OAHI Out Of Control - Bylaws Breached - Documented Proof

[Roy D. Cooke, Sr]

Originally Posted by rwand1

Char Cooke?

Last time OAHI retained the services of a stenographer she disappeared with the minutes of the recorded BOD meetings never to be seen again!

I do not know if OAHI would pay what Char would need to fix their difficulties.
Char would also demand complete control no directors trying to influence her decisions.

I was at that meeting where the Stenographer was taking down short hand . I though she had a tape recorder also.

Seems to me many things where said .
I would love to have that information.
.
I never thought about the missing minutes till you said that now .
Thinking about it now I wonder if she was paid to lose those minutes
so there would be no record of what was said .

Strange how things keep falling into place.........Cookie

[rwand1]

Michael

Mind your own business rather than trying to comment on things you haven't got a clu about.

If I and others need your advice we will be sure to call on your vast knowledge.

[Michael Larson]

Originally Posted by rwand1

Michael

Mind your own business rather than trying to comment on things you haven't got a clu about.

If I and others need your advice we will be sure to call on your vast knowledge.

Raymond, I'm not the one who tried to claim someone disappeared.
Now you have a nice day and If I need to know something I won' be asking you.

[rwand1]

Michael

I think its your turn to disappear!

[Michael Larson]

Originally Posted by rwand1

Michael

I think its your turn to disappear!

-------------------------------------------

[rwand1]

Thanks I knew you'd see it my way.

[Michael Larson]

Back to your rant Raymond. I really have very little interest. I just wanted to point out that you hurt your own credibility.

I really do hope you find justice an are treated fairly. I wish you no ill will sir.

[rwand1]

Michael

I did as you suggested. I filed a Missing Person(s) Report.

The following appear to be missing in action or disappeared.

The Stenographer
The Bookkeeper
The Administrator
One Director
Three Treasurers
BOE - entire committee
DPPC - entire committee
The Bylaw Committee - all four

And a Partridge in a Pear tree!

All the best, thanks for the hits!

No hard feelings.

[Michael Larson]

Rotflmao

[rwand1]

Well OAHI has finally managed to release the CAHPI 2006 Audited Financial Statements to the OAHI members, but still no release of the OAHI financial audited documents from 2005, 2006 and 2007!

I guess we now know that OAHI feels that CAHPI's financial info is of more importance to OAHI members than OAHIs finances. It also shows that CAHPI has its house in order as far as financial info while OAHI dithers with the truth.

[rwand1]

Tick, tick, tick....

Has anyone seen Terry Carson, Andrew Bennett or the rest of the BOE/AR? Or the bylaw committee that these two Turkeys are on? If they can't decide who is Chair of the BOE/AR and can't prove that new bylaws are in place other than the current version 05/05, what else has their incompetence led to that they are not telling us about? Or what other demands have they made on others that have no validity? If they can pull this crap it calls into question their ability to execute their positions with fidelity, trust and ethics.

Thank you Terry Carson, Andrew Bennett and the rest of the BOE for your exmplary manners in trying to pull a fast one. Did you really think you would get away with this crap? Do you treat your clients with such contempt?

[rwand1]

Well I guess we know which losers are Co-Chair of the BOE/AR, documents don't lie, but we know who does...Simple question that the others knew but couldn't quite get past their ignorance in volunteering the info!

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

News From The Board of Examiners - November 5th, 2007

Introduction of the Member Qualifications System

The OAHI Board of Directors and the Board of Examiners are pleased to announce the development of a new educational stream and member class System designed to produce the best inspectors in Canada. We believe that the association has an obligation to the homebuyers of Ontario to provide qualified member inspectors, that the association has done its best and will continue to do its best to meet that obligation.

To that end we recognized that some elements of our current certification process to RHI were confusing and not equal for all, and that the member class system inherited after the 2001 merger was faulty. The 2006 introduction of the National Certification Program gave us reason to re-work our processes to better fit the new model.

So we did, and we call it the Member Qualifications System!

We will be bringing the details forward to all members over the next few weeks; once we are past the 2007 CAHPI Conference we will devote a fair amount of time to discussion of the Member Qualifications System (the System) and what it means to existing members, new members and the home buying public of Ontario. There is a flow chart being readied for distribution as well as descriptive documents to accompany it. The System is far reaching in purpose and effect, you need to be involved in its development.

Expect to discuss the System at your Regional Meeting Group, on the Knowledge Café and with each other. If it is beneficial to set up an email address to address your comments, we will. The System will require bylaw amendments and they require your approval either at the next AGM or a Special Meeting.

