InterNACHI


Go Back   InterNACHI Inspection Forum > Local Inspection Issues > Canadian Inspectors

Notices

Canadian Inspectors This is a place for Canadian InterNACHI inspectors and other inspectors in Canada to discuss local inspection topics.

 
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
  #121  
Old 5/2/08, 1:01 PM
klott's Avatar
klott klott is offline
InterNACHI Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: monroe, ga
Posts: 8,707
Default Re: Inventions and Innovations Nominations

Someone should forward David's info to Flir, if they don't want to, send it to me and I will. David probably does not want to Toot his own horn. He seems rather humble.
Reply With Quote
  #122  
Old 5/2/08, 1:16 PM
Canadian Inspector Canadian Inspector is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Canada
Posts: 92
Please Note: Canadian Inspector is a non-member guest and is in no way affiliated with InterNACHI or its members.
Default Re: Inventions and Innovations Nominations

Quote:
Originally Posted by klott
There are reasons, rules and existing laws, which prohibit employees and/or family members from participating and/or being eligible to win prizes and/or money in Promotional Giveaways, Contest and Lotteries.

In the future, there should be a rule added, that prohibits members of The Awards Commitee;

1) From being eligible to receive any awards and/or endorsements.

2) Nomination of anyone for an award and/or endorsement, by any commitee member.
That should have been a big "DUH"!

3) Any solicitation by any member, for an award and/or endorsement, for any idea, and/or physical devices.

4) Any consideration or nominations, by any member of Nachi must be accompanied by the original date and supporting evidence of the idea and/or physical device, belongs to the Nominee.

It might prevent another embarrassing fiasco, from happening in the future.
Kenneth,
What you have posted is just common sense and should have been glaringly obvious to the "Awards Committee".


You would think that any reasonable man would have thought this out.

This is NOT the first time that Members of the "Awards Committee" have been nominating other members of the "Awards Committee" for public recognition!


What an embarrassment!
Reply With Quote
  #123  
Old 5/2/08, 1:26 PM
Brian E. Kelly's Avatar
Brian E. Kelly Brian E. Kelly is offline
InterNACHI Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 15,973
Default Re: Inventions and Innovations Nominations

Quote:
Originally Posted by Canadian Inspector
Kenneth,
What you have posted is just common sense and should have been glaringly obvious to the "Awards Committee".


You would think that any reasonable man would have thought this out.

This is NOT the first time that Members of the "Awards Committee" have been nominating other members of the "Awards Committee" for public recognition!



What an embarrassment!

Really, oh sagacious one there have been other transgressions, do tell.
</IMG> Care to expound on this
Reply With Quote
  #124  
Old 5/2/08, 1:26 PM
klott's Avatar
klott klott is offline
InterNACHI Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: monroe, ga
Posts: 8,707
Default Re: Inventions and Innovations Nominations

Now in all fairness to Marcel, he did not nominate anyone, he just posted it on the BB, which is one of his duties, so he should not be criticized for his action in this matter.
Reply With Quote
  #125  
Old 5/2/08, 1:30 PM
Canadian Inspector Canadian Inspector is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Canada
Posts: 92
Please Note: Canadian Inspector is a non-member guest and is in no way affiliated with InterNACHI or its members.
Default Re: Inventions and Innovations Nominations

Quote:
Originally Posted by bkelly2
Really, oh sagacious one there have been other transgressions, do tell.
</IMG> Care to expound on this
Check last years nominations!
Reply With Quote
  #126  
Old 5/2/08, 2:01 PM
Frank Magdefrau's Avatar
Frank Magdefrau Frank Magdefrau is offline
InterNACHI Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Hernando, MS
Posts: 3,397
Default Re: Inventions and Innovations Nominations

Quote:
Originally Posted by dandersen


I don't believe the point of this issue is about the validity of the device. It's all about ethics.
Yes, it is all about what is right and what is wrong. Thank you David.



Frank Magdefrau
Certified Master Inspector
DeSoto Home Inspection Services, LLC
3152 Big Ben S
Hernando, MS 38632
(901) 486-0421

InterNACHI Member since 2002
InterNACHI message board member since 2003
InterNACHI ESOP member from 2004 to 2010

Reply With Quote
  #127  
Old 5/2/08, 2:20 PM
Joe Farsetta's Avatar
Joe Farsetta Joe Farsetta is offline
ESOP Committee Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Pearl River, NY
Posts: 4,115
Default Re: Inventions and Innovations Nominations

Then someone please formally nominate Mr. Andersen.
Reply With Quote
  #128  
Old 5/2/08, 2:52 PM
David A. Andersen's Avatar
David A. Andersen David A. Andersen is offline
InterNACHI Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Woodlawn, TN
Posts: 5,927
Default Re: Inventions and Innovations Nominations

Joe, I thank you and others for your consideration.

