Schedule A inspection

[Marcel Gratton]

Originally Posted by smay

I need some help trying to put an age on a furnace and water heater and a joist span question.
Furnace:Attachment 49226 Attachment 49227

H/W tank Attachment 49228 Attachment 49229


Floor joist span is over 15ft Long on an addition 16"OC 2 x 10's No beams or support posts. Span goes from block foundation to block foundation in crawlspace addition.
Seems a bit long for me ...a bit of bounce.

Does anyone know what these are?? cold water line.
Just threw this one in!!

Attachment 49230

Thanks

CMHC's Canadian Wood-Frame House Construction Table 15 reads in part that if using Spruce ­ pine ­ fir (includes spruce [all species except coast sitka spruce], jack pine, lodgepole pine, balsam fir and alpine fir) No. 1 and No. 2 that a 2X10 joist spaced 12 oc with strapping & bridging can span 15 ft. That is for a 40psf load.

If spaced 16 oc then a 2X12 is required with bridging.

[Jeffrey R. Jonas]

Marcel,
Any idea what the predominate species of structural lumber is in the OP's area?
Just curious.
Jeff

[KEVIN WOOD]

Correct! We are talking a minimum according to IBC at 20psf and I would never recommend this as we know the floor will bounce. 2X10 joist spaced 12 oc with strapping & bridging can span 15 ft. That is for a 40psf load.

[Jeffrey R. Jonas]

Originally Posted by jjonas

Wand Raymond... your friend request has been DENIED!

Well that didn't last very long...

Rwand2... your 3rd attempt at a friend request is DENIED !!!

[Roy D. Cooke, Sr]

Originally Posted by jjonas

Well that didn't last very long...

Rwand2... your 3rd attempt at a friend request is DENIED !!!

Jeffery How Do you think your posting this information help the Homiest or
our Industry .
You and others adding fuel does little good .

This is an open forum and the public and other associations just love to see what is happening at NACHI.
You are reaping what you sew
Fortunatly the ESOP string has been removed and now you bring your Disturbing posts over to another Canadian site .
How about helping our industry/association instead of constantly complaining . Thanks ... Roy

[Christopher Currins]

Originally Posted by jjonas

Well that didn't last very long...

Rwand2... your 3rd attempt at a friend request is DENIED !!!

I'm jealous, Ray doesn't want to be my friend.

[Sean Fogarty]

I will be your friend Ray. Anyone who an piss off Larson is worth keeping around.

[Roy D. Cooke, Sr]

Originally Posted by ldapkus1

Give him a call, he's lonely.
Cell 519-942-6647

This is extremly poor taste . I also think you could be getting your self in Trouble making a post like this .... Roy

[James H. Bushart]

Originally Posted by rcooke

This is extremly poor taste . I also think you could be getting your self in Trouble making a post like this .... Roy

I agree. I'm sure the intended victim of these posts will probably let this pass though, and not follow through with officials in the state in which they were posted.

http://www.ncsl.org/default.aspx?tabid=13495

[Linas Dapkus]

Originally Posted by ccurrins

Tell Ray he's the one looking for trouble, and is probably going to find it sooner than he thinks if he keeps calling me, which is just did after reading above post.

Yeah, I get the calls and emails too.

[Christopher Currins]

Originally Posted by jbushart

I agree. I'm sure the intended victim of these posts will probably let this pass though, and not follow through with officials in the state in which they were posted.

http://www.ncsl.org/default.aspx?tabid=13495

Cyberharassment. Cyberharassment differs from cyberstalking in that it is generally defined as not involving a credible threat. Cyberharassment usually pertains to threatening or harassing email messages, instant messages, or to blog entries or websites dedicated solely to tormenting an individual. Some states approach cyberharrassment by including language addressing electronic communications in general harassment statutes, while others have created stand-alone cyberharassment statutes.

