InterNACHI


Go Back   InterNACHI Message Board > Geographically Specific Forums > Canadian Inspectors

Notices

Canadian Inspectors This forum is specifically for Canadian Home Inspectors.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
  #1  
Old 3/24/08, 6:49 PM
bmullen bmullen is offline
Active Poster
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Sarnia, ON
Posts: 603
Please Note: bmullen is a non-member guest and is in no way affiliated with InterNACHI or its members.
Default Carrier Furnace Class Action Suit

This is good information for our clients. We see a lot of Carrier High Efficiency furnaces.

http://www.furnaceclaims.ca

Bill Mullen
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 3/24/08, 6:53 PM
Michael Larson's Avatar
Michael Larson Michael Larson is offline
InterNACHI Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Hudson, WI including the Twin Cities of MN
Posts: 18,489
Default Re: Carrier Furnace Class Action Suit

Quote:
Originally Posted by bmullen
This is good information for our clients. We see a lot of Carrier High Efficiency furnaces.

http://www.furnaceclaims.ca

Bill Mullen
Affected model #s



"Never underestimate the difficulty of changing false beliefs by facts."
Henry Rosovsky-Harvard

Michael Larson
Hudson, WI

Services provided in East MN and West WI
InspectraPro
or
Minnesota Home Inspector

Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 3/24/08, 7:55 PM
rcooke rcooke is offline
Banned for Violating COE
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Brighton, ON
Posts: 9,381
Please Note: rcooke is a non-member guest and is in no way affiliated with InterNACHI or its members.
Default Re: Carrier Furnace Class Action Suit

Quote:
Originally Posted by bmullen
This is good information for our clients. We see a lot of Carrier High Efficiency furnaces.

http://www.furnaceclaims.ca

Bill Mullen
Great Information thanks .Bill Much appreciated .

...Cookie
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 3/24/08, 8:06 PM
bmullen bmullen is offline
Active Poster
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Sarnia, ON
Posts: 603
Please Note: bmullen is a non-member guest and is in no way affiliated with InterNACHI or its members.
Default Re: Carrier Furnace Class Action Suit

Well Roy, you know that I always say that's what NACHI's all about.........helping each other.

Bill Mullen
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 3/24/08, 10:42 PM
Christian F. Mettel Christian F. Mettel is offline
InterNACHI Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Aurora, On
Posts: 161
Default Re: Carrier Furnace Class Action Suit

Thanks Bill, good info,

Chris
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 3/25/08, 8:13 PM
John Allingham John Allingham is offline
InterNACHI Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Milton, ON
Posts: 377
Default Re: Carrier Furnace Class Action Suit

Anybody know what years are included 1988-?
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 3/25/08, 8:21 PM
rcooke rcooke is offline
Banned for Violating COE
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Brighton, ON
Posts: 9,381
Please Note: rcooke is a non-member guest and is in no way affiliated with InterNACHI or its members.
Default Re: Carrier Furnace Class Action Suit

Carrier, Bryant, Day & Night and Payne
Condensing Furnace Consumer Class Actions


Settlement Update: Federal Court Grants Preliminary Approval to Proposed Nationwide Class Action Settlement with Carrier CorporationOn November 21, 2007, U.S. District Court Judge Ronald B. Leighton granted preliminary approval to a nationwide settlement in a class action lawsuit filed by current and past owners of high-efficiency furnaces manufactured by Carrier Corporation equipped with polypropylene (plastic) laminated secondary heat exchangers. Approximately three million U.S. consumers purchased the furnaces covered under the settlement since January 1989. Carrier sold the furnaces under the Carrier, Bryant, Day & Night, and Payne brand names. The settlement also resolves companion cases in Canada and will be presented to courts there for approval as well.The settlement offers a cash payment for the tens of thousands of consumers who paid to repair or replace their furnaces as a direct result of the alleged defect in the secondary heat exchanger. The settlement also provides an enhanced 20-year warranty for consumers whose furnaces have not yet failed that will cover parts and labor for failures caused by the alleged defect.
The Proposed ClassThe Court has granted conditional certification of the following settlement class:
All individuals and entities in the United States who currently own a Carrier 90% high efficiency condensing furnace manufactured between January 1, 1989 and the date of final approval of the Settlement and equipped with a polypropylene-laminated secondary heat exchanger, and former owners of such furnaces whose furnaces experienced secondary condensing heat exchanger or CHX failure.
The Court has set a hearing to determine whether to grant final certification of the settlement class and final approval of the settlement agreement for April 22, 2008. In the coming weeks, notice will be provided to class members by first class U.S. mail and other means as to their rights under the settlement, including how to submit a claim or opt out or object to the settlement. Click here to read the Court’s order granting preliminary approval to the proposed settlement.
Background on the LitigationThe complaint, originally filed in June 2005, alleges that starting in 1989, Carrier began manufacturing and selling high efficiency condensing furnaces manufactured with a secondary condensing heat exchanger (“CHX”) made of inferior materials. Plaintiffs allege that as a result, the CHXs, which Carrier warranted and consumers expected to last for 20 years, fail prematurely. Carrier has denied these allegations and has vigorously contested the litigation. The Court has not made any ruling on the merits of plaintiffs’ allegations.
Get More InformationIf you own a Carrier, Bryant, Day & Night or Payne furnace and and would like more information regarding the settlement, please click here to contact us. Alternatively, you may visit the official case website, http://www.furnaceclaims.com/.About Lieff CabraserLieff Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein, LLP, is a national law firm with offices in San Francisco, New York and Nashville. We are recognized for our successful prosecution of individual and class action lawsuits involving defective products, ranging from faulty building and home products to faulty cars, tires and computer devices. To learn more about our firm, click here.Trademark NoticeAny use of trademarks are for informational and product identification purposes only. Lieff Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein, LLP, is not affiliated in any way with Carrier Corporation or United Technologies Corporation.
manufactured between January 1, 1989 and the date of final approval of the Settlement and equipped

...Cookie
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 3/25/08, 8:25 PM
Michael Larson's Avatar
Michael Larson Michael Larson is offline
InterNACHI Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Hudson, WI including the Twin Cities of MN
Posts: 18,489
Default Re: Carrier Furnace Class Action Suit

Quote:
Originally Posted by jallingham
Anybody know what years are included 1988-?
1989 and following. See THIS

and as noted some 1988 models



"Never underestimate the difficulty of changing false beliefs by facts."
Henry Rosovsky-Harvard

Michael Larson
Hudson, WI

Services provided in East MN and West WI
InspectraPro
or
Minnesota Home Inspector

Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 3/26/08, 11:57 AM
John Allingham John Allingham is offline
InterNACHI Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Milton, ON
Posts: 377
Default Re: Carrier Furnace Class Action Suit

Quote:
Originally Posted by mlarson
1989 and following. See THIS

and as noted some 1988 models
Thanks Michael. I spoke to them on the phone today. The claim encompasses even furnaces bought today since Carrier is still using the same materials.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
carrier/bryant/payne/day&night class action suit bking HVAC 6 1/3/08 3:02 PM
Proposed Class Action Settlement "Sears" Anti-tip Device mcyr General Inspection Discussion 3 11/8/07 7:18 AM
CSST Class Action jhagarty HVAC 21 12/16/06 1:56 AM
Carrier furnace info jburk2 HVAC 3 9/19/06 12:57 AM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:44 AM.


Copyright © International Association of Certified Home Inspectors, Inc. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147

Popular Sections

:

All Sections

Popular

Membership

Inspection Standards

Education

Chapters & Members

Articles & Links

Other Organizations

 

 

 

NACHI.ORG Statistics

 

 

no new posts