First time buyer grant

[Mario A. Kyriacou, CHI]

Originally Posted by Raymond Wandmagic

Mario Are you proud of yourself. Looks like things are backfiring on you! More to come and more friends to lose. You never should have started slandering my name as you did when things were nice and quiet. Remember you started this once again when you referred to me by name as an SOB in your replies to Char Cooke. You really are thick!

You are a son of a *****!

[Raymond Wandmagic]

Mario Thats not nice. That was the other thing I found out about you when I spoke to someone that knows you. They said you had a limited vocabulary.

[Mario A. Kyriacou, CHI]

Originally Posted by Raymond Wandmagic

Mario Thats not nice. That was the other thing I found out about you when I spoke to someone that knows you. They said you had a limited vocabulary.

Saved

[Raymond Wandmagic]

Come on Mario you can do better than that! Do you have these sort of conversations with your family?

[Canadian Inspector]

Originally Posted by Raymond Wandmagic

Mario Are you proud of yourself. Looks like things are backfiring on you! More to come and more friends to lose. You never should have started slandering my name as you did when things were nice and quiet. Remember you started this once again when you referred to me by name as an SOB in your replies to Char Cooke.

You really are thick!
No LITTLE Ray you are resally thick!

In other posts you DENY being the "Real" Ray Wand and here you admit it.

You to stupid to know that your IP address will always give you away! DUH!

HEY MIDGET AKA,
RAYMOND WAND, AKA, RAYMONDO WAND, AKA "MAGIC WAND"
All of Ontario is laughing at you!

You stand four feet nothing tall and to compensate for your little stature you have tried to be a "Big Man" and tried to violate the Code of Ethics of ALL of the associations that you belong to and you have paid the price!

This has led to your downfall!

You have been kicked out by EVERY association that you have ever belonged to and as an expelled member you have NOTHING to say about how NACHI is run.

Now that you and that other cancerous hemorrhoidial person have been removed Nick will see that those who "left NACHI" and refused to post on this message board will come back and come back stronger than ever!

RAYMOND WAND = A CODE OF ETHICS VIOLATOR = A PERSON WHO IS NOT TO BE TRUSTED = AN EXPELLED MEMBER OF NACHI!

PS:

Lighten up LITTLE Ray!

Midgets / Dwarfs & Clowns like you are supposed to be "Jolly People"

[Raymond Wandmagic]

Thanks Gil Strachan, Love The Andy Worral Type Litho!

[FRED ODETTE]

I simply posted a question about getting a grant . HOW THE HELL DID IT SWITCH TO THIS BULL**** !

[Mario A. Kyriacou, CHI]

Nick Gromicko vbmenu_register("postmenu_354931", true);
NACHI
InterNACHI Member

User Name: gromicko
Location: Valley Forge, PA
Posts: 12,262

ESOP's decision supported by mathematical analysis.
Recently ESOP expelled 2 Canadian members. I was personally opposed to the decisions to have them removed from InterNACHI. One of the 2 is a close personal friend of mine who has helped InterNACHI and me many times for many years. I'd go as far as saying there wouldn't be an InterNACHI presence in Canada without him. He is a good friend and I love him. But before everyone (including me) starts thinking poorly of ESOP, I wanted to state for the record that the chances of this decision having little to do with the 2 ex-members is almost zero. Clearly the two ex-members played a role in their fate.

For many years, leaders and members of other Canadian associations have sent me email after email after email (hundreds in all) complaining about these very 2 members. I ignored all of them for years, until today. Today I decided to calculate what the odds were of this being pure coincidence.

There are about 3,000 inspectors in Canada of which my inbox for years is packed with complaints from 2 other Canadian associations regarding only 2 inspectors. I won't go into all their charges and complaints. Anyway, ESOP recently removed the very same 2 inspectors from InterNACHI. InterNACHI almost never expelles anyone, so the results of our analysis should end up dramatic.

