InterNACHI


Go Back   InterNACHI Message Board > Additional Forums > IAC2 Forum

IAC2 Forum This forum is hosted by InterNACHI for members of the International Association of Indoor Air Consultants.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 7/24/08, 7:34 PM
Ben J. Gromicko's Avatar
Ben J. Gromicko Ben J. Gromicko is offline
InterNACHI Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Boulder, CO
Posts: 560
Ben J. Gromicko is generally well trusted Ben J. Gromicko is generally well trusted
Default That which is visible is mold

Visible Mold
According to the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), in most cases, if visible mold is present, sampling is unnecessary. An inspector may object to that statement, because of the assumption that what is present is actually mold. There may be many inspectors who are comfortable in making that assumption.

“That which is visible is mold” is a statement based upon assumption. The only way to actually know that what is visible is actually mold is through sampling. If neither you nor your client need to confirm that what you see is actually mold, you don't need to sample. However, there may be others (affected by the findings of the inspector’s report) who will request proof or validation of the findings, including the occupant or owner of the building.

How Do You Know It’s Mold?
Don’t guess. It is essential for an inspector to report with a high level of accuracy. Reporting “the presence of visible mold” for a professional inspector should be based upon fact or evidence rather than assumptions and appearances. When the appearance of what is visible is at least questionable, the inspector should search for evidence to confirm what is being examined. For an inspector, it may be a great leap of faith to report that a moldy-looking building component is in fact actually visible mold (or microbial growth). Error comes with guessing.

Something that has the appearance of mold may not actually be mold. For example, spider webs, fine dust, paint spray, dried mud, and water stains may all give the appearance of microbial growth. The inspector whom reports the existence of mold growth based upon the discovery of something that appears to look moldy may be in error. It may be mold; it may not.

To report mold growth with accuracy and confidence is through sampling by a certified inspector and analysis by a laboratory.




BEN GROMICKO

Proud InterNACHI Member #97010101

Latest Online Education Video: HVAC Training
Director, Online Education for Inspectors @
NACHI.TV (303)862-2611 ben@nachi.tv
President, 100-day Home Warranty for Home Inspectors @ mountainwarranty.com 1(800)671-4351 ben@mountainwarranty.com

Reply With Quote
Find an InterNACHI certified Montana Home Inspector (and anywhere else in North America)
  #2  
Old 7/24/08, 8:39 PM
James H. Bushart's Avatar
James H. Bushart James H. Bushart is offline
InterNACHI Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Cassville, MO
Posts: 10,645
James H. Bushart has a reputation beyond repute James H. Bushart has a reputation beyond repute James H. Bushart has a reputation beyond repute James H. Bushart has a reputation beyond repute James H. Bushart has a reputation beyond repute James H. Bushart has a reputation beyond repute James H. Bushart has a reputation beyond repute James H. Bushart has a reputation beyond repute James H. Bushart has a reputation beyond repute James H. Bushart has a reputation beyond repute James H. Bushart has a reputation beyond repute
Send a message via MSN to jbushart
Default Re: That which is visible is mold

That which is visible is "...an organic substance consistent with mold that should be sampled, tested and (if applicable) removed by a qualified mold remediator prior to close of escrow".



James H. Bushart, Certified Professional Inspector

Member, International Code Council (ICC)
Member, American Society of Home Inspectors (ASHI)
Member, International Association of Certified Home Inspectors (iNACHI)
Member, Missouri Association of Building Officials and Inspectors (MABOI)
Member, Missouri Association of Real Estate Inspectors (MAREI)

www.missourihomeinspection.com

Last edited by jbushart; 7/24/08 at 9:26 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 7/24/08, 8:54 PM
Michael Larson's Avatar
Michael Larson Michael Larson is offline
InterNACHI Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Hudson, WI
Posts: 11,329
Michael Larson has a reputation beyond repute Michael Larson has a reputation beyond repute Michael Larson has a reputation beyond repute Michael Larson has a reputation beyond repute Michael Larson has a reputation beyond repute Michael Larson has a reputation beyond repute Michael Larson has a reputation beyond repute Michael Larson has a reputation beyond repute Michael Larson has a reputation beyond repute Michael Larson has a reputation beyond repute Michael Larson has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: That which is visible is mold

I had a client this week who's agent told me she might need a mold specialist because they could smell mold in the basement and did I know any.

After telling her let's do the inspection before we go down that road.

When I walked down the stairs to the basement it did smell pretty bad.
But nose said it was animal waste.

When the client showed up I gave them my opinion and the client turned to the agent and said "see?"

I then showed them the corner of the wall that was chewed on and the yellow lines running down the wall and onto the carpet. They weren't talking about mold anymore.

Should I have had the yellow matter tested to make sure what it was?



