Get paid to generate renewable energy

[Roy D. Cooke, Sr]

Originally Posted by jbraun

Mikey does not like it when a working class guy takes advantage of government incentives. He has an illusion like most Republicans that only the rich people should be handed government checks. Sad but true.

Thanks James .


He has proven many times how little he thinks of me and tries to belittle me .
Well Michael carry on showing just how great you are not .
Nachi is better then this to have members like Mr Larson attacking members is wrong and he should say he is sorry .
Not need not wanted and it only tends to show others how bad some members are .

[Michael Larson]

Originally Posted by rcooke

Thanks James .


He has proven many times how little he thinks of me and tries to belittle me .
Well Michael carry on showing just how great you are not .
Nachi is better then this to have members like Mr Larson attacking members is wrong and he should say he is sorry .
Not need not wanted and it only tends to show others how bad some members are .

Just the facts Roy boy.

You go ahead and tell the folks if you like.

[ROBERT V. YOUNG]

Not really Mr.Larson.
Many work for the government and they are paid by the tax payer. Leeches ?
He is providing a service that the free market enterprise is willing to pay for.
He is providing job and growth in a new industry.
I can not see how that is being a leech.
There is a positive offshoot to green energy, And there is a offshoot and that is less pollution. ( somewhat green I should say. The manufacturing of the device is polluting)
Now a good example of a leech is Brian MacNiech.
Gives nothing and you have to listen to his tiny building science lectures. HA HA HA.
Now that is pollution. HA HA HA
To me leeches are investors that speculate on downward and upward possible trends. They never use or rarely use the service, yet spectulate the potential stream and it affects the free market from acting efficiently.
They offer nothing but a promise of money. No labor or goods.
They bet on futures. Bloody Leeches.

I think we discused the free market on another thead. Its not free in the truer sense of the word.
Derivatives mathematical science fiction have complicated the free market.
Also investers pay for aservice they seldom or never use.

[ROBERT V. YOUNG]

Sorry Mr.Larson
I was tired. Did not complete my example.
Providing a service a commodity, excess solar electricity.
Should one donate the excess power to the public? Up to the individual.
InterNACHI member providing a needed service to the Ontario Province.
The tax payers buying energy.
Name calling should be left out of the equation.
Here is a small sample of fact.
http://www.golder.com/fr/en/modules....article_id=258
Maybe they should think of alternatives, and America to.
http://www.iaea.org/newscenter/news/...iupdate01.html

Rebuttal Michel please.


Thank you Michel.

[Nick Gromicko]

The purpose of publicly subsidizing solar is to give it a chance to get going against a developed carbon-based industry that has been subsidized (by taxpayers) for years. It is the existing energy industries that are the leeches and supported by tax dollars. Ever hear of the Gulf wars, the GM and Chrysler bailouts, or bridges?

[ROBERT V. YOUNG]

Originally Posted by gromicko

The purpose of publicly subsidizing solar is to give it a chance to get going against a developed carbon-based industry that has been subsidized (by taxpayers) for years. It is the existing energy industries that are the leeches and supported by tax dollars. Ever hear of the Gulf wars, the GM and Chrysler bailouts, or bridges?

I hopefully will be able to utilize my thoughts and sentence structure like that.
All thanks to InterNACHI and a little effort.

[Wand Raymond]

I think Mikeys wife must subsidize him to stay home because he has no visible means of support.

I guess that makes him a 'leech'.

[Wand Raymond]

Originally Posted by gromicko

The purpose of publicly subsidizing solar is to give it a chance to get going against a developed carbon-based industry that has been subsidized (by taxpayers) for years. It is the existing energy industries that are the leeches and supported by tax dollars. Ever hear of the Gulf wars, the GM and Chrysler bailouts, or bridges?

Does Mikey have a problem with the subsidized gifts that you are handing out to fellow Nachi members?

I think a collection should be taken up so Mikey can have a new 'soother', his old one is sucked out.