Let's see what the odds of this being pure coincidence (the ex-members being innocent victims of ESOP and having played no role this situation) are. The odds of one of the 2 members ESOP expelled, also being one of the 2 very other inspectors that the other associations had trouble with, is 1 in 1,500 (there is a 1 in 1500 chance of drawing 1 of 2 inspectors from a pool of 3,000). Then, the odds of the exact other inspector being expelled by ESOP is 1 in 2,999 (there is a 1 in 2,999 chance of drawing 1 inspector from a pool 2,999).

Now here is where it gets interesting. The odds of them expelling those exact 2 members coincidentally (meaning that the ex-members themselves had NO ROLE in any of this and are purely innocent victims of ESOP) is (1 divided by 1,500) times (1 divided by 2,999) or 1 in 4,498,500. Or in other words... impossible.

I waited until after ESOPs decision today to make this post.

One of the 2 ex-members is my dear friend and always will be. I love him. But basic probability and statistics support several of ESOPs contentions.
--

[Raymond Wandmagic]

Mario A. Kyriacou mkyriacou is offline 360 Degrees Home Inspections WWW InterNACHI Member mkyriacou has a reputation beyond repute mkyriacou has a reputation beyond repute mkyriacou has a reputation beyond repute mkyriacou has a reputation beyond repute mkyriacou has a reputation beyond repute mkyriacou has a reputation beyond repute mkyriacou has a reputation beyond repute mkyriacou has a reputation beyond repute mkyriacou has a reputation beyond repute mkyriacou has a reputation beyond repute mkyriacou has a reputation beyond repute User Name: mkyriacou Location: Toronto, ON Posts: 3,743 Default Re: First time buyer grant http://www.nachi.org/forum/image.php...1137126464Nick Gromicko vbmenu_register("postmenu_354931", true); NACHI InterNACHI Member User Name: gromicko Location: Valley Forge, PA Posts: 12,262 ESOP's decision supported by mathematical analysis. Recently ESOP expelled 2 Canadian members. I was personally opposed to the decisions to have them removed from InterNACHI. One of the 2 is a close personal friend of mine who has helped InterNACHI and me many times for many years. I'd go as far as saying there wouldn't be an InterNACHI presence in Canada without him. He is a good friend and I love him. But before everyone (including me) starts thinking poorly of ESOP, I wanted to state for the record that the chances of this decision having little to do with the 2 ex-members is almost zero. Clearly the two ex-members played a role in their fate. For many years, leaders and members of other Canadian associations have sent me email after email after email (hundreds in all) complaining about these very 2 members. I ignored all of them for years, until today. Today I decided to calculate what the odds were of this being pure coincidence. There are about 3,000 inspectors in Canada of which my inbox for years is packed with complaints from 2 other Canadian associations regarding only 2 inspectors. I won't go into all their charges and complaints. Anyway, ESOP recently removed the very same 2 inspectors from InterNACHI. InterNACHI almost never expelles anyone, so the results of our analysis should end up dramatic. Let's see what the odds of this being pure coincidence (the ex-members being innocent victims of ESOP and having played no role this situation) are. The odds of one of the 2 members ESOP expelled, also being one of the 2 very other inspectors that the other associations had trouble with, is 1 in 1,500 (there is a 1 in 1500 chance of drawing 1 of 2 inspectors from a pool of 3,000). Then, the odds of the exact other inspector being expelled by ESOP is 1 in 2,999 (there is a 1 in 2,999 chance of drawing 1 inspector from a pool 2,999). Now here is where it gets interesting. The odds of them expelling those exact 2 members coincidentally (meaning that the ex-members themselves had NO ROLE in any of this and are purely innocent victims of ESOP) is (1 divided by 1,500) times (1 divided by 2,999) or 1 in 4,498,500. Or in other words... impossible. I waited until after ESOPs decision today to make this post. One of the 2 ex-members is my dear friend and always will be. I love him. But basic probability and statistics support several of ESOPs contentions. --

[Mario A. Kyriacou, CHI]

For many years, leaders and members of other Canadian associations have sent me email after email after email (hundreds in all) complaining about these very 2 members. I ignored all of them for years, until today. Today I decided to calculate what the odds were of this being pure coincidence.

Wow!! This must have made Nick's job very difficult.

[Raymond Wandmagic]

More bull from spineless Mario! Talk, talk, talk. No blood, no guts, no glory. All hot air!