[Roy D. Cooke, Sr]

I can not understand why you people Come to the Canadian site attack Raymond non stop and now he has resigned from NACHI you carry on like a bunch of Cry babies ,
Some of you guys planted the seeds and now you are reaping what you have done .
Some seem to feel proud of what you have done.
Look close and see there are a lot less Canadian now post on the NACHI site .
You Are spending a lot of time saying silly things and a lot less time helping our Industry .

[Linas Dapkus]

Originally Posted by rcooke

I can not understand why you people Come to the Canadian site attack Raymond non stop and now he has resigned from NACHI you carry on like a bunch of Cry babies ,
Some of you guys planted the seeds and now you are reaping what you have done .
Some seem to feel proud of what you have done.
Look close and see there are a lot less Canadian now post on the NACHI site .
You Are spending a lot of time saying silly things and a lot less time helping our Industry .

What attacks? What are you talking about??

[Roy D. Cooke, Sr]

Originally Posted by jbushart

I agree. I'm sure the intended victim of these posts will probably let this pass though, and not follow through with officials in the state in which they were posted.

http://www.ncsl.org/default.aspx?tabid=13495

Thanks James for your information that is not happening it is not being ignored.
I am Know Many are being kept up to date .
This is so unfortunate and is hurting our industry big time .
Lots are posting false information that again is only adding more fuel to the fire .
The string on the ESOP has been removed , These silly people have too much time on and can not seem to see the damage they are doing to NACHI , our Industry and them selves.
I expect this string might also be removed .
If I had the power I would politely have set up a discipline committee and asked the offenders why they continue to make stupid posts and ask them what should be done with them .
The methods we have now are useless and need to be changed immediately .
I expect these post's could cost much money to some one ... Roy

It is time for these silly people to grow up and help our Homies .

[James H. Bushart]

Originally Posted by ccurrins

Cyberharassment. Cyberharassment differs from cyberstalking in that it is generally defined as not involving a credible threat. Cyberharassment usually pertains to threatening or harassing ... blog entries or websites dedicated solely to tormenting an individual. Some states approach cyberharrassment by including language addressing electronic communications in general harassment statutes, while others have created stand-alone cyberharassment statutes.

Like I said, he will probably do nothing about this.

Illinois law, for example, says...