"Never underestimate the difficulty of changing false beliefs by facts."
Henry Rosovsky-Harvard

Michael Larson
Services provided in East MN and West WI
InspectraPro
or
Minnesota Home Inspector

Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 7/24/08, 8:59 PM
Dennis R. Goudreau Dennis R. Goudreau is offline
InterNACHI Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Nashua, NH
Posts: 585
Dennis R. Goudreau is well trusted Dennis R. Goudreau is well trusted Dennis R. Goudreau is well trusted Dennis R. Goudreau is well trusted
Default Re: That which is visible is mold

Ben
they are correct, there is no need at the initial visual inspection to do air quality testing, however where you and I part is that mold growth can assessed by other means then air, a scraping sample can be taken and sent off for a ERMI test which will tell you down to the strain of mold, also mold especially in a colonized form has distinct patterns of growth which are recognizable,plus what is the Rh,moisture level,temp, if using IR what are you seeing. and yes wood that has been affected by condensadition or water can appear black but is not mold, finally if a spider web throughs some one off they should not be looking for mold, this is my opinion
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 7/24/08, 10:23 PM
James E. Braun, CMI James E. Braun, CMI is offline
InterNACHI Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Jefferson City, MO
Posts: 1,510
James E. Braun, CMI .
Default Re: That which is visible is mold

Ben,
You might not want to open up that can of worms.
Especially do not quote the EPA because they are wrong about mold, and it can be easily proved. Also the EPA are nothing but hypocrites when it comes to mold.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 7/25/08, 2:38 AM
Dylan J. Bucknavich Dylan J. Bucknavich is offline
InterNACHI Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Chandler, AZ
Posts: 560
Dylan J. Bucknavich is well trusted Dylan J. Bucknavich is well trusted Dylan J. Bucknavich is well trusted Dylan J. Bucknavich is well trusted
Default Re: That which is visible is mold

Are we qualified to discredit the EPA?

I will always sample for mold, visible or not. The majority of my sampling requests involve a sick occupant who needs to know what is making them that way. Now the fact that I can see the growth and source doesn't help the client. What does help them is knowing what exactly is in the air. They can then compare that to an allergen test from their doctor. Combine that with my allergen screen and you have a pretty good base to work from.

I want to have a qualititative and quantitative answer for my clients, regardless of the mold's visiblity or lack thereof.



Dylan Bucknavich
Arizona Professional Home Inspection L.L.C.
www.AzProHomeInspection.com
Chandler, AZ
Nachi ID# 06020796
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 7/25/08, 4:24 AM
James E. Braun, CMI James E. Braun, CMI is offline
InterNACHI Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Jefferson City, MO
Posts: 1,510
James E. Braun, CMI .
Default Re: That which is visible is mold

EPA does it to themselves. Government at its finest.
Pick up and read some trade magizines. There is a lot of discussion about this from some very smart people in the mold industry. The EPA has even made some press releases. They are starting to back peddle, they realize they are over their heads when it comes to mold.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 7/25/08, 7:16 PM
Ben J. Gromicko's Avatar
Ben J. Gromicko Ben J. Gromicko is offline
InterNACHI Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Boulder, CO
Posts: 560
Ben J. Gromicko is generally well trusted Ben J. Gromicko is generally well trusted
Default Re: That which is visible is mold

Quote:
Originally Posted by dgoudreau
Ben
where you and I part is that mold growth can assessed by other means then air
Did I use the word "air?"
?




BEN GROMICKO

Proud InterNACHI Member #97010101

Latest Online Education Video: HVAC Training
Director, Online Education for Inspectors @
NACHI.TV (303)862-2611 ben@nachi.tv
President, 100-day Home Warranty for Home Inspectors @ mountainwarranty.com 1(800)671-4351 ben@mountainwarranty.com

Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 7/25/08, 7:20 PM
Ben J. Gromicko's Avatar
Ben J. Gromicko Ben J. Gromicko is offline
InterNACHI Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Boulder, CO
Posts: 560
Ben J. Gromicko is generally well trusted Ben J. Gromicko is generally well trusted
Default Re: That which is visible is mold

So, do you agree see the "catch 22" with the EPA's statement?

"In most cases, if visible mold is present, sampling is unnecessary."

You can't tell if what you are looking at is mold or not (with confidence and accuracy) without sampling. Sampling is necessary to confirm that which is visible is mold.

Do you see the "catch 22" with the EPA's statement?




BEN GROMICKO

Proud InterNACHI Member #97010101

Latest Online Education Video: HVAC Training
Director, Online Education for Inspectors @
NACHI.TV (303)862-2611 ben@nachi.tv
President, 100-day Home Warranty for Home Inspectors @ mountainwarranty.com 1(800)671-4351 ben@mountainwarranty.com

Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 7/25/08, 7:24 PM
Ben J. Gromicko's Avatar
Ben J. Gromicko Ben J. Gromicko is offline
InterNACHI Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Boulder, CO
Posts: 560
Ben J. Gromicko is generally well trusted Ben J. Gromicko is generally well trusted
Default Re: That which is visible is mold

By phrasing it in this way: "In most cases, if visible mold is present, sampling is unnecessary," the EPA has actually been saying all along that "Sampling is necessary to confirm that which is visible as mold."




