This was noted as the “REVISED” goals of the committee. Some felt this was not in the best interest for freedom of expression of the “committee”, while another felt this would be the new directive. "The charter of the group is to communicate ideas, and spread the word as to what is available.
As an educational advisor, you are free to offer advice and make information and courses available. In reality, in this capacity you help unofficially steer education."
Those helping to create courses and course content input were relegated to “advisors” as opposed to contribuotors. Now the rest is history … such as question of the day, and links to educational resources - just to name a few.
Many on the committee felt their role and value became “unofficial” and irrelevant. Some resigned, and others have stayed on, but little if any discussion has since taken place.
Looks like the awards committee is still the only one doing anything .
Still active after 8 years ,3 of original still there ,Some slight changes slowed a little .
Typical Jeffery ,I and others have no control of your Blackmail methods . Seems NACHI has many, many happy members and a few who seem to be envious of others.
