Reported Post by mlarson

mlarson · June 17, 2013, 7:19pm

mlarson has reported a post.

Reason:

Post: Home inspection regulation is quebec next???
Forum: Canadian Inspectors
Assigned Moderators: gbeaumont, fmagdefrau, fcarrio, lkage, mkyriacou, jmckenna1, rromoser, sgilligan1, iniquette, bjones5, jramos, wwilson3

Posted by: ryoung7
Original Content:

Home inspection regulation is quebec next???
http://oaciq.com/en/articles/home-inspectors-among-the-appraisers-members-of-ordre-evaluateurs-agrees-du-quebec

Perhaps I missed something, but I don’t see anything in the act giving this body the right to select one group over the other and to its own arbitrary standards.

http://oaciq.com/en/the-oaciq/by-laws-and-regulations

Anti competitive? Exclusion?
Creates a monopoly in light of the fact it controls 90% of the real estate sales?

It would also appear it may be contrary to a Competition Bureau ruling…
Rules and regulations should not restrict competition any more than is necessary to achieve the desired objectives.

Rules and regulations must be impartial and not self-serving – i.e, they should not constrain the ability of particular market participants to compete.

Rules and regulations should be subject to periodic review and assessment.
To the extent possible, associations should seek to promote open competition in order to maximize consumer benefits and the efficient utilization of resources.
        **[Competition Bureau Revisits its Self-Regulated Professions Study After Four Years](http://www.ipvancouverblog.com/2011/09/competition-bureau-revisits-its-self-regulated-professions-study-after-four-years/)**



        	September 6, 2011


      
                				On September 2, 2011, the Competition Bureau released its “ex-post assessment” of its 2007 Self-Regulated Professions Study ([Self-regulated professions – Balancing competition and regulation](http://www.competitionbureau.gc.ca/eic/site/cb-bc.nsf/vwapj/Professions%20study%20final%20E.pdf/$FILE/Professions%20study%20final%20E.pdf) (December, 2007)).
According to the Bureau, its new Study “surveys and assesses developments that have taken place relating to recommendations made in [its] 2007 Study” and “provides an overview of the progress made since 2007” to the earlier recommendations made by the Bureau.
In 2007, the Bureau released a Study on the rules and regulations governing five Canadian professions (real estate agents, pharmacists, lawyers, accountants and optometrists), intended to study the impact (or lack of it in some cases) of competition on the self-regulated professions in Canada.

The Bureau’s 2007 Study examined six aspects of self-regulation – in particular, restrictions on entering a profession, mobility, business structure, scope of services/practice, advertising and pricing and compensation – and made 53 recommendations to the various professions in an effort to try and enhance competition in those professions.
In addition to these specific issues, the Bureau’s 2007 Study also set out the following six “guiding principles” for how professional associations and, to the extent relevant, provincial governments, should approach the self-regulation of professionals from a competition law perspective:

For the Bureau’s news release see:
Competition Bureau Releases Ex-Post Assessment of the Self-Regulated Professions Study
For the Bureau’s study see:
Self-Regulated Professions – Post-Study Assessment
For the Bureau’s 2007 Study see:
Self-regulated professions – Balancing competition and regulation
Lots in Ray Wands post.
Roy Cooke to has lots to say on the matter.

rcooke · June 17, 2013, 7:56pm

More of Michaels bunk .
He just has to try and start trouble as per usual ,shows just how jealous he is .
I guess you should take this too the ESOP .

mlarson · June 17, 2013, 9:03pm

I spoke truth Roy.

Sorry you can’t handle it.

Every post of Raymond’s was removed from this message board at his expulsion.

I think that was wrong but it is what happened.

Try to be honest Roy. I know it is hard for you.

rcooke · June 17, 2013, 9:41pm

You know it makes me so happy to see Michael L show how upset he gets when ever he finds one of my posts.
I get a chuckle to see how hard he tries to upset me .
It is so obvious how extremely jealous he is of me .
By the way Michael Ray Wand wishes you a long Life .

mlarson · June 17, 2013, 9:43pm

Roy I thought you ha me on ignore.

I guess you got bored again.

Tell Raymond to pound sand.

rcooke · June 17, 2013, 10:11pm

.

I try not to tell others what they should do .

I took you off to see if you trying to be a nice guy or ???

mlarson · June 17, 2013, 10:13pm

Why?

Have you apologized for lying about me?

rcooke · June 17, 2013, 10:15pm

Why not tell all what I am to have said about you .

mlarson · June 17, 2013, 10:22pm

You sound just like Thornberry.:roll:

rcooke · June 17, 2013, 10:24pm

Quote:
Originally Posted by mlarson http://nachi.cachefly.net/forum/images/2006/buttons/viewpost.gif
*Why?

Have you apologized for lying about me?*

Why not tell all what I am to have said about you .

mlarson · June 17, 2013, 10:27pm

Yep, just like Thornberry.

No ability it admit fault.

rlewis5 · June 17, 2013, 10:29pm

There is Mike …stooping low again.
You must be bored outta your head !
Go drink a beer and come back with something better.

rcooke · June 17, 2013, 10:30pm

Michael [FONT=Verdana][/FONT]
[FONT=Calibri][/FONT]
Are you one who has voted then great we all appreciate you.
If you have not voted now would be good time to look at the pictures that have been posted .
The awards committee and many members have put their time and effort into this.
The best way we know if you appreciate what is done is by seeing the number of Votes .
Please help us by voting … Thanks … Roy

rcooke · June 17, 2013, 10:40pm

Gee mike I am very, very, very sorry .
** Please except my apology.**
Now will you please tell me what I am apologizing for .

Roy Cooke UE

mlarson · June 17, 2013, 10:50pm

Telling the truth is not low but then you can’t seem to understand.

rlewis5 · June 17, 2013, 10:51pm

Why apologize to him?
He will figure you are in some sort of conspiracy with the elite .
He wakes up in the morning with fear and goes to bed at night with the thoughts someone is out to get him.
poor soul…notice the lower case.
Sick Fu**er
He even had the gall to tell me my days were numbers.Maybe in other words .
However, in actually he is correct.
Don’t waste your time Roy.

wwilson3 · June 17, 2013, 10:57pm

Um Micheal Robert is a memeber so you know this means nothing but you already knew that. Just a reminder Members can not be moderated

mcyr · June 17, 2013, 11:18pm

I think it has to do with attention Wayne.

nsusdorf · June 17, 2013, 11:37pm

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RYLsyNBnE5M

rcooke · June 17, 2013, 11:52pm

How about that Mike (“Why Can’t We Be Friends” )

Mike did you vote yet???