InterNACHI


Go Back   InterNACHI Inspection Forum > Miscellaneous Inspection Topics > IAC2 Indoor Air Forum

Notices

IAC2 Indoor Air Forum This forum is hosted by InterNACHI for members of the International Association of Certified Indoor Air Consultants.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
  #1  
Old 5/18/09, 8:14 PM
dplummer dplummer is offline
Active Poster
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Collingwood, ON
Posts: 236
Please Note: dplummer is a non-member guest and is in no way affiliated with InterNACHI or its members.
Default Inspector Failed to Detect Mold

Homeowners' suit claims inspector failed to detect mold


5/14/2009 4:00 PM
By Kelly Holleran

Two Jefferson County individuals say the home inspection company they hired before they bought their home failed to identify mold growing within the house.

Cole and Latisha Landry filed a lawsuit May 12 in Jefferson County District Court against Louis Ashy, doing business as Pillar to Post.

The Landrys claim they asked Ashy to inspect a home located at 677 Ridgewood in Port Neches on Dec. 8.

"Defendant was to inspect the property and indicate the items in need of repair or not functioning and report on those applicable items," the suit states.

Ashy failed to detect mold growing on the home's HVAC unit, the complaint says.

Only in mid-January, after the Landry's move-in date of Jan. 9, did they find the visible mold growth throughout the HVAC cabinet. Visual water marks could also be seen on numerous locations in the cabinet, the Landrys say.

After finding the mold, the Landrys hired an environmental consulting and testing professional and learned that concentrations of various molds were identified in air samples, according to court documents.

"The inside samples held concentrations of Penicillium/Aspergillus were greater in the HVAC closet and the children's bedroom," the suit states.

Ashy was guilty of negligently failing to adequately inspect the property and of failing to state in his report there were visible signs of water marks and suspected mold growth in the HVAC closet, the complaint says.

The Landrys are seeking unspecified treble and discretionary damages of less than $50,000, plus attorney's fees, costs and other relief to which they may be entitled.

Brandon P. Monk of The Monk Law Firm in Port Arthur will be representing them.

The case has been assigned to Judge Donald Floyd, 172nd District Court.

Jefferson County District Court case number: E184-045.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Interesting article about mold by litigation. gromicko IAC2 Indoor Air Forum 16 5/5/11 8:48 PM
Mold mcyr IAC2 Indoor Air Forum 5 9/13/10 11:31 AM
GAO calls for collaboration on indoor mold guidance. gromicko Legislation, Licensing & Legal Issues for Inspectors 32 11/11/08 9:47 AM
The new scoop on mold insurance Brian A. MacNeish Ancillary Inspection Services & Additional Topics 2 1/1/08 2:30 PM
CMI imposter? jbraun Certified Master Inspector (CMI) Discussion 118 11/26/07 5:55 PM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 2:18 PM.


Popular Sections

:

All Sections

Inspection News

InterNACHI Membership

Inspection Standards

Inspection Education

InterNACHI Inspectors

Inspection Links

 

 

 

NACHI.ORG Statistics

 

 

no new posts