CAHPI/OAHI Conference

[rwand1]

Nick

Got any pictures?

[Nick Gromicko]

I wasn't there personally.

[rwand1]

I agree with most of your comments. Bill 158 does not help home inspectors, it hinders them. It is also full of flaws and has been largely breached by OAHI for years.

Unfortunately this raises serious concerns in so far OAHI has misrepresented the title all these years, knowingly. This calls into question everything else OAHI has done as it relates to RHI and also calls into question whether or not its admissions, examinations, verifiers have been conducting business on the up and up in qualifying members. If they can't manage to portray the Act as it was meant and obligated to be, what else have they done?

[Bill Mullen]

Originally Posted by gromicko

CAHPI conference was a success, IMHO.

Thanks, Nick. I'm sure your operative at the conference confirmed that fact.

I also feel that if Terry Carson is badmouthing something, it must have something he envies and fears.

To me his comments add validity to the National Certification because most observers know Terry and how protective he is of his outdated views. In other words, if he's against something, it must be good.

Bill Mullen

[rwand1]

Thanks Nick.

[Bill Mullen]

Originally Posted by rcooke

Bill you are just confirming what I was told ,sounds like the information I received and posted is true.

("The CAHPI/OAHI conference did not go near as smooth as some would like us to think. ")
.....Cookie

Terry Carson's comments had absolutely NOTHING to do with how well the conference went. He made some comments during a round table discussion. It would have been pretty boring if everyone agreed on everything. Discussion and debate are good things, not bad.

So no, your slant on the conference is wrong. But, in your unfortunate negative world, truth must be twisted to fit your arguments. I daresy if the CAHPI leaders walked on water you would be saying they couldn't swim.

Bill Mullen

[rwand1]

It only leads to more questions...
Like how come we the members have been paying for legal advice that doesn't appear to have been valid? A Bay Street law firm no less!

[Roy D. Cooke, Sr]

Originally Posted by rwand1

1. No
2. Turns out that Terrys Bill (Pr 15 is not what it is purported to be. I love to hear his explanation on that one, and a few other explanations.
3. Roy, Bill is trying, his hands are tied. There are bigger players and too many politics behind the scenes.

Thanks guys,

Cheers,

Ray I had a discussion many moons ago and tried to convince him I was a better friend then an enemy.
He is the one who has constantly bad mouthed me and called me a liar none stop .
Sure does not look to me like he has only one thing to do with me and NACHI and that is to Using his words out "To destroy NACHI".
I have various times tried to smooth things over and he can only attack me. A simple apology would be a great place to start.

Long Live NACHI.... Cookie
</IMG></IMG></IMG></IMG>

[Bill Mullen]

Originally Posted by rwand1

It only leads to more questions...
Like how come we the members have been paying for legal advice that doesn't appear to have been valid? A Bay Street law firm no less!

This 'lawyer' also served as CAHI's lawyer (CAHI morphed into CAHPI in 2002) for many years. The day after I became CAHI President in 2001 I replaced him.

I believe this 'lawyer' was instrumental in writing a bad document and should be held accountable. I'm sure lawyers also carry E & O insurance.

I am amazed that OAHI still calls upon him for advice or anything.

Bill Mullen

[rwand1]

and... what do you do with DPPC matters where it involved complaints that involved misuse of RHI, given that the members was or is entitled to its use?

[Bill Mullen]

Originally Posted by rcooke

Ray I had a discussion many moons ago and tried to convince him I was a better friend then an enemy.
He is the one who has constantly bad mouthed me and called me a liar none stop .
Sure does not look to me like he has only one thing to do with me and NACHI and that is to Using his words out "To destroy NACHI".
I have various times tried to smooth things over and he can only attack me. A simple apology would be a great place to start.

Long Live NACHI.... Cookie
</IMG></IMG></IMG></IMG>

I accept.

Roy, if you wouldn't keep making things up you wouldn't be a liar. It's pretty simple.

Bill Mullen

[rwand1]

Mr. Segal and Mr. Carson have been aquaintances for years. They both reprented OAHI at the Ontario Legislature endorsng the Private Members Bill which they authored which created PR 158.

Mr. Segal is well aware of what is going on because he is familiar with my many emails.

[Nick Gromicko]

Bill Mullen writes:

Thanks, Nick. I'm sure your operative at the conference confirmed that fact.

I also feel that if Terry Carson is badmouthing something, it must have something he envies and fears.

To me his comments add validity to the National Certification because most observers know Terry and how protective he is of his outdated views. In other words, if he's against something, it must be good.

Bill Mullen

Ouch!

[rwand1]

Why do you think he was so adamant about not permitting Associates to vote?

s h i t; anyone in OAHI should have the vote. If you pay full dues you have a vote.

[Roy D. Cooke, Sr]

Originally Posted by bmullen1

I accept.

Roy, if you wouldn't keep making things up you wouldn't be a liar. It's pretty simple.

Bill Mullen

Bill sorry you can kiss my derriere with a reply like that you do not want to put it behind us.
With your attitude and continuing to throw slams like that .
You just can not understand that you have a hatred and have shown it none stop since I proved that OAHI lied and I won my appeal.
This has bothered you ever since.
I do hope some time you are under oath it would make my day to see you squirm when you must tell the truth.

LONG LIVE NACHI.....Cookie