(720 ILCS 5/12‑7.5)
(Text of Section from P.A. 96‑1551)
Sec. 12‑7.5. Cyberstalking.
(a) A person commits cyberstalking when he or she engages in a course of conduct using electronic communication directed at a specific person, and he or she knows or should know that would cause a reasonable person to:
(1) fear for his or her safety or the safety of a
third person; or
(2) places that person or a family member of that
person in reasonable apprehension of immediate or future bodily harm, sexual assault, confinement, or restraint; or
(a‑5) A person commits cyberstalking when he or she,
knowingly and without lawful justification, creates and maintains an Internet website or webpage which is accessible to one or more third parties for a period of at least 24 hours, and which contains statements harassing another person and:
(2) which places that person or a family member of
that person in reasonable apprehension of immediate or future bodily harm, sexual assault, confinement, or restraint, or
(b) Sentence. Cyberstalking is a Class 4 felony; a second or subsequent conviction is a Class 3 felony.
(c) For purposes of this Section:
(1) "Course of conduct" means 2 or more acts,
including but not limited to acts in which a defendant directly, indirectly, or through third parties, by any action, method, device, or means follows, monitors, observes, surveils, threatens, or communicates to or about, a person, engages in other non‑consensual contact, or interferes with or damages a person's property or pet. The incarceration in a penal institution of a person who commits the course of conduct is not a bar to prosecution under this Section.
(3) "Emotional distress" means significant mental
suffering, anxiety or alarm.
(5) "Non‑consensual contact" means any contact with
the victim that is initiated or continued without the victim's consent, including but not limited to being in the physical presence of the victim; appearing within the sight of the victim; approaching or confronting the victim in a public place or on private property; appearing at the workplace or residence of the victim; entering onto or remaining on property owned, leased, or occupied by the victim; or placing an object on, or delivering an object to, property owned, leased, or occupied by the victim.
(7) "Third party" means any person other than the
person violating these provisions and the person or persons towards whom the violator's actions are directed.
(2) suffer other emotional distress.
(a‑3) A person commits cyberstalking when he or she, knowingly and without lawful justification, on at least 2 separate occasions, harasses another person through the use of electronic communication and:
(1) at any time transmits a threat of immediate or
future bodily harm, sexual assault, confinement, or restraint and the threat is directed towards that person or a family member of that person; or
(3) at any time knowingly solicits the commission of
an act by any person which would be a violation of this Code directed towards that person or a family member of that person.
(1) which communicates a threat of immediate or
future bodily harm, sexual assault, confinement, or restraint, where the threat is directed towards that person or a family member of that person, or
(3) which knowingly solicits the commission of an act
by any person which would be a violation of this Code directed towards that person or a family member of that person.
(2) "Electronic communication" means any transfer of
signs, signals, writings, sounds, data, or intelligence of any nature transmitted in whole or in part by a wire, radio, electromagnetic, photoelectric, or photo‑optical system. "Electronic communication" includes transmissions through an electronic device including, but not limited to, a telephone, cellular phone, computer, or pager, which communication includes, but is not limited to, e‑mail, instant message, text message, or voice mail.
(4) "Harass" means to engage in a knowing and willful
course of conduct directed at a specific person that alarms, torments, or terrorizes that person.
(6) "Reasonable person" means a person in the
victim's circumstances, with the victim's knowledge of the defendant and the defendant's prior acts.
(d) Telecommunications carriers, commercial mobile service providers, and providers of information services, including, but not limited to, Internet service providers and hosting service providers, are not liable under this Section, except for willful and wanton misconduct, by virtue of the transmission, storage, or caching of electronic communications or messages of others or by virtue of the provision of other related telecommunications, commercial mobile services, or information services used by others in violation of this Section.
(Source: P.A. 96‑328, eff. 8‑11‑09; 96‑686, eff. 1‑1‑10; 96‑1000, eff. 7‑2‑10; 97‑303, eff. 8‑11‑11.)

(Text of Section from P.A. 97‑311)
Sec. 12‑7.5. Cyberstalking.
(a) A person commits cyberstalking when he or she engages in a course of conduct using electronic communication directed at a specific person, and he or she knows or should know that would cause a reasonable person to:
(1) fear for his or her safety or the safety of a
third person; or
(2) places that person or a family member of that
person in reasonable apprehension of immediate or future bodily harm, sexual assault, confinement, or restraint; or
(a‑5) A person commits cyberstalking when he or she,
knowingly and without lawful justification, creates and maintains an Internet website or webpage which is accessible to one or more third parties for a period of at least 24 hours, and which contains statements harassing another person and:
(2) which places that person or a family member of
that person in reasonable apprehension of immediate or future bodily harm, sexual assault, confinement, or restraint, or
(b) Sentence. Cyberstalking is a Class 4 felony. A second or subsequent conviction for cyberstalking is a Class 3 felony.
(c) For purposes of this Section:
(1) "Course of conduct" means 2 or more acts,
including but not limited to acts in which a defendant directly, indirectly, or through third parties, by any action, method, device, or means follows, monitors, observes, surveils, threatens, or communicates to or about, a person, engages in other non‑consensual contact, or interferes with or damages a person's property or pet. The incarceration in a penal institution of a person who commits the course of conduct is not a bar to prosecution under this Section.
(3) "Emotional distress" means significant mental
suffering, anxiety or alarm.
(5) "Non‑consensual contact" means any contact with
the victim that is initiated or continued without the victim's consent, including but not limited to being in the physical presence of the victim; appearing within the sight of the victim; approaching or confronting the victim in a public place or on private property; appearing at the workplace or residence of the victim; entering onto or remaining on property owned, leased, or occupied by the victim; or placing an object on, or delivering an object to, property owned, leased, or occupied by the victim.
(7) "Third party" means any person other than the
<DIV align=justify>person violating these provisions and the person or persons towards whom the violator's actions are directed.