Expect to hear a lot about the System over the next few months. We're proud of it for many reasons, and here are a few:

. That Registered Home Inspector - RHI - remains the highest designation in Ontario home inspection and the goal for all members.
. The Ontario public is well served by a better-educated inspector who's education includes practical experience and benchmark testing.
. The System recognizes that Education is best attained in a front-loaded manner with marketplace demands and experience in the marketplace determining the awarding of the RHI designation.

. That membership levels should be simplified and re-organized to meet practical expectations, and that all members above Student level should be allowed to practice with full logo use.
. The System recognizes also that a minimum level of competence must be demonstrated before a member can be sanctioned to practice home inspection.

The new classes are:

Student (Non-Practicing)
Intern (Practicing)
Associate (Practicing)
Registered Home Inspection - RHI (Practicing)

The System incorporates education, mentoring and testing components as well as maintenance of CEUs. It eliminates the Option A and B streams and accommodates a fair, equal route to RHI for all.

Further we believe that this made-in-Ontario advancement fully recognizes and incorporates the National Certification Program and its goal of providing qualified home inspectors. It is the Board Of Examiner's conviction that any member, upon attaining Associate status, is fully qualified to be a National Certificate Holder, its their choice.

Further, the BOE believes that the System can contribute to the growth of the NCP by supplying qualified Holders at no cost to the NCP other than simple administration. In an ideal world it is our wish for a blended system where an Associate is automatically a Holder. With your permission, that could happen.

In our view the System is win / win for everybody involved in home inspection. A simpler system, high qualifications, the best education, the RHI designation, and above all, a clear rationale for the home buying public to choose an OAHI/CAHPI-Ontario inspector to inspect their home!

So be prepared for some documents and information describing the System and its strengths. We will get them to you soon. We look forward to a healthy debate, approval and implementation in the early part of 2008.

On behalf of the Board of Examiners,

Sincerely


Andrew Dixon, RHI
Co Chair, Board of Examiners

The Board of Examiners is Andrew Bennett, Terry Carson, Andrew Dixon, Glenn Gogal, Carl Inglis (Co Chair), Andrew Radomski and Doug Silverthorn.
------------------------------------------------
PLEASE NOTE: ALL EMAILS FROM 'OAHI PUBLICATIONS' news@oahi.com ARE NOT MONITORED OR USED TO REPLY TO EMAILS. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS ABOUT THIS EMAIL OR ANY EMAIL RECEIVED FROM 'OAHI PUBLICATIONS' PLEASE EMAIL oahi@oahi.com.

ONTARIO ASSOCIATION OF HOME INSPECTORS
Established by the Ontario Association of Home Inspectors Act, 1994
Box 38108, Castlewood R.P.O., Toronto ON M5N 3A8
Telephone: (416) 256-0960 or 1-888-RHI-OAHI (744-6244)
Email: oahi@oahi.com Fax: (905) 771-1079
Web site: www.oahi.com

[rwand1]

I would like to ask Andrew Radomoski why he is advertising his affiliation with the BOE/AR Committee to the public when he can't clearly follow the bylaws he as a committee member must surely appreciate and apply without undue influence, collusion, procedural bias, not to mention his standard of care considering his standing in his various associations he list. I would suggest to you his standard of care is higher not lower as he seems to assist in promoting through his errant actions.

Is this the standard the BOE/AR colludes to accept as a standard? More importantly why isn't the BOD undertaking to excercise a standard of care in the subversion of the rules they undertook to uphold and follow when they were elected to their office.

...and is a seasoned professional who knows the importance of providing an objective opinion.

http://www.ptpinspections.ca/Andrew_Profile.htm

[rwand1]

As with Andrew above I would also like to publicly ask Mr. Gogal who is well versed as stated on his website, why he felt compelled to go along with his BOE/AR committee members in demanding requirements that are not supported in the bylaws.

As you can see by his website Mr. Gogal would also have a higher standard of care to excercise his role both as Director of OAHI and his legal witness work would make it very difficult for Mr. Gogal to suggest he was unware, didn't know, or wasn't aware of the bylaws let alone what version was to be followed. The make them up as you go version or version 05/05?

Mr. Gogal what assurance will the public have considering you actions in relying on your expert advice vis-a-vis that you comprehend your roles you claim to be proficient in?

http://www.onsiteinspections.ca/020~...egal_Services/

[rwand1]

Mr. Gogal when are you going to come clean as to your involvement with the Defect Recognition course to the exclusion of other qualified members and when do you plan on explaining to the members you represent to come clean about the lack of fudiciary duties? Have you been on record in the minutes of BOD meetings as being in favour of due expendicency in informing the members of where there money is and has gone? I hope you have left a record indicating your objections as to what you did or didn't do as a director.