the beam is wrong.

The top post plate is to thin and the top plate should have been bolted with four A325 bolts.

There appears to be a seam in the pipe column and this would indicate that it is of a schedule 20 in lieu of a schedule 40 for this type of steel beam support.

Not knowing the support load, Seismic activity zone and jurisdiction it falls under for local code requirements, all this is speculation.

Minimum weld requirements for this installation in lieu of structural bolts would be two 1/4" fillet welds on both sides of the post cap bearing 1" long.

I definitely would have called this out to be revived and recommended a structural Engineer to evaluate.

Marcel
</IMG></IMG></IMG>
And I always thought you were a carpenter Marcel?

NICE
Reply With Quote
  #60  
Old 7/19/06, 9:25 PM
Marcel R. Cyr's Avatar
Marcel R. Cyr Marcel R. Cyr is offline
InterNACHI Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Winslow, ME
Posts: 18,918
Default Re: Support post for Beam, is this right?

Brian;

That is what happens when born in the Aroostook County in Maine. You get to be a Jack of All Trades and Master of none. LOL I guess a CMI is out of the question. ha. ha.

Marcel
</IMG>
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Support posts in crawl space lfoster Structural Inspections 14 12/11/06 7:28 PM
Support for Porch Roof?? mlong Structural Inspections 10 11/23/06 10:18 PM
Pillar to Post areid Canadian Inspectors 16 11/4/06 11:53 AM
Visit the NACHI/Pillar to Post booth at the Erie REALTOR Opportunity Day on Oct 12. gromicko Miscellaneous Discussion for Inspectors 0 10/6/06 12:27 PM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 6:16 AM.


Popular Sections

:

All Sections

Inspection News

InterNACHI Membership

Inspection Standards

Inspection Education

InterNACHI Inspectors

Inspection Links

 

 

 

NACHI.ORG Statistics

 

 

no new posts