Need to know????

[Doug Edwards, CMI]

Ted was brilliant and brash at one time and a risk taker. The big three were so smug in their power; and the American public loves an underdog, always have and always will. The public wanted him to succeed so they watched his channel, but like some many who gain money, power and fame, Ted looked inward and thought he found the source of his ideas. He is an avowed atheist so he lives in perpetual darkness of another kind. He does not possess the "Light of Men". In short, Ted is an old man now and crazy as an outhouse rat. He rambles and rants when he talks and makes little sense. He is filthy rich but he is a lonely and unhappy man. He has discovered all his money can not buy him everything and the one thing he needs to be happy is totally free but his arrogance and pride prevents him from receiving it. What does it profit a man to gain the whole world and lose his soul.

[mnahrgang]

Originally Posted by dedwards

Ted was brilliant and brash at one time and a risk taker. The big three were so smug in their power; and the American public loves an underdog, always have and always will. The public wanted him to succeed so they watched his channel, but like some many who gain money, power and fame, Ted looked inward and thought he found the source of his ideas. He is an avowed atheist so he lives in perpetual darkness of another kind. He does not possess the "Light of Men". In short, Ted is an old man now and crazy as an outhouse rat. He rambles and rants when he talks and makes little sense. He is filthy rich but he is a lonely and unhappy man. He has discovered all his money can not buy him everything and the one thing he needs to be happy is totally free but his arrogance and pride prevents him from receiving it. What does it profit a man to gain the whole world and lose his soul.

Sounds like you've been reading some Ecclesiastes. Everything under the sun is meaningless.

[George A. H. Luck]

Hey, a few years locked in the same room with Jane Fonda will do that to anyone!

[Doug Edwards, CMI]

lol..You are probably right!

[Michael Larson]

No comments on the BBC editing guys?

[mnahrgang]

Originally Posted by mlarson

No comments on the BBC editing guys?

Why? Does that surprise you?

Ultra Liberalism, Radical Environmentalism, Global warming crowd... All guises to place political control of many into the hands of the few.

[Michael Larson]

Originally Posted by mnahrgang

Why? Does that surprise you?

Ultra Liberalism, Radical Environmentalism, Global warming crowd... All guises to place political control of many into the hands of the few.

I'm only surprised that the BBC folded so easily after first stating no change was needed.

[Michael Larson]

[Brian A. MacNeish]

Originally Posted by mlarson

So..........................spin it, Michael!!!!! The master has taught you.

[mnahrgang]

Originally Posted by Brian A. MacNeish

So..........................spin it, Michael!!!!! The master has taught you.

How do you spin that? It is what it is.

[Brian A. MacNeish]

Originally Posted by mnahrgang

How do you spin that? It is what it is.

1 year's data does not indicate a trend reversal.

[Michael Larson]

Originally Posted by Brian A. MacNeish

1 year's data does not indicate a trend reversal.

It is what it is Brian.
My concern is not with the data/graph but with the belief that too many thinking we can do anything about it.

[Michael Larson]

Go see this movie: Expelled: No Intelligence Allowed

Here is why:

It is a reality of PC liberalism: There is only one credible side to an issue, and any dissent is not only rejected, it is scorned. Global warming. Gay "rights." Abortion "rights." On these and so many other issues there is enlightenment, and then there is the Idiotic Other Side. PC liberalism's power centers are the news media, the entertainment industry and academia, and all are in the clutches of an unmistakable hypocrisy: Theirs is an ideology that preaches the freedom of thought and expression at every opportunity, yet practices absolute intolerance toward dissension.

[Michael Larson]

Category:Politics of Global Warming

Global Warming Tax Hikes Headed Your Way

............
Climate change is also about power. Power to control – and curtail – the power we rely on: to build, heat and cool our homes … produce raw materials, food and consumer products … transport people and products … and support modern living standards.
It’s about the selection, production, conservation, taxation – and prevention – of energy. It’s about access to real energy, versus mandates to use futuristic, mostly illusory, and certainly insufficient alternative energy. It’s about who gets to decide: how much energy we will have … where that energy will come from … what it will cost … and whether there will be enough energy to lift more families out of poverty.
It’s about simulations, scenarios and monsters conjured up by computer models that should never be used to chart government policy – especially on matters that will profoundly affect our livelihoods, living standards, life spans and dreams of a better future.
So hold onto your wallets, and hope you can hold onto your homes, cars and jobs. You’re about to be put on a wild political roller coaster. And don’t expect much honesty, transparency or accountability from climate Armageddonites. ...........


Our current crop of politicians are not leaders but simply followers with their collective fingers in the breeze. ML

[Michael Larson]