COE 3.III reminder.

[Nick Gromicko]

www.nachi.org/code_of_ethics.htm

Particularly "fellow members" reference.

[Michael Larson]

Originally Posted by rwand2

Thanks Nick that is a good reminder.

I just had my membership accepted and already a few members have breached the rules to which they preach to everyone accept themselves.

Yeah,

I like this one a lot.

3. The InterNACHI member shall not engage in any act or practice that could be deemed damaging, seditious or destructive to InterNACHI, fellow InterNACHI members, InterNACHI employees, leadership or directors. Member(s) accused of acting or deemed in violation of such rules shall be reviewed by the Ethics committee for possible sanctions and/or expulsion from InterNACHI.

[Michael Larson]

Originally Posted by rwand2

What rule is that? The one you continually breach?

Again Wand.

Put up or shut up.

[Michael Larson]

Originally Posted by rwand2

Boy you are slow, its not me who has to prove anything but rather you!

You sure are desperate. If you cannot make points then shut up already!

"Never underestimate the difficulty of changing false beliefs by facts."
Henry Rosovsky-Harvard

You made the accusation

Originally Posted by rwand2

What rule is that? The one you continually breach?

so the burden of proof is on you silly boy.

[Nick Gromicko]

Reminder again.

[Michael Larson]

Originally Posted by rwand2

The burden of proof is not on me considering you are here repeatedly posting the rules you continuously breach.

When do you plan on setting a good example?

This is why no one takes you seriously.

Your good at making false accusations that that you can't back up.

That alone reflects badly on NACHI.

[Michael Larson]

Originally Posted by rwand2

Yet another example of stellar behavior by the man himself. Priceless.

Here is a fairy tale for you Ray.

The Three Little Pigs

[Joe Farsetta]

Nick,

Ray Wand has been back the equivalent of a nano-second in this organization, and has managed in his short tenure to do the following:

ESOP Thread in Canadian Forum

Page 1, Post 5 - Disparages Jeff Jonas
Page 1, Post 6 - Continues the tirade.
Page 1, Post 8 - More lies and innuendo
Page 1, Post 11 - Attacks Mike LArson
Page 2, Post 17 - Disparages Mike LArson further.
PAge 2, Post 18 - Another attack on Jeff Jonas
PAge 2, Post 24 - Taunts Mike LArson with more lies
Page 2, Post 26 - Roy Cooke joins the fray. The ray and Roy show is back.
Page 2, Post 28 - Pretends to be "in the know" and change is in the wind. Advises member to pack his bags.
Page 3, Post 38 - Attacks continue. More disparaging coomments against a member.
Page 3, Post 42 - More nonsense
Page 3, Post 48 - Roy Cooke chimes in again. Violates agreement.
Page 4, Post 55 - Ray brings NACHI COunsel mark Cohen into the fray.
PAge 4, Post 63 - Friend requests from Ray are unwelcome. Constitutes harassment.

This was all in the span of less than 2 hours.

It was a poor decision to allow Ray Wand re-entry
In retrospect, Roy Cooke cannot be trusted.

I recommend the immediate removal of Ray Wand, and putting Roy Cooke back in a probationary membership status.

While Roy did not violate the COE today, he did violate the terms of his reinstatement, at which time he was warned that any transgression would result in sanctions or expulsion from the organization.

Ray, on the other hand, upon re-instatement, immediately went on the attack. This cannot be allowed to stand. He remains in violation of the COE, and has once again shown his true colors.

[Christopher Currins]

Originally Posted by jfarsetta

Nick,

Ray Wand has been back the equivalent of a nano-second in this organization, and has managed in his short tenure to do the following:


Ray, on the other hand, upon re-instatement, immediately went on the attack. This cannot be allowed to stand. He remains in violation of the COE, and has once again shown his true colors.

You're making Ray nervous Joe. 5 minutes ago he had 40 post (not one relating to a home inspection), now he has 15. delete, delete, delete.

Make that 11.

[Roy D. Cooke, Sr]

Originally Posted by jfarsetta

Nick,

Ray Wand has been back the equivalent of a nano-second in this organization, and has managed in his short tenure to do the following:

ESOP Thread in Canadian Forum

Page 1, Post 5 - Disparages Jeff Jonas
Page 1, Post 6 - Continues the tirade.
Page 1, Post 8 - More lies and innuendo
Page 1, Post 11 - Attacks Mike LArson
Page 2, Post 17 - Disparages Mike LArson further.
PAge 2, Post 18 - Another attack on Jeff Jonas
PAge 2, Post 24 - Taunts Mike LArson with more lies
Page 2, Post 26 - Roy Cooke joins the fray. The ray and Roy show is back.
Page 2, Post 28 - Pretends to be "in the know" and change is in the wind. Advises member to pack his bags.
Page 3, Post 38 - Attacks continue. More disparaging coomments against a member.
Page 3, Post 42 - More nonsense
Page 3, Post 48 - Roy Cooke chimes in again. Violates agreement.
Page 4, Post 55 - Ray brings NACHI COunsel mark Cohen into the fray.
PAge 4, Post 63 - Friend requests from Ray are unwelcome. Constitutes harassment.

This was all in the span of less than 2 hours.

It was a poor decision to allow Ray Wand re-entry
In retrospect, Roy Cooke cannot be trusted.

I recommend the immediate removal of Ray Wand, and putting Roy Cooke back in a probationary membership status.

While Roy did not violate the COE today, he did violate the terms of his reinstatement, at which time he was warned that any transgression would result in sanctions or expulsion from the organization.

Ray, on the other hand, upon re-instatement, immediately went on the attack. This cannot be allowed to stand. He remains in violation of the COE, and has once again shown his true colors.

Joe you are showing just how Unfair you are you have not shown that I and Ray where attacked first and have only stood up against Improper attacks by others .
I know you are showing an unbalanced report .... Roy

[Roy D. Cooke, Sr]

Originally Posted by ccurrins

You're making Ray nervous Joe. 5 minutes ago he had 40 post (not one relating to a home inspection), now he has 15. delete, delete, delete.

Make that 11.

One of the other Canadian Members asked all to try and get along and I deleted many of my posts where I was defending my self from attacks from other members .
I expect Ray was doing the same .
I and Ray did not attack we defended our selves .
Why do you choose to ignore what they others have done .
Do you not feel fair play is proper all people should be treated equally .. Roy

[Linas Dapkus]

Originally Posted by rcooke

One of the other Canadian Members asked all to try and get along and I deleted many of my posts where I was defending my self from attacks from other members .
I expect Ray was doing the same .
I and Ray did not attack we defended our selves .
Why do you choose to ignore what they others have done .
Do you not feel fair play is proper all people should be treated equally .. Roy

Why don't you leave your posts and let everyone decide on their own if you and your butt buddy were attacked? Why delete them if they were merely defensive posts?????????

[KEVIN WOOD]

Simple answer to that is they where asked by a professional to remove the posts. The name has been withheld.

[Roy D. Cooke, Sr]

Originally Posted by ldapkus1

Why don't you leave your posts and let everyone decide on their own if you and your butt buddy were attacked? Why delete them if they were merely defensive posts?????????

I wonder what your purpose is on asking these questions is it to make me look bad .
They do not seem to be in defence of you... Roy

[Michael Larson]

Originally Posted by kwood

Simple answer to that is they where asked by a professional to remove the posts. The name has been withheld.

No problem Kevin.

As you see I took the precaution to quote Ray's post when responding to him.

It's all good.