I would like to say (in rebuttal of your well class flaming), I purchased my first well last year (as I added an adjacent farm to mine) and the information was invaluable to understand my geologist!

I don't come across many wells in my service area, but "now I KNOW" the answers.
Reply With Quote
  #129  
Old 5/8/08, 2:21 AM
Canadian Inspector Canadian Inspector is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Canada
Posts: 92
Please Note: Canadian Inspector is a non-member guest and is in no way affiliated with InterNACHI or its members.
Default Nick supports the ESOP......Re: Inventions and Innovations Nominations

ESOP's decision supported by mathematical analysis.

Recently ESOP expelled 2 Canadian members. I was personally opposed to the decisions to have them removed from InterNACHI. One of the 2 is a close personal friend of mine who has helped InterNACHI and me many times for many years. I'd go as far as saying there wouldn't be an InterNACHI presence in Canada without him. He is a good friend and I love him. But before everyone (including me) starts thinking poorly of ESOP, I wanted to state for the record that the chances of this decision having little to do with the 2 ex-members is almost zero. Clearly the two ex-members played a role in their fate.

For many years, leaders and members of other Canadian associations have sent me email after email after email (hundreds in all) complaining about these very 2 members. I ignored all of them for years, until today. Today I decided to calculate what the odds were of this being pure coincidence.

There are about 3,000 inspectors in Canada of which my inbox for years is packed with complaints from 2 other Canadian associations regarding only 2 inspectors. I won't go into all their charges and complaints. Anyway, ESOP recently removed the very same 2 inspectors from InterNACHI. InterNACHI almost never expelles anyone,s so the results of our analysis should end up dramatic.

Let's see what the odds of this being pure coincidence (the ex-members being innocent victims of ESOP and having played no role this situation) are. The odds of one of the 2 members ESOP expelled, also being one of the 2 very other inspectors that the other associations had trouble with, is 1 in 1,500 (there is a 1 in 1500 chance of drawing 1 of 2 inspectors from a pool of 3,000). Then, the odds of the exact other inspector being expelled by ESOP is 1 in 3,000 (there is a 1 in 2,999 chance of drawing 1 inspector from a pool 2,999).

Now here is where it gets interesting. The odds of them expelling those exact 2 members coincidentally (meaning that the ex-members themselves had NO ROLE in any of this and are purely innocent victims of ESOP) is (1 divided by 1,500) times (1 divided by 2,999) or 1 in 4,498,500. Or in other words... impossible.

I waited until after ESOPs decision today to make this post.

One of the 2 ex-members is my dear friend and always will be. I love him. But basic probability and statistics support several of ESOPs contentions. --
Nick Gromicko, CMI
Founder


QUOTE: Nick Gromicko
There are about 3,000 inspectors in Canada of which my inbox for years is packed with complaints from 2 other Canadian associations regarding only 2 inspectors. I won't go into all their charges and complaints.
The complaints were for .... get ready for a shocker.... Code of Ethics Violations!

Anyway, ESOP recently removed the very same 2 inspectors from InterNACHI.
End Quote:


Raymond Wand and Roy Cooke have been and continue to be an EMBARRASSMENT and a DISGRACE to the ENTIRE Canadian Home Inspector's Industry!

The numerous complaints over the last few years do not lie!

Nick is a smart man..... We are ALL glad to see him finally come to his senses!
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Inventions and Innovations Nominations mcyr General Inspection Discussion 5 4/24/08 6:13 AM
Inventions and Innovations Nominations mcyr Canadian Inspectors 0 4/20/08 10:00 AM
Inventions and Innovations Nominations mcyr General Inspection Discussion 0 4/20/08 9:59 AM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 4:14 PM.


Popular Sections

:

All Sections

Inspection News

InterNACHI Membership

Inspection Standards

Inspection Education

InterNACHI Inspectors

Inspection Links

 

 

 

NACHI.ORG Statistics

 

 

no new posts