BEN GROMICKO

Proud InterNACHI Member #97010101

Latest Online Education Video: HVAC Training
Director, Online Education for Inspectors @
NACHI.TV (303)862-2611 ben@nachi.tv
President, 100-day Home Warranty for Home Inspectors @ mountainwarranty.com 1(800)671-4351 ben@mountainwarranty.com

Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 7/25/08, 7:29 PM
Michael Larson's Avatar
Michael Larson Michael Larson is offline
InterNACHI Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Hudson, WI
Posts: 11,329
Michael Larson has a reputation beyond repute Michael Larson has a reputation beyond repute Michael Larson has a reputation beyond repute Michael Larson has a reputation beyond repute Michael Larson has a reputation beyond repute Michael Larson has a reputation beyond repute Michael Larson has a reputation beyond repute Michael Larson has a reputation beyond repute Michael Larson has a reputation beyond repute Michael Larson has a reputation beyond repute Michael Larson has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: That which is visible is mold

Quote:
Originally Posted by bgromicko
By phrasing it in this way: "In most cases, if visible mold is present, sampling is unnecessary," the EPA has actually been saying all along that "Sampling is necessary to confirm that which is visible as mold."
Ben, it appears you are spinning the the intent of the EPA statement to fit your own belief and or training. IMO

Perhaps all they are really saying is that mold sampling is rarely necessary.

Now I think we may agree that it may be useful for some who are allergic to determine what type of mold is present.

The fact is that all of us are exposed to mold everyday of our lives.



"Never underestimate the difficulty of changing false beliefs by facts."
Henry Rosovsky-Harvard

Michael Larson
Services provided in East MN and West WI
InspectraPro
or
Minnesota Home Inspector

Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 7/25/08, 9:40 PM
Dennis R. Goudreau Dennis R. Goudreau is offline
InterNACHI Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Nashua, NH
Posts: 585
Dennis R. Goudreau is well trusted Dennis R. Goudreau is well trusted Dennis R. Goudreau is well trusted Dennis R. Goudreau is well trusted
Default Re: That which is visible is mold

Quote:
Originally Posted by bgromicko
Did I use the word "air?"
?
Ben
I understand you never said air, I just wanted to describe both testing methods is all, and yes the EPA language can make you dizzy. But we all have mold around us, just as we all have radon around us. I call it out as a biological growth has been seen at this location and is in need of further attention. Mike is right for strain testing for allergens, until we get something beside a standard this is what we have as inspectors and we have to do right by our clients. Bottom line what ever you want to call it,it has to go.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 7/26/08, 3:08 PM
Ben J. Gromicko's Avatar
Ben J. Gromicko Ben J. Gromicko is offline
InterNACHI Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Boulder, CO
Posts: 560
Ben J. Gromicko is generally well trusted Ben J. Gromicko is generally well trusted
Default Re: That which is visible is mold

Quote:
Originally Posted by mlarson
Ben, it appears you are spinning the the intent of the EPA statement to fit your own belief and or training.
I believe I've had no formal training in mold. Often a fresh perspective and critical evaluation of an old way of doing things may seem like spinning.

The state of Minnesota states that "health effects of mold exposure can be severe, depending upon the type of mold present." The only way to know the mold type is through sampling. The EPA statement (previously posted) is just inadequate.




BEN GROMICKO

Proud InterNACHI Member #97010101

Latest Online Education Video: HVAC Training
Director, Online Education for Inspectors @
NACHI.TV (303)862-2611 ben@nachi.tv
President, 100-day Home Warranty for Home Inspectors @ mountainwarranty.com 1(800)671-4351 ben@mountainwarranty.com

Reply With Quote
Find an InterNACHI certified Montana Home Inspector (and anywhere else in North America)
  #14  
Old 7/26/08, 7:09 PM
James E. Braun, CMI James E. Braun, CMI is offline
InterNACHI Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Jefferson City, MO
Posts: 1,510
James E. Braun, CMI .
Default Re: That which is visible is mold

Ben is right.
Mike, stop quoting the EPA. You are scaring me.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 7/27/08, 5:17 PM
Ben J. Gromicko's Avatar
Ben J. Gromicko Ben J. Gromicko is offline
InterNACHI Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Boulder, CO
Posts: 560
Ben J. Gromicko is generally well trusted Ben J. Gromicko is generally well trusted
Default Re: That which is visible is mold

"Surface samples may be collected to identify the presence or absence of mold if a visual inspection is unclear (for example - discoloration or staining)."

Who said that?




BEN GROMICKO

Proud InterNACHI Member #97010101

Latest Online Education Video: HVAC Training
Director, Online Education for Inspectors @
NACHI.TV (303)862-2611 ben@nachi.tv
President, 100-day Home Warranty for Home Inspectors @ mountainwarranty.com 1(800)671-4351 ben@mountainwarranty.com

Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts