My Response to Raymond Wand

[Joe Farsetta]

Ray posted the following:

2nd posting.

I would like to propose the following in order to bring back calm on the board.

I will apologize to Joe Farsetta for posting his private email to me, if Joe apologizes for sending me the email.

What da ya say Joe. Shall we bury the hatchett?

In good conscience, I really cant apologize to Ray. I say this because the e-mail he wants me to apologize for sending him, was part of a larger string of e-mails initiated by he and Roy to ME, and not visaversa. I was replying. I was not sending. Sending intimates that the conversation was initiated by me. In this instance, it was not. So, there is nothing to apologize for.


I will, however, agree to move on.

[Raymond E. Wand]

Ray posted the following:

Quote:
2nd posting.

I would like to propose the following in order to bring back calm on the board.

I will apologize to Joe Farsetta for posting his private email to me, if Joe apologizes for sending me the email.

What da ya say Joe. Shall we bury the hatchett?


In good conscience, I really cant apologize to Ray. I say this because the e-mail he wants me to apologize for sending him, was part of a larger string of e-mails initiated by he and Roy to ME, and not visaversa. I was replying. I was not sending. Sending intimates that the conversation was initiated by me. In this instance, it was not. So, there is nothing to apologize for.


I will, however, agree to move on.

And I agree to move on as well.

[Michael Bazzo, CMI]

Originally Posted by jfarsetta

Ray posted the following:




In good conscience, I really cant apologize to Ray. I say this because the e-mail he wants me to apologize for sending him, was part of a larger string of e-mails initiated by he and Roy to ME, and not visaversa. I was replying. I was not sending. Sending intimates that the conversation was initiated by me. In this instance, it was not. So, there is nothing to apologize for.


I will, however, agree to move on.

I take this to mean your going to be the bigger man and not post on this topic again, maybe this way, the only two carrying on this debacle will be ray and roy

[Roy D. Cooke, Sr]

Originally Posted by Raymond E. Wand

And I agree to move on as well.

Good move .
I agree to move on as well.
...Cookie

[Michael Bazzo, CMI]

Thank God!!!!!!!!!

[Roy D. Cooke, Sr]

Originally Posted by mbazzo

I take this to mean your going to be the bigger man and not post on this topic again, maybe this way, the only two carrying on this debacle will be ray and roy

I do not see where any one is any bigger then the other it was Raymond who made the offer he did it twice .
Now it is past and I hope others leave it in the past too.

...Cookie thanks to all

[Raymond E. Wand]

Michael

Mind your own business, and read what we agreed to!

[James H. Bushart]

Now, hopefully, Mr. Wand can go away peacefully.

[Raymond E. Wand]

Bushfart,

Once again you have proven your inability to stay away. Mind your own business.

[James H. Bushart]

Originally Posted by Raymond E. Wand

Bushfart,

Once again you have proven your inability to stay away. Mind your own business.

***** off

[Michael Larson]

Originally Posted by Raymond E. Wand

Michael

Mind your own business, and read what we agreed to!

OK Twit

[James H. Bushart]

Originally Posted by rcooke

James some times it is a good idea to say nothing and this looks like the correct time ...Cookie

Roy,

What does "move on" mean, then?

Stay and pollute the message board with the same garbage?

[Raymond E. Wand]

Mr. Bushfarts vocabularly is deteriorating.

[Michael Larson]

Roy, you and Ray can have the last posts in this thread. I was only responding to Raymond cruse posts. Bye.

[Raymond E. Wand]

Michael fwiw when I said, "Michael mind your own business", I was referring to Michael Bazzo not you.