[Michael Larson]

Originally Posted by ryoung7

Not really Mr.Larson.
Many work for the government and they are paid by the tax payer. Leeches ?

Sorry you will not find much support for government workers from me. do we really need all of them?

Example:Our local motor vehicle driver's license office employs 3 people to do the job of one and there is another separate location for vehicle registration with even more "employees". Just what do they produce for the benefit of society? Dumb and dumber

He is providing a service that the free market enterprise is willing to pay for.
He is providing job and growth in a new industry.
I can not see how that is being a leech.

That is not a free market. Please look it up. So you will be buying my Buick t 8 times it's worth? Great I'll clean it up for you.

There is a positive offshoot to green energy, And there is a offshoot and that is less pollution. ( somewhat green I should say. The manufacturing of the device is polluting)

First you have to demonstrate there is actually a cost benefit before you prolaim magical results. Again. Look it up.

Now a good example of a leech is Brian MacNiech.
Gives nothing and you have to listen to his tiny building science lectures. HA HA HA.
Now that is pollution. HA HA HA

No comment

To me leeches are investors that speculate on downward and upward possible trends. They never use or rarely use the service, yet spectulate the potential stream and it affects the free market from acting efficiently.
They offer nothing but a promise of money. No labor or goods.
They bet on futures. Bloody Leeches.

Let's not pretend that that you don't do the same thing. You invest with hope of a return on that investment. Get it?

I think we discused the free market on another thead. Its not free in the truer sense of the word.
Derivatives mathematical science fiction have complicated the free market.
Also investers pay for aservice they seldom or never use.

If you really believe in a free market you should at least understand what one is before taking about it.

The only entity that holds a gun to your head and demands payment is the government(well that and the mob)

[Michael Larson]

Originally Posted by gromicko

The purpose of publicly subsidizing solar is to give it a chance to get going against a developed carbon-based industry that has been subsidized (by taxpayers) for years. It is the existing energy industries that are the leeches and supported by tax dollars. Ever hear of the Gulf wars, the GM and Chrysler bailouts, or bridges?

One word ETHANOL.

How's that working after 20 plus years?

BTW- I agree that we subsidize the oil industry to some extent through our wars in the middle East. But what choice do we have until the greens stop us from developing our own energy resources?

[Michael Larson]

Originally Posted by ryoung7

Sorry Mr.Larson
I was tired. Did not complete my example.
Providing a service a commodity, excess solar electricity.
Should one donate the excess power to the public? Up to the individual.
InterNACHI member providing a needed service to the Ontario Province.
The tax payers buying energy.
Name calling should be left out of the equation.
Here is a small sample of fact.
http://www.golder.com/fr/en/modules....article_id=258
Maybe they should think of alternatives, and America to.
http://www.iaea.org/newscenter/news/...iupdate01.html

Rebuttal Michel please.


Thank you Michel.

You have not explained why paying 8 times the going rate for electricity is a good idea especially in a country as energy rich as Canada.

It's about time we call those who depend on a government subsidy what they are.

You may not like the term leech but it is very fitting in many cases.

[Wayne B. Wilson]

Works for Canada Micheal Jealous?

[Michael Larson]

Originally Posted by wwilson3

Works for Canada Micheal Jealous?

If it was so great, why did you leave?

[Nick Gromicko]

BTW- I agree that we subsidize the oil industry to some extent through our wars in the middle East. But what choice do we have until the greens stop us from developing our own energy resources?

One "choice we have" is to subsidize solar. That would be "developing our own energy resources."

[Wand Raymond]

http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2011-0...ry-hotels.html

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Agricultural_subsidy

http://ca.news.yahoo.com/boeing-rece...75320-039.html

http://www.google.com/hostednews/afp...003b822c9f.941

http://www.guardian.co.uk/global-dev...obama-must-act

I guess Michael is a leech, he eats US produce, pays taxes to subsidize what he condemns in Canada.

Always the hypocrite, always showing what a know-it-all he really isn't.